E90Post
 


The Tire Rack
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > More JB2R test results: 12.628 @ 113.29 on street radials.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      11-20-2007, 03:27 PM   #23
Terry335
Banned
United_States
104
Rep
2,587
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Socal

iTrader: (0)

Our JB development rig has a microcontroller that runs cps in/out, IAT in/out, map in/out, and right/left wideband taps. We can map boost, fuel, and CPS offset based on rpm, boost, and IAT, in 50 rpm increments.

During development I tested a variety of different maps ranging from 15psi in the midrange, down to 6psi in the midrange, and decided on a final design that we felt would most appeal to consumers in this market. A stock feeling powerband, zero chance for cel/limp, easy install, and tremendous value.
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2007, 04:35 PM   #24
hotrod182
.
hotrod182's Avatar
878
Rep
3,994
Posts

Drives: 2023 i4 M50
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry335 View Post
Our JB development rig has a microcontroller that runs cps in/out, IAT in/out, map in/out, and right/left wideband taps. We can map boost, fuel, and CPS offset based on rpm, boost, and IAT, in 50 rpm increments.

During development I tested a variety of different maps ranging from 15psi in the midrange, down to 6psi in the midrange, and decided on a final design that we felt would most appeal to consumers in this market. A stock feeling powerband, zero chance for cel/limp, easy install, and tremendous value.
On the R tune, the car feels much more responsive and torquey down low. It is just a smooth strong push at part throttle. It became even smoother on the 2nd day. Its nice to have low end part throttle torque, but really not that necessary with really aggressive driving, because I would hardly have my rpms that low for very long any ways. Thats what is nice about the 6 spd trans. 1st gear is fairly low, and upper rpms are accessible at just about any given speed. Just having higher boost come on down low, and accessing it so frequently will probably just decrease your city gas mileage incrementally. In some way, launching with high torque is almost easier if you know how to modulate the throttle. Kind of comparing launching a S2000 Honda against a big V8 engined car.

I think Sacramento is a 6hr drive from here. So as tempting as it sounds, probably not happening soon. So yes Driver 72, it would be nice to see how the Procede 1.47 runs at Fontana. If you still run 13.0 @ 107 there, then it will affirm your belief that the track is similar to Famosa. However, you should run a little faster with the V 1.47 compared to the 1.2X? Maybe 108mph? Again, it would be interesting for the sake of analysis.

Fontana is ridiculous how they wont let you run a minute before 10am. As the temps get warmer and warmer! That day when I left, the temps were about 88F. Started at about 77F. Besides the elevation, there is a huge difference in cooler weather. Cooler intake, more effective intercooler, etc, etc.

Are you sure the track at LACR doesn't drop in elevation? The first picture is LACR. It definitely doesnt look uphill till past the 1/4 marker. Maybe you Googled the very end of the track! By comparison I have included a picture of the Fontana picture again for comparison.
Attached Images
  
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2007, 05:04 PM   #25
Nikolas
Colonel
313
Rep
2,576
Posts

Drives: 996 TT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sierra Mountains

iTrader: (0)

4 feet over a 1/4 mile is hard for the human eye to register. Also, Google Earth is not that accurate for measuring elevation in this manner. I use that program daily and there are many areas that the elevation can be really off, especially in areas that have lots of terrain change.
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2007, 05:57 PM   #26
Driver72
Brigadier General
351
Rep
4,484
Posts

Drives: 335i - to new owners now.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Hotrod, to be honest, the picture of Fontana looks pretty darn flat to me.
The angle of the picture makes it hard to see, you'd need to be higher and more at a side angle like the LACR picture.

Now I don't know about the LACR.

As you know I've been there many, many times.
In that picture it "appears" to run downhill but again that may just be an illusion from the angle and the upward incline near the end.

I've used Google Earth many times before too and the elevation seems pretty good, but can't vouch for every location.

I've checked it on my road out front of my house, which has an incline, and it shows the incline.
I've checked it in other areas where I know for a fact the road is not level, and sure enough Google Earth shows it.

I've also checked it on roads that I know are pretty level, but have a large dip in them at certain points and Google Earth has showed that too.

But again, I doubt it's perfect for every location and elevation, so you never know. But it's the best we have at the moment.

Unless someone has a Chrysler or Dodge with their Navigation system.
I test drove a 300C when they came out with it's GPS and loved the fact it had an elevation meter built into it.
It was impressive to see the elevation change on that thing as you drove down the road. Go up a hill and it showed your elevation instantly.

Maybe someone with this could someday test out Fontana and see what it says at the starting line and as they cross the finish line?
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2007, 06:01 PM   #27
Terry335
Banned
United_States
104
Rep
2,587
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Socal

iTrader: (0)

Hmm is there a portable thing like that I can buy and throw in the car?
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2007, 06:01 PM   #28
Driver72
Brigadier General
351
Rep
4,484
Posts

Drives: 335i - to new owners now.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

BTW all, on the LACR site, it states the Antelope Valley Committee is in contact with the County of Los Angeles to try to find a NEW place to build a NEW drag strip!
We may have a sweet new strip in the coming year or two, or three.
That would be GREAT.

I'm sure it won't be anywhere near sea level though, as that would be costly and no space.
But if they looked up towards Castiac or somewhere north of Santa Clarita up the 5, it would be better than the 2700+ feet of Palmdale (it would be closer to 1500-2000' and if they made the strip run DOWNHILL by about 3-4 feet from start to finish and made it run east too, that would counteract the elevation quite a bit and balance it out to make it a nice place to go!
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2007, 06:02 PM   #29
Driver72
Brigadier General
351
Rep
4,484
Posts

Drives: 335i - to new owners now.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry335 View Post
Hmm is there a portable thing like that I can buy and throw in the car?
I would think there is.
Maybe even the base Garmin or something would have it.
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2007, 11:30 PM   #30
hotrod182
.
hotrod182's Avatar
878
Rep
3,994
Posts

Drives: 2023 i4 M50
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

My M3 has elevation built into it's navigation system. It is generally accurate, but sometimes you can go up/down sudden changes in elevation, and the GPS won't accurately pick it up. It seems to have a resolution of 1/8 mile distances or so.

If you look carefully at the Fontana track barriers, you can see how they clearly go in an uphill direction.

We really need a car comparable to Shivs to run at Fontana to quantify the performance decreases due to the inferior DA.

I can only emphasize how remarkable CEA's and Terrys numbers were at Fontana. If they had run in cooler, low elevation conditions, I am sure their times would have been much better. Most definitely below 12.40 in the 1/4 mile.
Appreciate 0
      11-20-2007, 11:54 PM   #31
sambonator
Samtaro!
sambonator's Avatar
United_States
128
Rep
2,609
Posts

Drives: 2014 F32 N55 Alpinweiß
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Newport Beach, CA, USA

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry335 View Post
Hmm is there a portable thing like that I can buy and throw in the car?
Terry, I thought you had a VBOX Performance Meter? That should be recording altitude information (recorded as height).

So your 1/4 mile runs logged will show if there was any altitude change throughout the run.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2007, 12:03 AM   #32
stillclaimndp
Dancing Machine
stillclaimndp's Avatar
United_States
50
Rep
1,419
Posts

Drives: 335i e90 ZSP
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Walnut Creek, Ca

iTrader: (0)

damn that thing looks so fast in the youtube video!!!
__________________
2007 e90 & 1981 Corvette Predecessors: 2007 BMW 335i E92, 2006 M5, 2008 Viper SRT10 Coupe, 2005 Viper Yellow, 2006 Corvette Z51, 2009 Challenger SRT8, 2006 S4, 2001.5 Nogaro Blue S4, 2006 GTI w/ DSG, 06 Evo IX, 04 S4, 04 911x51, 03 Evo VIII, 98 Eclipse GSX, 96 GST, 92 Galant Vr-4, '70 Grand Prix Model J, '70 Nova, '68 Firebird
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2007, 12:03 AM   #33
DrewKo
Lieutenant Colonel
DrewKo's Avatar
46
Rep
1,568
Posts

Drives: 335i Montego Blue Saddle Brown
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2007 335i  [0.00]
Terry, I may be mistaken, and if so, no problem, but i find it very hard to believe you are mapping torque when you are simply confusing the ECU in your boost protocol. I suppose you might confuse it to yield the torque parameters of your choosing, but I honestly doubt that is the case.
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2007, 04:18 AM   #34
Terry335
Banned
United_States
104
Rep
2,587
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Socal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sambonator View Post
Terry, I thought you had a VBOX Performance Meter? That should be recording altitude information (recorded as height).

So your 1/4 mile runs logged will show if there was any altitude change throughout the run.
Oh good idea, I'll have to check for that!
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2007, 04:22 AM   #35
Terry335
Banned
United_States
104
Rep
2,587
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Socal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrewKo View Post
Terry, I may be mistaken, and if so, no problem, but i find it very hard to believe you are mapping torque when you are simply confusing the ECU in your boost protocol. I suppose you might confuse it to yield the torque parameters of your choosing, but I honestly doubt that is the case.
Hi Drew, I'm a bit confused by the question. Our development chip allows full control over everything, but when it came to the production JB2 not everything carried over from the development rig. RPM based boost mapping was eliminated from the JB2 because I didn't like the way it made the car feel. I wanted a smooth linear boost curve, not a sudden torque thump, so I went with a +3psi across the board curve. That doesn't mean I can't do it, just means I don't have a tune like that for sale. Who knows maybe down the road if there is enough interest, but I'm telling you it won't be much quicker and will just blow the tires off the line.

There are pics of the development rig (still in my car), our software, etc here. The programming software is proton suite, and scanning software is Auterro Dynoscan

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96380
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2007, 05:52 AM   #36
hotrod182
.
hotrod182's Avatar
878
Rep
3,994
Posts

Drives: 2023 i4 M50
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

I was just thinking that my 113.2mph run is not that bad relative to Shiv's V2.02 running 114.8 mph on non drag radials also. This is considering that I don't have exhaust, a prototype intake system, or 98 octane. I mean, all that is probably worth the 1.6 mph difference. Certainly not what a 50 hp advantage should yield in my opinon.
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2007, 05:53 AM   #37
Former_Boosted_IS
Major General
315
Rep
5,175
Posts

Drives: 4 Wheels
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Planet Earth!

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry335 View Post
Hi Drew, I'm a bit confused by the question. Our development chip allows full control over everything, but when it came to the production JB2 not everything carried over from the development rig. RPM based boost mapping was eliminated from the JB2 because I didn't like the way it made the car feel. I wanted a smooth linear boost curve, not a sudden torque thump, so I went with a +3psi across the board curve. That doesn't mean I can't do it, just means I don't have a tune like that for sale. Who knows maybe down the road if there is enough interest, but I'm telling you it won't be much quicker and will just blow the tires off the line.

There are pics of the development rig (still in my car), our software, etc here. The programming software is proton suite, and scanning software is Auterro Dynoscan

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=96380
Terry, your post is very confusing. Are you talking about testing equipment to measure A/F, etc? It sounds like your JB and JB2 do not have any ability to adjust A/F or boost in rpm increments from your previous posts? Does the JB2 now have a microprocessor that allows these incremental adjustments?
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2007, 06:53 AM   #38
dxb335d
The Tarmac Terrorist
dxb335d's Avatar
England
1015
Rep
29,344
Posts

Drives: 997.2 GT3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ''Fandango Towers''

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Nice one Hotrod

is JB2 very similar too Procede V2.0?? Wonder how you would fair against a stock M5?

Carlos
__________________
997.2 GT3
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2007, 02:00 PM   #39
Nikolas
Colonel
313
Rep
2,576
Posts

Drives: 996 TT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sierra Mountains

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver72 View Post
Hotrod, to be honest, the picture of Fontana looks pretty darn flat to me.
The angle of the picture makes it hard to see, you'd need to be higher and more at a side angle like the LACR picture.

Now I don't know about the LACR.

As you know I've been there many, many times.
In that picture it "appears" to run downhill but again that may just be an illusion from the angle and the upward incline near the end.

I've used Google Earth many times before too and the elevation seems pretty good, but can't vouch for every location.

I've checked it on my road out front of my house, which has an incline, and it shows the incline.
I've checked it in other areas where I know for a fact the road is not level, and sure enough Google Earth shows it.

I've also checked it on roads that I know are pretty level, but have a large dip in them at certain points and Google Earth has showed that too.

But again, I doubt it's perfect for every location and elevation, so you never know. But it's the best we have at the moment.

Unless someone has a Chrysler or Dodge with their Navigation system.
I test drove a 300C when they came out with it's GPS and loved the fact it had an elevation meter built into it.
It was impressive to see the elevation change on that thing as you drove down the road. Go up a hill and it showed your elevation instantly.

Maybe someone with this could someday test out Fontana and see what it says at the starting line and as they cross the finish line?
Google Earth's numbers can be really off from reality, unless you are on an area that is dead flat and that area needs to be much more significant than a 1/4 mile stretch. It is a great tool to get average elevations though, just not exact point elevations. It is an amazing tool for architecture which is what I use if for.
Appreciate 0
      11-21-2007, 02:03 PM   #40
Terry335
Banned
United_States
104
Rep
2,587
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Socal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Former_Boosted_IS View Post
Terry, your post is very confusing. Are you talking about testing equipment to measure A/F, etc? It sounds like your JB and JB2 do not have any ability to adjust A/F or boost in rpm increments from your previous posts? Does the JB2 now have a microprocessor that allows these incremental adjustments?
The JB1 does not have the ability to adjust air/fuel ratios, but the JB2 does. How it actually works is proprietary so I don't release that, but I'm happy to share a dyno showing our air/fuel delta over stock.

Last edited by Terry335; 12-19-2007 at 11:24 AM..
Appreciate 0
      11-23-2007, 10:01 AM   #41
Former_Boosted_IS
Major General
315
Rep
5,175
Posts

Drives: 4 Wheels
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Planet Earth!

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry335 View Post
The JB1 does not have the ability to adjust air/fuel ratios, but the JB2 does. How it actually works is proprietary so I don't release that, but I'm happy to share a dyno showing our air/fuel delta over stock.
I appreciate the dynos Terry and I understand that you are adjusting the A/F ratio. My question is whether you can do adjustments to the A/F in 50 rpm increments like you stated above? Without a processor, there is no way to adjust the A/F in incremental levels. I don't really need to know all the details on how it works, but I am just trying to clear this inconsistency in my mind. I don't have any mods to this car yet and I am still shopping, so this info would be helpful for me.
Appreciate 0
      11-23-2007, 10:35 AM   #42
Terry335
Banned
United_States
104
Rep
2,587
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Socal

iTrader: (0)

The JB2 doesn't have a tach pickup, it's a pretty stripped down version of our development rig. By the time you get a new car we might have something else for you.
Appreciate 0
      11-23-2007, 11:00 AM   #43
Former_Boosted_IS
Major General
315
Rep
5,175
Posts

Drives: 4 Wheels
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Planet Earth!

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry335 View Post
The JB2 doesn't have a tach pickup, it's a pretty stripped down version of our development rig. By the time you get a new car we might have something else for you.
Terry, I do have an '08 335i, but I was just waiting for the break-in to end before I decided on something. My old car was on standalone and it was a non turbo ECU, so things were vastly different. I am trying to decide what is the best option on this car as every single car seems to be so different.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST