|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
The skinny on diagnostic invisibility
|
|
05-12-2008, 12:33 AM | #45 |
Major General
108
Rep 8,327
Posts |
A great read Shiv. Much appreciated.
__________________
Legal Disclaimer: Anything I or anyone else says about my vehicle on this website(e90post.com or any affiliated or nonaffiliated sites), pertaining to modifications, is only to gain acceptance from my/our peers, and does not actually represent anything actually existing on my car, and thus, cannot be held against me in any issues, i.e. warranty claims, that may arise.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 01:53 AM | #47 |
Chief Shark Officer
5
Rep 154
Posts |
Shiv,
Just to let you know that the ECU doesn't need to see "fuel demand" to estimate the torque output of the ECU. EVERYTHING is mapped in MSD80. 2 Megabytes of code space - 256 K of Cal data. Jim |
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 06:18 AM | #48 | |
Moderator
282
Rep 4,481
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 11:49 AM | #49 |
Power and Speed
105
Rep 2,197
Posts
Drives: ‘22 Shelby GT500, ‘25 X5 50e, '21 Tacoma TRD OR
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
|
I'm probably just too impatient, but with 29.2 and DME 81 out for a little bit now, I'm surprised we don't have concrete and full answers out now about what exactly the impact is. Lots of good info here about "81 will impact this" or "29.2 will monitor for that" but no real conclusions or proof of what happens, either with the behavior of the car, or with codes - hidden or displayed.
I suppose time will tell. Getting 29.2 on Wednesday makes me have ants in my pants though. |
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 12:24 PM | #51 | |
Moderator
282
Rep 4,481
Posts |
Quote:
Now, when you bring your car to the dealership, this record will be checked and the changes will be applied. In case the record says "update progman to v29.2", they will do it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 12:27 PM | #52 | |
Brigadier General
551
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Quote:
You need the following (feel free to volunteer).... You need a car with a tune with MSD81 / CIP 29.2 and you need access to FASTA data. AFAIK, no one here has access to FASTA data.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 12:29 PM | #53 |
Moderator
282
Rep 4,481
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 12:35 PM | #54 | |
Captain
21
Rep 703
Posts
Drives: '11 550i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
Quote:
I'm speculating (as are most of us), but I suspect that tuned vehicles with the 29.2 CIP update *on either / both the v80 & v81 DME* will begin to receive WARRANTY VOID notices from BMW NA 2-3 months following the next time they plug into the dealership diagnostic system. See FASTA data FASTA data is code stored in the ECU that is NOT visible at the dealership level. FASTA data is recorded / transferred to BMW NA (Europe?) whenever a diagnostic is run on the vehicle.
__________________
'11 550i | AT | Dark Graphite on Black
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 12:36 PM | #55 |
Brigadier General
551
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Raw data that gets collected by the DME on a wide range of variables. BMW uses this data to diagnose issues, particularly new issues or problematic issues. Dealers don't normally have access to this data. No one has been able to confirm if the detect code is part of the FASTA data.... The scary part is some of the tuners have declared that they are clean. We don't know this.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 12:42 PM | #56 | |
Moderator
282
Rep 4,481
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 12:45 PM | #57 |
Lieutenant Colonel
188
Rep 1,853
Posts |
And this is exactly why even if a tune works on the 81/29.2, it means nothing. Operational does not equal safe. Invisible equals safe, and how this can be determined, I have no idea. I'm hoping the experts will soon.
__________________
2008 335i
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 12:46 PM | #58 | |
Vishnu Powered
74
Rep 2,205
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2008 335xi Sedan | Titanium Silver | Black Dakota
PROcede v5 | Vishnu Exhaust | BMS DCI | AR Catless DPs | Helix FMIC | Stett Charge w/ Tial BOV | MORR VS8s | KWv3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 12:58 PM | #59 |
Brigadier General
551
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Upping the Ante
Not calling out any tuner in particular but if the tuners are confident that their solution is not detectable, ask your tuner if they are willing to make a respresent (a legal promise) that their solution is not detectible. To the tuners, if you make such a representation, and somebody buys your solution in part of because of this represenation, there will be legal consequences. Which of the tuners is willing to step up and make this representation? (I expect to hear crickets chirping)
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 01:02 PM | #60 | |
Vishnu Powered
74
Rep 2,205
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2008 335xi Sedan | Titanium Silver | Black Dakota
PROcede v5 | Vishnu Exhaust | BMS DCI | AR Catless DPs | Helix FMIC | Stett Charge w/ Tial BOV | MORR VS8s | KWv3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 01:02 PM | #61 | |
Moderator
282
Rep 4,481
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 01:05 PM | #62 | |
Brigadier General
551
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Quote:
My question is aimed squarely at whether tuners are willing to put money behind their words about detectibility..... At the dealer level or at the manufacturer's level.... In fact, I would expect all the tuners to expressly call out they CANNOT make any promises or representations that their solution is not detectible because of the liability of even implying they are not detectible.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 01:09 PM | #63 |
Lieutenant Colonel
188
Rep 1,853
Posts |
I thought Shiv had said he has access to the necessary tools, and Jeff from SSTT repeatedly refers to the FASTA checks/measures.
__________________
2008 335i
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 01:12 PM | #65 | |
Brigadier General
551
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Quote:
Again, see who steps up to the plate legally.... I will boldly predict the tuners will actually need to add a provision in their contract / agreement with their customers that they CANNOT guarantee undetectability. Once they do this, how is your confidence now?
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-12-2008, 01:14 PM | #66 |
Captain
21
Rep 703
Posts
Drives: '11 550i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Calgary, Canada
|
Sooner or later your car will be updated *if you keep it / service it*. PROGMAN / CIP updates take anywhere from a few minutes up to several hours to do, all depending on the amount of code being read / replaced.
__________________
'11 550i | AT | Dark Graphite on Black
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|