![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
My JB3 Test Drive
![]() |
![]() |
02-15-2009, 07:15 PM | #1 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
My JB3 Test Drive
Yea, finally threw it in again for a longer test drive. I had put it in weeks ago for a quick drive but nothing significant. Unfortunately couldn't perform any testing as I had a sick family to attend to. This was the 1.22 map Terry had sent me a while back. I should be able to test next weekend with a dyno session following shortly thereafter. I was running Map 6 in the JB3 and Stage 2 in the PROcede. For peak boost levels, I was seeing a little more with the JB3 as Map 6 may be closer to Stage 3 in the PROcede.
As for the install, it is PnP with the only difference being the lack of an additional power tap. It is compact and fits in nicely and a very elegant install. However, there were no screws to secure the DB25 to the JB3. I would worry that vibration could shake it loose and maybe my specimen was just lacking them. Everything fired up and ran just fine. I waiting for it to warm up and then proceeded to run it through some pedal ranges to get a feel. The first thing I noticed was the delay when pressing the throttle. Lag was more pronounced. But the second thing I noticed was the kick it had. It certainly had an impact when boost came up. I am not sure if it was the delay and the subsequent torque rise or some other effect but it seems to have a hard hitting feel. Compare this to the PROcede which seems to react immediately but builds slower and seems to continue building. This would also be evident when watching the boost gauge. The JB3 hit 12 PSI shortly after hitting the throttle. The PROcede went to 10 PSI and then climbed from there. Once power hit though the JB3 felt very nice. But I rarely drive at WOT and this is where I wanted to see the differences, normal driving. I don’t baby it but I rarely go high in the rev band, normally short shifting, and rarely giving it more than 75% throttle. And to be honest, I felt a little disconnected. There was a delay in the response when throttle was applied to where I felt I should apply more and then I got a great surge of power, which the JB3 is not short on; it definitely can make torque. But I found it more difficult to hit medium boost targets. I seemed to be at either 2 – 4 PSI or 11+ PSI. I was able to hit medium range but there was a small window of throttle travel where I could hit it. IMO, it felt more like driving an MBC turbo vehicle for those that know what I am referring to. In the next tests I will be doing datalogging which should eliminate the subjective analysis of the feel. An accelerometer and boost taps versus RPM cannot be argued. I am just curious if it will support what I am feeling. |
02-15-2009, 07:24 PM | #2 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
BTW, I got a Reduced Power message with the JB3. When I got home I hooked up the BT and found that it was related to the lack of O2 sims; the Rev II has the sim built in and I forgot. I need to install my old resistor based O2 sims into the JB3 harness. So no fault of the JB3 here, user error.
![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 07:25 PM | #3 |
Modder Raider
![]() 844
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Cool man.
Thanks a bunch for doing this. Are you only going to be checking Map 6 only or other maps as well? Maybe if Map 6 is more like stage 3 then maybe you should test out the others as well. Just a thought.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM ![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 07:27 PM | #4 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
I will be. But in this test, since I wasn't changing maps on the PROcede, I left the JB3 alone as well.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 07:29 PM | #5 |
Chairman of the Board.
16
Rep 452
Posts |
Sorry for being a noob here, scalbert, but were you able to "reset" or "clear" the fault code you received from running the JB3? Were you also able to check what other parameters were off with the BT?
Thanks! |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 07:30 PM | #6 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
Quote:
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 07:36 PM | #7 |
Major
![]() ![]() 258
Rep 1,297
Posts |
Good writeup!
Actually, one of my favorite things about the JB3 is the the low end extra boost. It is not as "lag free" as the Procede but the extra boost makes it very drivable! This is also very true in 6th gear at 65MPH... |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:07 PM | #9 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
Quote:
![]() But I would have preferred a little more control with the throttle. It seemed to be more of a digital control than analog, some will understand it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:09 PM | #10 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
Quote:
This is why I am hoping for the return of the RPM specific UT values in the PROcede. So I can tailor my torque curve. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:17 PM | #11 |
Second Lieutenant
![]() ![]() 3
Rep 279
Posts |
This may be a noob question, but is it the case that you will throw a code with Map 6 without the proper mods or o2 sims, as you did? But this wouldn't be an issue with Map 3/4?
__________________
Current:
2007 Subaru WRX STi 2007 Triumph Speed Triple ![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:19 PM | #12 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
The lack of the O2 sim would have been an issue had the JB3 not been installed at all. It was completely independant.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:20 PM | #13 |
Chairman of the Board.
16
Rep 452
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:21 PM | #14 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:23 PM | #15 | |
Slow Mo
15
Rep 534
Posts |
Quote:
PS. You are missing the screws to your DB25 connector. Mine has them. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:25 PM | #18 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:37 PM | #19 |
Second Lieutenant
![]() ![]() 3
Rep 279
Posts |
lol, I read the thread. What I was getting at is if an o2 sim is required at all. My understanding is that the PROcede has a soft o2 sim and the JB3 does not. I guess I'm trying to get a better grasp of what's required if I ever decide to go either route.
__________________
Current:
2007 Subaru WRX STi 2007 Triumph Speed Triple ![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:37 PM | #20 | |
Second Lieutenant
![]() ![]() 3
Rep 279
Posts |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Current:
2007 Subaru WRX STi 2007 Triumph Speed Triple ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 08:41 PM | #21 |
Major General
![]() ![]() 161
Rep 5,776
Posts |
Gotcha. It is only the PROcede Rev II that has the soft O2 sim.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-15-2009, 09:33 PM | #22 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 68
Rep 1,914
Posts |
great review, exactly how i feel with the differences between the two tunes. im a jb3 owner, very happy with it but am asking for more immediate/low end torq and response. we'll c, i think it will be on the 1/3 chip ..hopefully.
btw, did you change the map to map6 after install? the defult map on the 1.22 outta box is map 3, just thought i had point it out. map 3 low end is very much like stock, map 6 has more immediate torq. |
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|