|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
FACT
|
|
12-03-2007, 11:58 AM | #1 |
Private
14
Rep 50
Posts |
FACT
Burning one gallon of gas produces 20 pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2).
One tree removes about 10 pounds of carbon dioxide per YEAR. http://www.greenuniversity.net/Green...bondioxide.htm http://www.tufts.edu/tie/tci/sequestration.htm |
12-03-2007, 12:09 PM | #2 |
Second Lieutenant
121
Rep 227
Posts |
Most of us dont drive extremely fuel efficient cars (ie prius), but at least we dont drive hummers or yukon xl's.
__________________
2017 M3 ZCP
Mineral Grey/Black DCT |
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2007, 12:11 PM | #4 |
Too many Alex's, from now on, call me Beaufort
355
Rep 6,188
Posts |
Ever thought about how much of that Co2 is put back into the environment when those trees are now burned as firewood?
__________________
13 HD FatBob
17 A4 Glacier/Black 1st Edition/Pre+/Sport/EurocodeTMD/Racechip 16 S6 (gone),14 S6 (gone),14 S6 (gone),13 S6 (gone),10 S4 (gone) 07 335i(gone) |
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2007, 12:20 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant General
1725
Rep 14,825
Posts |
2/3 cup of coffee grounds is the proper amount to use in a 12 cup coffee maker, when making 12 cups and using two teaspoons per 6 oz. of coffee. Figured I'd share as long as we are talking about useless observations...
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2007, 01:49 PM | #6 |
pull my finger to get your kinder® surprise
150
Rep 10,455
Posts |
just for you, tonight, I'll leave my car idling all night long. Oh, and I"ll let my gas-guzzling SUV idle too, I love the smell of burnt fossil fuel, YUMMY
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2007, 02:03 PM | #7 |
Too many Alex's, from now on, call me Beaufort
355
Rep 6,188
Posts |
Hater.
__________________
13 HD FatBob
17 A4 Glacier/Black 1st Edition/Pre+/Sport/EurocodeTMD/Racechip 16 S6 (gone),14 S6 (gone),14 S6 (gone),13 S6 (gone),10 S4 (gone) 07 335i(gone) |
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2007, 02:28 PM | #9 |
Colonel
313
Rep 2,576
Posts |
On a serious note, there are so many people removing their cats on these cars. On my old subaru I did the same and in the end regretted it. In most cases if people went with a high flow cat that meets EPA standards, they would only have approximately 5 whp less than no cats. At least this was the case with the STI.
Some states are really strict with regards to modifications to cars such as California. Recentely the CHP is being funded to find these modified cars and can legally pull you over if they think you have modified the emissions system in a car. Running no cats is easy as you can smell the fuel. Those cars are then sent to the state air quality emissions referee station to verify the car is in stock condition. If it is not, there are huge fines and a smog recheck yearly. The federal fine for modifying exhausts out of compliance is huge - somewhere in the $10,000 range if I remember correctly. At any rate, it is something to consider. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2007, 02:34 PM | #10 | |
Too many Alex's, from now on, call me Beaufort
355
Rep 6,188
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
13 HD FatBob
17 A4 Glacier/Black 1st Edition/Pre+/Sport/EurocodeTMD/Racechip 16 S6 (gone),14 S6 (gone),14 S6 (gone),13 S6 (gone),10 S4 (gone) 07 335i(gone) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2007, 04:02 PM | #12 |
pull my finger to get your kinder® surprise
150
Rep 10,455
Posts |
there is? lead me to those extra trees, I'm going to chop them down and use as firewood
to the OP, it's not like people are blind to the problem of polution and the whole global warming debate.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2007, 07:49 PM | #13 |
Colonel
313
Rep 2,576
Posts |
Ya, because nothing on this forum is ever discussed more than once!:sad0147:
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-03-2007, 09:28 PM | #14 |
Major General
438
Rep 6,967
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|