![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Boost loss with meth injection
![]() |
![]() |
05-10-2017, 11:48 PM | #1 |
Warrant Officer
![]() 381
Rep 1,340
Posts |
Boost loss with meth injection
I got a new meth injection controller (Torqbyte) and have been running some logs with a map I created. I am basing the injection off boost and RPM, beginning from 20 PSI and also 2500 RPM. The system is 2 500CC nozzles, with begin duty percentage of 30, and maximum is at 40 PSI. 70% ratio is used as well.
On 3rd gear pulls, I've logged that the turbo pressure begins at 36 PSI from 3k RPM, then linearly drops to 28 PSI at 4.9k RPM. This hasn't happened when I am not spraying methanol. Would the EGT's be going too high and power is cut? I actually haven't checked them when I am going full force on the car.
__________________
Deleted, ATM I/C and tuned by B.R.R.
|
05-11-2017, 03:23 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 168
Rep 460
Posts |
Interesting. Maybe need to get your boost up and full duty earlier.
Here's my current graph, runs spectacular throughout. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2017, 07:49 AM | #4 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 168
Rep 460
Posts |
Lots of guys on here get long cranks/hard starts with meth. If your spraying heavy all the time this will happen (especially without a non meth clear-out pull) I've noticed if you bring the boost up with adequate rpm you'll see these problems virtually disappear. I'm running the hybrids but your graph should probably look similar to mine.
I see a lot of people injecting at lower boost (which is fine for Cbu cleanup) but hard starts will be more evident since less WM is properly combusted. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2017, 08:28 AM | #6 |
NY BRAVEST
![]() 47
Rep 231
Posts |
Matty, maybe you have to turn 1 nozzle 4clicks clockwise the other 4 counter😜😜😜😜😜😜😜 sorry inside joke guys with matt
|
Appreciate
1
WreckerX5d380.50 |
05-12-2017, 08:54 AM | #7 | |
Colonel
![]() 627
Rep 2,408
Posts |
Quote:
I switched to solenoids placed close to the nozzles, which in my testing had very similar improvements shown in this video. This eliminated the long crank start issue for me.
__________________
2011 335d 11.68 @ 125.71 mph 1/4 mile NHRA certified track
Ram Cummins with lots-o-mods |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2017, 09:03 AM | #8 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 303
Rep 1,606
Posts |
Mtysolenoid is about a foot away from my nozzle. Maybe my solenoid is leaking internally. I know it drips frpm my connection to externally. Second one I have purchased already. Will be switching to a snow performance unit.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2017, 09:17 AM | #9 | |
Warrant Officer
![]() 381
Rep 1,340
Posts |
Quote:
EGT read 950*f by the end of the pull as well.
__________________
Deleted, ATM I/C and tuned by B.R.R.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-27-2017, 11:07 PM | #10 |
Warrant Officer
![]() 381
Rep 1,340
Posts |
I monitored this again at the track last week. So far the results were..
2nd-4th gear, 34psi sloping to 31.5psi 5th gear, 37psi to 35psi. EGT on the runs were 400*f and 1050*f at the end. Coolant temps were 165*f to 192*f at the end. AFR's hovered around 13 to 14.5 the entire time. Am I over thinking this? Or are there some things I am uneducated about and need to research more into. The increase in pressure for 5th gear is something I am not understanding.
__________________
Deleted, ATM I/C and tuned by B.R.R.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2017, 07:15 AM | #11 | |
Colonel
![]() 627
Rep 2,408
Posts |
Quote:
As an example from my logs of the 1/4 mile (http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...0&postcount=20) you can see that my boost also rises as the gears increase (3rd is higher tha 2nd, 4th higher than 3rd, 5th higher than 4th), but the CACT's are also rising. I can take these logged parameters and put them into matchbot and see that the airflow in lb/min is basically the same for all these gears at a given rpm, even though boost is different. It's the CACT affect that is balancing the boost change. So, the evaporative cooling of the water/methanol injection can definitely impact your boost readings, because it can have a big impact on your CACT's. Note: If your water/methanol injection nozzle is not in front of your CACT sensor, you won't be able to measure the CACT reduction benefit, and that will screw up your use of matchbot (or other engine simulator) because you won't have the correct CACT info.
__________________
2011 335d 11.68 @ 125.71 mph 1/4 mile NHRA certified track
Ram Cummins with lots-o-mods |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-28-2017, 07:44 PM | #13 |
Warrant Officer
![]() 381
Rep 1,340
Posts |
@TDIwyse CACT did not go above 130*f. I monitored it but did not log during the pulls. I haven't researched it but would that much temp increase over the 65*f ambient equate to the psi increase?
335dsleeper I monitored boost via the torqbyte log software, which is directly pulling the reading off the cold side intake pipe.
__________________
Deleted, ATM I/C and tuned by B.R.R.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-29-2017, 04:17 PM | #14 | |
Colonel
![]() 627
Rep 2,408
Posts |
Quote:
For example, using matchbot and taking one of my top end data points at 4862 rpm and then comparing the impact of a ~42.5 deg F increase in CACT (100 vs 142 F ... tweaked the IC efficiency to do that), shows the engine would need ~4.5 psig more boost to still flow ~64.6 lb/min of air.
__________________
2011 335d 11.68 @ 125.71 mph 1/4 mile NHRA certified track
Ram Cummins with lots-o-mods |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-29-2017, 04:55 PM | #15 | |
Banned
394
Rep 1,622
Posts |
Have you tried verifying boost drop using a mechanical gauge or torque app?
Maybe the torqbyte sensor is getting saturated or something. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|