![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Quick detail: ONR vs FK425
![]() |
![]() |
02-16-2009, 09:01 PM | #1 |
Enlisted Member
![]() 4
Rep 30
Posts |
Quick detail: ONR vs FK425
Hi all experts,
A lot of people recommend FK425 as quick detail, I am interested to try it out. But I also have ONR, is it really make a big difference to use FK425, compare with ONR (diluted for QD purpose)? Anyone tried both and can give me some comments? Thx. Dk |
02-16-2009, 10:30 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 54
Rep 1,928
Posts |
onr is not a quick detail.. do some research.. damn.. there is info all over the place on this stuff.
basically you put it in a bucket the other bucket is for rinse.. it takes the place if the hose.. you only need two buckets of water. fk425 is a great anti static qd..it adds no gloss though..nothing and i personally prefer the optimum qd over it.. it adds gloss and crazy slickness and doesn't attract pollen or dust. fk425 is just for the antistatic property and that's it..i was soo disappointed when i got it and i live in an area with pollen and dust..though not this time of year. i was pissed i bought a gallon and a big bottle and even a spall one to transer into.. i prefer cg speedwipe.. the pink one..it is antistatic and adds some gloss. fk 425 is a good product just highly over rated imo.. doesn't do much for me. and i have tried every major qd on the market and then some.. try the optimum qd it rocks!! detailersdomain sells it. and there is a discount for forum members. |
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|