![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
My Dyno results
![]() |
![]() |
03-30-2014, 06:56 AM | #25 |
Brigadier General
![]() ![]() 236
Rep 3,488
Posts
Drives: Montego Blue 335d
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Puerto Rico(Dominican Republic 03/2017)
|
Dixy the set of wires are BROWN and they have a SILVER tag on them you can clamp on the the torque reader ok on any of the BROWN wires
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2014, 07:20 AM | #27 |
Colonel
![]() 627
Rep 2,408
Posts |
This place has a huge database of different cars and also has the advantage of not having the tire/wheel loss involved in the equation. Lots of statistical data on the measured power/torque delivered to the axles vs manufacturer claimed numbers. They have great explanations of the different types of losses involved (constant, speed and load losses). They describe why using a fixed loss or trying to measure loss with a rolling road type dyno will not be accurate. It was an interesting read.
http://rototest-research.eu/index.ph...&Menu=38&ID=11 The 335d results are located here: http://rototest-research.eu/popup/pe...p?ChartsID=688 Compare to an M3 with manual transmission http://rototest-research.eu/popup/pe...p?ChartsID=768 The diesel with automatic actually measured lower losses (closer to stated power/torque) than the manual transmission M3. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2014, 11:55 AM | #30 |
Colonel
![]() 213
Rep 2,210
Posts |
Those are based on manufacturer stated numbers though which are pretty often not correct, BMW certainly enjoys underrating their engines. The only way to really get it figured out in my opinion would be to run one on an engine dyno and then run it on the same dyno connected through the trans. Otherwise you're introducing a whole bunch of variable not the least of which is that dyno results are often just plain wrong.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2014, 12:26 PM | #31 | |
Warrant Officer
![]() 381
Rep 1,340
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Deleted, ATM I/C and tuned by B.R.R.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2014, 01:34 PM | #32 |
Colonel
![]() 213
Rep 2,210
Posts |
I agree, and I figure that's why you don't really ever see the values. You might be able to find some for widely used transmissions in the aftermarket like a th350, th400, t56, a700, etc. but nobody is going to take the time and expense to do it for ours. In the end it doesn't really matter for us, what you make at the flywheel doesn't mean anything unless you plan to swap it into a plane and bolt a propeller to it. Wheel power numbers are more useful.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2014, 01:45 PM | #33 | |
Colonel
![]() 627
Rep 2,408
Posts |
Quote:
They have a plot of the % variation from claimed to measured across >400 separate auto's and bunches of manufacturers. Average % "loss" from claimed performance was ~10%. But this didn't have the tires involved which add more loss (that's why the tires get hot when they're rolling ... they dissipate power). I find the whole drivetrain % loss on dyno's to get back to crank a little like Black Magic. Why do we care about anything other than what gets put to the ground? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2014, 05:42 PM | #34 |
Colonel
![]() 213
Rep 2,210
Posts |
Haha, yep absolutely. A lot of the European dyno charts show a 25% value for figured drivetrain loss and then everyone wonders why the cars compared to similar US dyno numbers don't seem to perform. Might as well not dyno and just through darts to decide what your figures are. WHP and WTQ are king in the real world, nobody should care what theoretically is put to the flywheel.
|
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|