![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
What would make more power... This Vs That
![]() |
![]() |
02-20-2015, 07:16 PM | #1 |
N54 E92
57
Rep 342
Posts |
What would make more power... This Vs That
What I have:
VRSF CP / TiAL / Gutted DPs / DCI / TCU Flash / PE Mod Vishnu Procede 2.5 / Custom Procede Maps Vishnu PWM Methanol Kit Older Wedge DME Flash that I did with my BT Cable What I'm thinking about: VRSF CP / TiAL / Gutted DPs / DCI / TCU Flash / PE Mod Intercooler (VRSF $500) E85 Fuel-It Stage 2 Pump ($405) Cheapest Cobb ? / BQ Tuning (Any ideas on $ ?) What do you guys think?
__________________
![]() Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
02-20-2015, 07:19 PM | #2 |
![]() 3482
Rep 79,210
Posts
Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com
|
So the difference is a PRocede with meth no FMIC VS Cobb with FMIC on E85?
That would be pretty darn close. I'd put my money on the meth kit assuming it's tuned for max power but on paper they are probably pretty close on power. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2015, 08:00 PM | #5 | |
![]() 3482
Rep 79,210
Posts
Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com
|
Quote:
![]() Octane plus IAT supression is pretty hard to beat on methanol. I've put a lot of FBO E85 guys to shame running Intake tune Meth, no FMIC, just saying... ![]() Although E85 helps bump up octane it doesn't help the IAT suppression and even the best intercooler won't suppress IAT like methanol can. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2015, 08:08 PM | #6 | |
![]() 2126
Rep 43,349
Posts |
Quote:
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2015, 08:13 PM | #7 |
![]() 3482
Rep 79,210
Posts
Drives: C6 Z06, 09 335i, 10 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: www.TopGearSolutions.com
|
I may be a little biased about methanol cars but yea it would be really close for sure. In a real world race I'd want to know if they are AT or MT and how heavy the drivers are as the race might be that close. I still always bias for anyone on methanol though cause it's hard to beat the IAT suppression.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2015, 08:47 PM | #8 | |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
![]() ![]() 5100
Rep 116,225
Posts |
Quote:
My money would be on the meth car Mike |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2015, 09:32 PM | #9 |
N54 E92
57
Rep 342
Posts |
Sounds like I should keep current setup!
New Question and this one would be for WedgePerformance and BuraQ Would it be possible to assign the PROcede I have as only a methanol controller, as well as flash a tune using my BT Cable through the B.B. Software - As I did my original Wedge Flash. That way the only thing I would need would be a BQ Tune through you and a Fuel-It Stage 2 Pump - Saving me the cost of a $800+ Cobb I'd imagine I could even go with 100% E85 at that point versus a blend (not for increase performance - but for ease of use).
__________________
![]() Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2015, 10:52 PM | #10 | |
Brigadier General
![]() 269
Rep 4,936
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2015, 12:03 AM | #12 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
![]() 1354
Rep 1,701
Posts
Drives: Slot Machines.. Keep Taking $
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Portland, OR
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2015, 12:15 AM | #13 | |
Colonel
![]() 356
Rep 2,049
Posts |
Quote:
i would do e85 less hassle |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2015, 12:50 AM | #14 |
Second Lieutenant
![]() 33
Rep 269
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2015, 02:46 PM | #15 | |
N54 E92
57
Rep 342
Posts |
Quote:
Judging by your signature, MHD Flasher?
__________________
![]() Light Bolt-ons, Tunes, & Methanol Injection: 12.30 @ 115mph [2.0 60ft on Street Tires] [91 Octane] 1.59 Seconds Faster than Stock [as of 05/29/2014] Previous Vehicle: '65 Chevelle [LSx 6.0L/4L80e] |
|
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|