|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Which race dyno has impressed you the most?
|
|
View Poll Results: Which race dyno do you find most impressive? | |||
GIAC | 21 | 56.76% | |
JB3 | 9 | 24.32% | |
PROCEDE | 7 | 18.92% | |
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-19-2009, 03:35 PM | #1 |
Enlisted Member
3
Rep 31
Posts |
Which race dyno has impressed you the most?
I have been following the recent racing tuning developments and selected dynos that I think represents the best of what I've seen from each. I am wondering which dyno/tuning the forum finds the most impressive. Other modifications on all of the cars are similar. The differences are the tuning and fueling. The question is which race dyno is most impressive given its fueling. Which one would you prefer on a race track.
I also ask in advance no vendors or biased people running one of these tunes to participate to keep this thread on track. |
11-19-2009, 07:01 PM | #3 | |
First Lieutenant
28
Rep 372
Posts |
Quote:
Oh and, thank you! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2009, 07:12 PM | #4 | |
Banned
198
Rep 5,046
Posts |
Quote:
Keep up the good work! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2009, 07:16 PM | #5 |
Team Zissou
138
Rep 1,426
Posts |
GIAC FTW. I couldn't be happier with my setup, and every customer's car we've flashed has been extremely happy as well!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2009, 08:34 PM | #8 |
Captain
38
Rep 763
Posts |
i feel like if you were to average all the power made from all the jb3 drivers vs proceed drivers vs GIAC drivers, the jb3 on average makes more power than the other tunes and that is what is important not the freak exceptions but the consistant numbers, please correct me if im wrong
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2009, 09:41 PM | #9 | |
Banned
198
Rep 5,046
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2009, 10:03 PM | #10 |
Brigadier General
136
Rep 4,764
Posts |
Impressed with all of them. Still not convinced to leave the piggy back world. Too happy with loading up maps in a minute and being able to remove the whole thing in 20. Nearest place to flash is 40 minutes away.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-19-2009, 10:09 PM | #11 |
Brigadier General
137
Rep 3,132
Posts |
Most impressed by JB3s numbers
Most impressed by GIACs numbers coming out of nowhere (well, not really nowhere, but nowhere as far as n54 is concerned). But still attached to my V3. It's always a hair behind in power, but it always has something else going for it. (see pnp meth). GIAC, do you have any plans for a flash that intentionally has less torque than that? For tranny/traction related concerns of course.
__________________
2018 R35 GT-R Cicio800 | 2007 E92 335i - RB Turbos, TC Kline DA Coils, HPA M3 Suspension, Quaife LSD, Stoptech BBK, JB4, FuelIT, AR Downpipes, RDSport Quads, Stett OC, Helix IC, Volk TE-37, Vorsteiner V-35, OSS Headlights | Retired - 2015 F82 M4
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2009, 05:56 AM | #12 |
Major General
315
Rep 5,175
Posts |
Guys take this for what you will, but tuner numbers are not the most accurate. Actually I would go as far as saying they are worthless. Some of the tuners are very transparent, while others are obviously not. Now let me explain my statement... dynos can be can be calibrated to read whatever you want. Trust me, I have seen it done first hand for marketing reasons. Now, if there are legit baselines posted then you know what you are getting. For example, Terry produced a delta (increase) of 180 rwhp on the dyno you posted. Since we know the delta, we can compare it with other dyno numbers. This "dyno" glory stuff is becoming a joke.
We saw in other threads where the shop cars were producing the same dyno numbers as other tunes, yet when CUSTOMERS put the cars head to head one got destroyed. I am not saying to judge anyone yet, but lets see real world customer results with baselines before we decide to pass judgement on the winner. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2009, 08:23 AM | #13 | |
Second Lieutenant
37
Rep 220
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2009, 08:45 AM | #14 |
Major General
315
Rep 5,175
Posts |
This is where the baseline is tremendously useful. When you have a baseline and can compare deltas, then you have real data that is useful.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2009, 10:39 AM | #15 |
302
Rep 4,408
Posts |
Heh, Ive seen 50-70whp variations........ Before anyone lynches me, I am NOT saying ANYTHING about GIACs #s... just a generic comment on how much our local dynos SUCK....
__________________
-Critter
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2009, 11:36 AM | #16 |
Team Zissou
3154
Rep 10,200
Posts |
Yeah, there can be huge huge differences.. comparing numbers you at least need the baseline from each.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2009, 09:04 PM | #17 | |
Team Zissou
138
Rep 1,426
Posts |
Quote:
I don't want to steal their thunder, so I'll let GIAC post up the info on this one when theyre ready, but my mind is blown over the results compared to the history of runs on the MD Auto Dynojet. Have a good weekend guys! Nick
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-20-2009, 09:12 PM | #18 | |
General
8684
Rep 19,103
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Quote:
__________________
Tom G. | european auto source (eas)
email: tom@europeanautosource.com · web: https://europeanautosource.com· tel 866.669.0705 · ca: 714.369.8524 x22 GET DAILY UPDATES ON OUR BLOG · FACEBOOK · YOUTUBE · FLICKR · INSTAGRAM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|