catless 93octane PROcede v3.2 dyno results!

mkPOTO · 02-25-2009, 02:43 PM

very nice numbers..

TheAcAvenger · 02-25-2009, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zsapphire7

would HFCs do the job in the rear?

Do they make bolt on HFCs for this car yet? I scrapped stock catted midpipes when I went with the 2nd cat delete midpipes and it would be a whole lot more convenient to sub in secondary HFCs than it would be to swap out the downpipes for inspection

Vicko · 02-25-2009, 03:41 PM

Shiv.
Iam running stage 2 whith UR cai, cattless dps AND 2dry catts deleted on a stock exhaust.
93oct on a 88+deg average wheather.

Is it ok to run stage 2 or should it be better to run stage 1??

cohen4 · 02-25-2009, 03:56 PM

sick numbers!

NatesGr8 · 02-25-2009, 04:12 PM

talk about thread jack with all the cat questions, someone should start a new thread for that. back on topic...nice numbers, and even nicer dyno charts.

it will be interesting to see what she does with that upgraded fmic. whats the ETA for that thing anyway?

Kbueno · 02-25-2009, 05:17 PM

From the v3.2 thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by 335lvr

FYI: I had to lower my user torque down to 88% on Stage 1 Doomsday. There was a noticeable hesitation and surge around 4k. Using Shell 91.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

There should be no surge or hesitation anywhere. And lowering UT by 2% shouldn't make any significant difference. I think something else is going on.

shiv

Shiv: please explain why this dyno exhibits the same behavior that I had with the 90% UT setting. There is clearly a surge at 4k....mine never adapted enough for me not to notice until I reduced the UT setting. Also, dyno shows oscillation under 4k. These curves look pretty choppy to me.

jpsimon · 02-25-2009, 05:21 PM

did you bother to read what I wrote in my original post? The surge you see is from a very un-adapted map. If you look at the other graphs which are more adapted you can see how that surge isn't there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 335lvr

From the v3.2 thread:

Shiv: please explain why this dyno exhibits the same behavior that I had with the 90% UT setting. There is clearly a surge at 4k....mine never adapted enough for me not to notice until I reduced the UT setting. Also, dyno shows oscillation under 4k. These curves look pretty choppy to me.

this was the last run of the day, car was heatsoaked so it wasn't making as much power, but you can see how that surge disappeared... still not fully adapted though

WCM3 · 02-25-2009, 05:29 PM

I want AWD.

Very sick. I'm getting so confused with all this stuff out now. Is the Rev II the same as V3? And is the V3 the same as the V3.2?

And don't get me started on JB1, JB2, JB3, JB+, blah blah..

Kbueno · 02-25-2009, 05:30 PM

Understood. But I'm not seeing the adaptation/smoothing with 90% UT on my car.

Where's the surge in this log that was not adapted?

Just trying to understand here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpsimon

I'm loving the latest maps Shiv! The boost is so nice and steady even after zero adaptation time.. this log was done immediately after loading the map (nonDD stage 2, default settings).

jpsimon · 02-25-2009, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WCM3

I want AWD.

Very sick. I'm getting so confused with all this stuff out now. Is the Rev II the same as V3? And is the V3 the same as the V3.2?

And don't get me started on JB1, JB2, JB3, JB+, blah blah..

v3.2 is the software, rev I vs. rev II is the hardware. v3.2 works on both rev 1 and 2... same maps for both right now

jpsimon · 02-25-2009, 05:36 PM

Well it's hard to compare a road datalog vs. dyno graph. I should have datalogged during the dyno but i was too lazy/tired. For what it's worth, i wasn't feeling any surge at 4k during that datalog you referenced

Quote:

Originally Posted by 335lvr

Understood. But I'm not seeing the adaptation/smoothing with 90% UT on my car.

Where's the surge in this log that was not adapted?

Just trying to understand here.

scottp999 · 02-25-2009, 05:38 PM

Great results. I'm still keeping mods simple until the warranty is gone.

Kbueno · 02-25-2009, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpsimon

Well it's hard to compare a road datalog vs. dyno graph. I should have datalogged during the dyno but i was too lazy/tired. For what it's worth, i wasn't feeling any surge at 4k during that datalog you referenced

Yah, and it looks like you went WOT right at 4k on that log. Just want an explanation of the unsteadiness of boost below 4k as well. I can see the boost dancing on my gauge, but I don't always feel it...maybe that's fine, I'm no tuner.

1clean335i · 02-25-2009, 06:22 PM

congrats! i cant wait to be in the 400whp club

dlbrooks18 · 02-25-2009, 06:29 PM

Wow, those are some impressive numbers. thanks for the post! Yes dp's do really make a difference

stillclaimndp · 02-25-2009, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlbrooks18

Wow, those are some impressive numbers. thanks for the post! Yes dp's do really make a difference

+1. Can't wait to get back into a 335i! (weeks away!)

Sniz · 02-25-2009, 11:23 PM

very nice numbers man...and for AWD even...wow

Aridk · 02-26-2009, 05:21 AM

Wow impressive considering the drivetrain loss from 4wd

hotrod182 · 02-26-2009, 09:32 AM

What were the ambient temperatures out there? Cold temps make all the difference in the world. In driving, I notice more of a power increase from colder temps than I do from raising the boost a bit.

Sniz · 02-26-2009, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hotrod182

What were the ambient temperatures out there? Cold temps make all the difference in the world. In driving, I notice more of a power increase from colder temps than I do from raising the boost a bit.

absolutely, ambient temps in the shop would help.

Cold air = power

luckily JP has AWD which = traction

jpsimon · 02-26-2009, 10:10 AM

it was cold, about 35° or so. Thats why there was a big difference between my uncorrected and the STD 408 -> 390

02-25-2009, 02:43 PM	#23
mkPOTO Mr. Nice Says Hello 661 Rep 16,661 Posts Drives: BMW M3 \| X5 xdrive 35i MSport Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: USA iTrader: (25) Garage List 2002 Lexus GS300 [0.00] 2008 BMW E92 M3 [5.58]	very nice numbers..
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-25-2009, 03:41 PM	#25
Vicko Private First Class 3 Rep 183 Posts Drives: 335i coupe 6mt Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: San Juan,PR iTrader: (0)	Shiv. Iam running stage 2 whith UR cai, cattless dps AND 2dry catts deleted on a stock exhaust. 93oct on a 88+deg average wheather. Is it ok to run stage 2 or should it be better to run stage 1??
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-25-2009, 03:56 PM	#26
cohen4 Member 11 Rep 168 Posts Drives: 08' 335i cp Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Ft. lauderdale, FL iTrader: (0)	sick numbers! __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-25-2009, 04:12 PM	#27
NatesGr8 Private First Class 3 Rep 164 Posts Drives: 05 Legacy GT Join Date: May 2008 Location: Earth iTrader: (0)	talk about thread jack with all the cat questions, someone should start a new thread for that. back on topic...nice numbers, and even nicer dyno charts. it will be interesting to see what she does with that upgraded fmic. whats the ETA for that thing anyway? __________________ JPSIMON's personal mechanic
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-25-2009, 05:29 PM	#30
WCM3 Î canŧ főcus mŷ attėntĭon 81 Rep 1,407 Posts Drives: 13 Rubicon Join Date: May 2008 Location: Morgantown, Pa iTrader: (7)	I want AWD. Very sick. I'm getting so confused with all this stuff out now. Is the Rev II the same as V3? And is the V3 the same as the V3.2? And don't get me started on JB1, JB2, JB3, JB+, blah blah.. __________________ 2011 M3 Coupe - Individual Fire Orange/Black Novillo Extended Leather, 6MT, Mode Carbon, Eisenmann Race, BBS CH-R, BC Coil-overs (Sold) 1995 M3 Coupe - Avus/Hurricane, AEM EMS, Precision Turbo, Boostlogic, H&R, Fikse FM/5, MaxVelocity, Maximum PSI, 20% Tint, etc etc..(Sold) 2009 M3 Coupe - AW/Fox Red, 6MT, Carbon Roof, Shadow Trim, etc (Sold)
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-25-2009, 05:38 PM	#34
scottp999 Brigadier General 138 Rep 4,764 Posts Drives: 4runner SR5 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: MD iTrader: (2) Garage List 2007 BMW 335 [9.00]	Great results. I'm still keeping mods simple until the warranty is gone.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-25-2009, 06:22 PM	#36
1clean335i Perf BMW mag issue 147, 159 435 Rep 6,799 Posts Drives: Project Estoril Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Miami, FL iTrader: (31) Garage List 2013 335i M-sport [0.00] 2011 X5 xdrive35i M ... [0.00] 2009 335i M-sport [0.00] 07' 335i Sedan [0.00]	congrats! i cant wait to be in the 400whp club __________________ '13 Estoril Blue 335i M-sport *Don't PM me!* Message me here- http://www.facebook.com/ProjectEstoril
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-25-2009, 06:29 PM	#37
dlbrooks18 Brigadier General 164 Rep 3,735 Posts Drives: e90 335i Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Los Angeles iTrader: (2)	Wow, those are some impressive numbers. thanks for the post! Yes dp's do really make a difference
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-25-2009, 11:23 PM	#39
Sniz Lieutenant General 715 Rep 10,584 Posts Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Ellicott City, MD iTrader: (1)	very nice numbers man...and for AWD even...wow __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-26-2009, 05:21 AM	#40
Aridk Lieutenant 8 Rep 520 Posts Drives: 335i Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Denmark iTrader: (0)	Wow impressive considering the drivetrain loss from 4wd
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-26-2009, 09:32 AM	#41
hotrod182 . 1015 Rep 4,029 Posts Drives: 2023 i4 M50 Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: California iTrader: (0)	What were the ambient temperatures out there? Cold temps make all the difference in the world. In driving, I notice more of a power increase from colder temps than I do from raising the boost a bit. __________________ 2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph 2019 i3s Terra, 2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph 2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds 2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy)
	Appreciate 0 Quote

02-26-2009, 10:10 AM	#43
jpsimon Team Zissou 3200 Rep 10,200 Posts Drives: 2022 AWD M3 Comp - SMB Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: CT iTrader: (7)	it was cold, about 35° or so. Thats why there was a big difference between my uncorrected and the STD 408 -> 390
	Appreciate 0 Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search