[Jeff@TopGearSolutions]

Originally Posted by Trojan4evr

I'm in the same boat, might go for a gt500 tho. just don't know what the insurance rates are for it for a 27 year old.

EVO/STI/M Models/AMG/High End mustang all are rated in the same tier (which is the highest).

<--- Ex insurance agent



(Interesting Note: My BMW Cost less then my Acura to insure, and a Corvette cost less then my BMW to insure)

Go figure!

[shockin330i]

Originally Posted by Jeff@topgearsolutions

EVO/STI/M Models/AMG/High End mustang all are rated in the same tier (which is the highest).

<--- Ex insurance agent



(Interesting Note: My BMW Cost less then my Acura to insure, and a Corvette cost less then my BMW to insure)

Go figure!

I guess its due to availability of parts...

[maui86]

Originally Posted by Jeff@topgearsolutions

EVO/STI/M Models/AMG/High End mustang all are rated in the same tier (which is the highest).

<--- Ex insurance agent



(Interesting Note: My BMW Cost less then my Acura to insure, and a Corvette cost less then my BMW to insure)

Go figure!

I didn't get that either, I was quoted less for a 2008 vette than my 335i. Haha

[NorthwestN54]

Originally Posted by CPWINCH

the mustang is ugly and heavy, i say a used gtr. twin turbo and has back seats

Not saying GTR-s aren't awesome, but how can you complain that a mustang is heavy in the same sentence as recommending a GT-R. They weigh almost 2 tons!

[E90SoFlo]

I would buy a Gt-r If I had 80 grand to spend. lol

[Infamous]

Originally Posted by Jeff@topgearsolutions

EVO/STI/M Models/AMG/High End mustang all are rated in the same tier (which is the highest).

<--- Ex insurance agent



(Interesting Note: My BMW Cost less then my Acura to insure, and a Corvette cost less then my BMW to insure)

Go figure!

Agreed!

I'm still in that industry (though not on the sales side) and the ratings systems are just plain fucking weird. And the degree of weirdness will also vary wildly from company to company and their various risk determination systems.