|
|
|
|
PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Need recommendations on Negative Camber
|
|
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-23-2013, 06:35 PM | #1 |
Quiet till poked
104
Rep 1,176
Posts |
Need recommendations on Negative Camber
Hi guys, I have lowered my car on kw v1s and would like to reduce my negative camber. My car is my DD and I'd like to get some recommendations for the amount of camber I should have. I'd also like to know what the stock setting BMW sets the camber at.
I have a staggered setup with 235/35/29 and 275/30/29. Thanks guys. Last edited by kisho; 07-23-2014 at 09:57 AM.. |
12-23-2013, 08:09 PM | #2 |
Colonel
237
Rep 2,643
Posts |
For rear wheel drive models with sport suspension, the stock rear camber is typically around 1.6 to 1.8 degrees.
When I asked for the rear camber to be set minimum, it came out around 1.1 ~ 1.2 degrees. The tire wear has been quite even with that setting. IMO, around 1.3 to 1.5 degrees should be pretty fine as a general recommendation. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2013, 12:38 PM | #3 | |
Quiet till poked
104
Rep 1,176
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-24-2013, 02:42 PM | #4 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
2080
Rep 25,980
Posts |
If you're concerned with tire wear, pay more attention to your toe settings, rather than just the camber. You'll find many threads in the wheel and tire section about premature wear, and most people blame camber, but the true culprit is their toe.
__________________
VMR|Wheels | 714.442.7916 |
sales@velocitymotoring.com | www.velocitymotoring.com | facebook | flickr | Instagram |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2014, 09:55 AM | #5 | |
Quiet till poked
104
Rep 1,176
Posts |
Quote:
Also, can someone give me some recommended numbers for toe and camber for a lowered xi. I'm looking for relatively even tire wear, but don't want to sacrifice too much performance. Thanks. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2014, 10:34 AM | #6 |
Mr. Monaco
158
Rep 4,197
Posts |
toe should be zero or close to it, unless you need to adjust for fitment clearance. Are you lowered all the way down on v1? Camber in rear shuouldnt be much of an issue, and if you need negative I cant imagine anything more than 2 degrees or so
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2014, 10:49 AM | #7 | |
Brigadier General
1304
Rep 4,180
Posts |
Quote:
Case in point - I'm running -2.7 degrees in front and -1.5 degrees in rear with zero/slightly negative toe. No abnormal wear at all. Last edited by ashmostro; 07-23-2014 at 09:28 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2014, 01:11 PM | #8 | |
Quiet till poked
104
Rep 1,176
Posts |
This is what I have as of now.
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2014, 01:46 PM | #10 |
Colonel
692
Rep 2,770
Posts |
For the front camber it looks like you may have some damage or tweaking of the frame. camber should not increase much (if at all) on these cars when you lower them (unlike a double wishbone design in Japanese cars). You should do some searching about the front alignment pin. There is a pin in the front strut hats that locks it to the chassis. The bolt holes for the hats are slotted. You can pull this pin and adjust camber that way.
Like VMR said though, toe has much more to do with tire wear. I actually set my front camber to the max negative I could get with the pins pulled (about 1 degree) and had the shop set the front to zero toe. I have seen no adverse tire wear from them and it improves the handling and turn-in of the car greatly. The rear camber is fully adjustable and again, will not change significantly with being lowered.
__________________
2008 Honda S2000 - Current
2016 F80 M3 - SOLD!! 2011 e92 X-Drive Coupe - SOLD!! |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2014, 09:26 PM | #11 | |
Quiet till poked
104
Rep 1,176
Posts |
Quote:
Is your car a DD? What's the max you got your front camber to? I'm thinking -1.4 would be good for me with 0.0 to -.04 toe on each side. For the rear, -1.8 camber on each side and 0.08 toe. However, I am seeing a lot of ppl with more camber in front than in the rear. What's the difference? I honestly don't know what I really want but based on the research I did, the numbers themselves seem relatively conservative. BTW, the car is a DD and a mainly a highway warrior but I live out in the woods with lots of twisties. So I run through the twisties every morning and night. So as much as I want straight line stability, I don't want to sacrifice my fun going to/from home. Basically just looking for that decent compromise. Last edited by kisho; 07-23-2014 at 10:17 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2014, 12:09 AM | #12 | |
Colonel
692
Rep 2,770
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2008 Honda S2000 - Current
2016 F80 M3 - SOLD!! 2011 e92 X-Drive Coupe - SOLD!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-24-2014, 01:12 PM | #13 | |
Quiet till poked
104
Rep 1,176
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|