bmw 335i dyno test. what result ?

buta · 05-16-2012, 03:42 PM

Mods: (JB4) (intake) (Downpipes) (Intercooler)
(Exhaust). map2

Is it a good result ?

bigdnno98 · 05-16-2012, 04:54 PM

What were your baseline numbers?

Wedge1967 · 05-16-2012, 05:04 PM

Looks good. I'm running a Procede with the same mods and see about the same numbers on a mustang dyno. Dynojet will run higher numbers from what I've seen, but it all depends on calibration. I haven't read much on the JB4 E85, but looking forward to some E85 maps for the Procede. Rumor has it 50/50 makes some really good power over pump alone.

Anyway, nice pull. Hopefully you logged. I'm sure a few guys will want to see the logs and can provide you with some good advise. Need to remember with high compression and high boost, your spark gap needs to be reduced. This can have an impact on your dyno numbers at high RPM...

BEAR-AvHistory · 05-16-2012, 05:13 PM

What octane? Also a base line is good to have to see an apples to apples increase with the new gear.

My JB4 on 94 octane did 365whp on a dynojet with the old non-335is map.

Have not run the new 335is Map 6 yet. Car had no other mods on the dyno run.

335twins · 05-16-2012, 06:13 PM

I got 350whp with drop in filter and flash (custom flash from a local performance shop), no downpipes and intercooler yet.

Mike@N54Tuning.com · 05-16-2012, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory

What octane? Also a base line is good to have to see an apples to apples increase with the new gear.

My JB4 on 94 octane did 365whp on a dynojet with the old non-335is map.

Have not run the new 335is Map 6 yet. Car had no other mods on the dyno run.

Try the new 5/11 map 5 yet? Might be even stronger!

Mike

BEAR-AvHistory · 05-16-2012, 06:51 PM

I have not tried Map 5. Will take a look, but traction is already a problem

2jzn54 · 05-16-2012, 06:55 PM

Same mods plus an sld/cps module I put out 400 whp 436 tq std i believe on a dj on 93. Fbo no tune as a base 310 whp 310 tq. For what its worth i ran on beat Filters and Oil.. Possibly plugs.. Nothing major but yeah. I've since switched to the new auto tuning map with a 50 50 e85 mix and I refuse to return to 93 only.

E90Company · 05-16-2012, 07:11 PM

The results really vary from dyno to dyno, you need a baseline in order for us to tell you how great of gains you had.

2jzn54 · 05-16-2012, 11:48 PM

yes i should mention your results look good as dyno dynamics generally read 10-12% lower.

05-16-2012, 03:42 PM	#1
buta Registered 0 Rep 1 Posts Drives: E92 335i Join Date: May 2012 Location: Georgia iTrader: (0)	bmw 335i dyno test. what result ? Mods: (JB4) (intake) (Downpipes) (Intercooler) (Exhaust). map2 Is it a good result ?
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

05-16-2012, 04:54 PM	#2
bigdnno98 Real Car Enthusiast 290 Rep 2,088 Posts Drives: 340xi Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Germany iTrader: (8)	What were your baseline numbers?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-16-2012, 05:04 PM	#3
Wedge1967 Banned 125 Rep 2,172 Posts Drives: '07 e92 AT Sport Montego Blue Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Portland, OR iTrader: (3)	Looks good. I'm running a Procede with the same mods and see about the same numbers on a mustang dyno. Dynojet will run higher numbers from what I've seen, but it all depends on calibration. I haven't read much on the JB4 E85, but looking forward to some E85 maps for the Procede. Rumor has it 50/50 makes some really good power over pump alone. Anyway, nice pull. Hopefully you logged. I'm sure a few guys will want to see the logs and can provide you with some good advise. Need to remember with high compression and high boost, your spark gap needs to be reduced. This can have an impact on your dyno numbers at high RPM...
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-16-2012, 05:13 PM	#4
BEAR-AvHistory 2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convt 3178 Rep 5,264 Posts Drives: 2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convrt Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Raleigh, NC - OIB, NC iTrader: (0) Garage List 1965 COBRA (FFR rep ... [8.57] 2023 Jeep Wrangler ... [4.75] 2009 Yamaha V-Star [0.00] Cars 2-BMW, 2-FORD, ... [0.00] 2023 Ford Expeditio ... [0.00] 2020 Z4 M40i [10.00] 2022 BMW M4C [7.25] 1998 FORD Ranger 4X4 [0.00]	What octane? Also a base line is good to have to see an apples to apples increase with the new gear. My JB4 on 94 octane did 365whp on a dynojet with the old non-335is map. Have not run the new 335is Map 6 yet. Car had no other mods on the dyno run. __________________ Kevin Dravit Gray, Black Leather, Moonlight Roof, Red Calipers 2022 M4C - 2020 Z4 M40i - 2023 FORD Expedition XLT Max 4X4 400BHP - 2009 V-Star - 1998 Ranger 4X4 5MT - 1965 Cobra (R) 5MT - 2023 Jeep Wrangler Sport S 6MT
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-16-2012, 06:13 PM	#5
335twins Captain 149 Rep 737 Posts Drives: 2020 x3 M40i, 2019 M2Comp Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: AZ iTrader: (1)	I got 350whp with drop in filter and flash (custom flash from a local performance shop), no downpipes and intercooler yet.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-16-2012, 06:51 PM	#7
BEAR-AvHistory 2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convt 3178 Rep 5,264 Posts Drives: 2020 Z4 M40i - 2022 M4C Convrt Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Raleigh, NC - OIB, NC iTrader: (0) Garage List 1965 COBRA (FFR rep ... [8.57] 2023 Jeep Wrangler ... [4.75] 2009 Yamaha V-Star [0.00] Cars 2-BMW, 2-FORD, ... [0.00] 2023 Ford Expeditio ... [0.00] 2020 Z4 M40i [10.00] 2022 BMW M4C [7.25] 1998 FORD Ranger 4X4 [0.00]	I have not tried Map 5. Will take a look, but traction is already a problem __________________ Kevin Dravit Gray, Black Leather, Moonlight Roof, Red Calipers 2022 M4C - 2020 Z4 M40i - 2023 FORD Expedition XLT Max 4X4 400BHP - 2009 V-Star - 1998 Ranger 4X4 5MT - 1965 Cobra (R) 5MT - 2023 Jeep Wrangler Sport S 6MT
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-16-2012, 06:55 PM	#8
2jzn54 Captain 42 Rep 823 Posts Drives: 07 E90 335i 6MT Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: United States iTrader: (6)	Same mods plus an sld/cps module I put out 400 whp 436 tq std i believe on a dj on 93. Fbo no tune as a base 310 whp 310 tq. For what its worth i ran on beat Filters and Oil.. Possibly plugs.. Nothing major but yeah. I've since switched to the new auto tuning map with a 50 50 e85 mix and I refuse to return to 93 only.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-16-2012, 07:11 PM	#9
E90Company Major General 200 Rep 6,136 Posts Drives: Car Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: FL iTrader: (2)	The results really vary from dyno to dyno, you need a baseline in order for us to tell you how great of gains you had.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-16-2012, 11:48 PM	#10
2jzn54 Captain 42 Rep 823 Posts Drives: 07 E90 335i 6MT Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: United States iTrader: (6)	yes i should mention your results look good as dyno dynamics generally read 10-12% lower.
	Appreciate 0 Quote