|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
PROcede V1.47, Spearco FMIC and catted downpipes
|
|
09-16-2007, 01:12 PM | #1 |
Moderator
281
Rep 4,481
Posts |
PROcede V1.47, Spearco FMIC and catted downpipes
Hi,
Is there a risk to use this combination with the PROcede V1.47 standard or LBT map ? In my understanding the most important thing in FI applications ( beside avoiding detonations ) are proper AFR settings. Any feedback appreciated. Thanks - Eugen |
09-16-2007, 01:27 PM | #3 |
Moderator
281
Rep 4,481
Posts |
Using top brand and high octane gas and avoiding high IAT's. The stock intake and FMIC do a good job already, the Spearco FMIC will do a better one. I am using the PROcede V1.47LBT map since quite a while. Beside I would like to have more power I consider this as a safe tune. I have zero problems.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2007, 02:11 PM | #4 | |
Brigadier General
1581
Rep 3,888
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2007, 02:37 PM | #5 |
Banned
14
Rep 1,137
Posts |
Afr ratios must be ok. And definitive way is to listen for the knock at dyno hood open and head deep down in your engine bay. Extremist puts a microphone close to the engine and wires the speaker next to the AFR meter that has alarm for lean figures. As far as you don't hear the knock you are fine.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2007, 02:42 PM | #6 |
Banned
14
Rep 1,137
Posts |
Eugen, get it dynoed and asks the dyno guys opinion or study the AFR stuff. Dyno at cool fall weather when oxygen density is high. You should be safe. (If not, buy JB2 )
ps see that they listen for the knock. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2007, 02:47 PM | #7 | |
Brigadier General
1581
Rep 3,888
Posts |
Quote:
The conditions tend to be very different from a dyno to actual highway driving - for example, varying ambient temperatures - is the tuner going to dyno a hot car? Also, on the road there is varying load due to things like hills and fat passengers. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2007, 02:49 PM | #8 |
Moderator
281
Rep 4,481
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2007, 02:52 PM | #9 |
Banned
14
Rep 1,137
Posts |
Zenmaster you are right, the word definitive should have been a bit later i.e. If you never hear the knock. You can be quite sure about it though if you log AFRs in the worst conditions and they are on the rich side.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2007, 03:10 PM | #10 |
Brigadier General
1581
Rep 3,888
Posts |
Well that may be oversimplifying things, as the key would be to understand and to reproduce "worst conditions". Such conditions would depend on the operating requirements of this unique engine. Presumably, you don't want to have to run rich under any conditions - that is, to provide a "safe" tune. From what I gather, this direct injection has very precise control over fuel delivery. So if this same control is offered to a piggyback, it may actually be possible to always provide close to ideal AFR.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2007, 03:20 PM | #11 | |
Moderator
281
Rep 4,481
Posts |
Quote:
V2 will offer more control and more flexibility. The concern has been my OP. Thanks, - Eugen |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-16-2007, 03:55 PM | #12 | |
Brigadier General
1581
Rep 3,888
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|