[Lambobimmer]

I probably should have cooled down my intercooler before I got on the dyno, oh well. I guess that I probably would have seen slightly higher numbers if I would have. I logged my dyno runs and charge air temps were between 95 and 105. However, I can't imagine having a tune that is smoother than this one. Dzenno did a great job on my car. Look how good that dyno graph looks!

Dyno run was with the following mods:

93 Octane
Stock Turbos
DTC
HPF FMIC
AR DP's
Remis Exhaust
Drop-In Filter

[Tiago@VRSF]

Nice numbers, post up a log on datazap.me when you get a chance!

[jayzF30]

Those are some nice numbers for 93 and high intake temps but even more impressive as you mentioned is just how smooth that graph is. Just incredible.

[blisstik]

Must be fun in that car! Got an LSD too?

[AlpineSwift]

Drop in filter? Nice! What does your boost and wgdc look like?

[CalmLikeABomb]

???? ots cobb stage 2 + fmic SPORT (91 octane) i dyno'd 360hp/407tq
vrsf dp, *AFE stage 2 DCI* hehe, vrsf fmic, vrsf exhaust, vrsf cp/tial bov,

[Deebo]

Nice, love that body style Z4. Do you have access to E85?

[carlsontheflyer]

Dzenno is great!

We are still working of fine-tuning the map for my car. It's based off Cobb Stage1 + FMIC Agressive map.

Here is the latest graph in Virtual Dyno.

[Lambobimmer]

Originally Posted by Deebo

Nice, love that body style Z4. Do you have access to E85?

Yes. I plan on having him build me an Ethanol/93 Octane map.

[Lambobimmer]

Originally Posted by CalmLikeABomb

???? ots cobb stage 2 + fmic SPORT (91 octane) i dyno'd 360hp/407tq
vrsf dp, *AFE stage 2 DCI* hehe, vrsf fmic, vrsf exhaust, vrsf cp/tial bov,

I put my car on the Dyno after driving 20 minutes without cooling down the Intercooler. Numbers would probably be closer to 385hp and 420tq with lower temps. I don't really care about the raw numbers because there is not a lot of consistency from dyno to dyno.

For example my previous 135i put down 371 and 417tq on a Mustang Dyno. This was also on 93 octane and a OTS Cobb Stage 2 map.

http://www.1addicts.com/forums/showthread.php?t=706301

[CalmLikeABomb]

Why don't u go e85 pro tune... it is more cost efficient because the ots #'s are close to if not better.

[foghat]

Originally Posted by CalmLikeABomb

Why don't u go e85 pro tune... it is more cost efficient because the ots #'s are close to if not better.

You can't really compare dyno numbers like that - even though we all do.

Ideally op would have had a baseline number on that dyno so we could see what the gains are. But I guarantee you that he did not lose hp over teh ots maps after dzenno got his hands on it.

Plus, everyone is too caught up on peak numbers. My ptf tune only gained about 13whp peak over cobb stage 2 aggressive. But the area under the curve had incredible gains - about 20-30 hp from about 2500rpm to 5400rpm when compared to the stage 2 aggressive.

And it is a shitload smoother than the ots maps - even if there was no hp gain, custom ptf map would have been worth it.