[dzenno]

Originally Posted by MuCcIo

LOL dzenno, I don't have to convince anyone, i'm simply explain various possibility.
I've simply done 4 run, 2vs2, and both2by2 are pretty similar... Maybe i had favoured wind?? Sure, btw i've simply done them and imported them in VirtualDyno.

Sure man, that's cool...enjoy it! Going to the track any time soon, that car should trap mid 120s...with 20psi and race gas...basically an upgraded turbo car lol

[Clap135]

quck question, you are a MT car right?

[FedeM]

Originally Posted by dzenno

Sure man, that's cool...enjoy it! Going to the track any time soon, that car should trap mid 120s...with 20psi and race gas...basically an upgraded turbo car lol

I don't have a good tyres to do that, i'm actually on 245/35 Falken FK-452.
I'll can get a good 100-200kmh time... I'm planning to buy a 10hz gps, like pbox.
BTW, I don't expect a really good time... When i made these logs my autotuning is really at the limit... Simply if I put in 4th, he drops autotuned boost because IAT come to raise up.
I'm sure if I make a virtualdyno on 4th, it results 20whp less.

Originally Posted by Clap135

quck question, you are a MT car right?

Yessir.

[FedeM]

Ok, same graph here:

With correct weight:








With correct weight and correction 1.07 (instead of Dynojet@1.09) to be under 290whp on map0:

[Clap135]

You have correction factors applied? Why. run it with 1.00 as those are the true numbers your car is putting out. I didnt know you applied factors lol. With a 1.0CF you will be 30 whp less, which is where you should be on your tuned run.

[Joshboody]

phew, glad that got worked out. its a more consistent comparison tool then using different dynos... if everyone uses the same parameters and tries to find a flat road.

[FedeM]

Originally Posted by Clap135

You have correction factors applied? Why. run it with 1.00 as those are the true numbers your car is putting out. I didnt know you applied factors lol. With a 1.0CF you will be 30 whp less, which is where you should be on your tuned run.

Dynojet in VirtualDyno has (as standard) a CF of 1.09...
Mustand Dyno, for example, has 0.95...

[Clap135]

Actually I just realized that 1.09 is standard for whatever reason. So I am still at a loss here aside from the op going down a hill.
Either way, dzenno said it best. You want to believe this, more power to you lol. However reality will say other wise

[enrita]

my car put down on a real dyno stock boost FBO 272 whp so not that far from what shown from Muccio on map 0

[FedeM]

Originally Posted by Clap135

Actually I just realized that 1.09 is standard for whatever reason. So I am still at a loss here aside from the op going down a hill.
Either way, dzenno said it best. You want to believe this, more power to you lol. However reality will say other wise

Really, I haven't noticed that.
BTW, I'll do some logs in both directions on the same street... I think it's the only way to get something reliable out.

[Jeff@TopGearSolutions]

Anyone want to tell me how to get this to work on the PRocede Log. I dont feel like reading and thinking right now

[FedeM]

Originally Posted by Jeff@topgearsolutions

Anyone want to tell me how to get this to work on the PRocede Log. I dont feel like reading and thinking right now

Sure: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=153

You can find my bank account in PM.

[enrita]

Originally Posted by Jeff@topgearsolutions

Anyone want to tell me how to get this to work on the PRocede Log. I dont feel like reading and thinking right now

check your sales mail

[Jeff@TopGearSolutions]

Thanks guys! Clap got it! I appreciate your fast responses though. I'm curious where 17 psi meth/tune only stacks up in 100 degree weather LOL

[Big Tom]

Originally Posted by MuCcIo

PS: how much IAT there was when you dyno ur 335i?? What gear did you use?? Can you post your log with IAT and all datas?? It's a lot important too.
PPS: are you sure u were running with 98AKI?? Maybe 98RON, like usa's 93AKI... I was on 95AKI/100RON.

Oops, my mistake... I meant RON.
I used 3rd gear.