E90Post
 


Extreme Powerhouse
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > CXRacing Intercooler



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-11-2015, 11:34 AM   #23
terryd5150
Head Fry Cook at McBurgertown
United_States
503
Rep
1,005
Posts

Drives: 2015 435i M-Sport 6MT
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Greenville, SC

iTrader: (9)

Quote:
Originally Posted by csu87 View Post
I believe the original was for a turbo xs intercooler, 24x10x3.5, and a stock genesis coupe turbo, ~380cfm @ 20 psi. Pretty big intercooler for a smaller turbo system, but once you put on a bigger turbo, it performed well.

It was a while ago so I'm not 100% sure, but for the few years i was apart of that scene, threads like this popped up almost monthly. Yes a cx racing intercooler will give you some decent results, but that is because almost anything is better than a stock intercooler. But for best results, a well designed intercooler with good fin density will work better.

For this platform, i don't think anyone has done any testing as to how much better exactly and if it's worth it. Maybe something I will test in the future.
That context makes a little more sense; I was suspecting an off-boost condition (like idle).

I think it's an excellent example proving that the intercooler needs to be matched to the air flow/turbo size of the application - more is obviously not better (once you've exceeded the system's capacity to generate air flow).

Fin density will help overcome some aspects of IC inefficiency (like length); I'm not sure how well it can compensate for depth. As lcvette mentioned, depth only provides air flow, it's a less efficient design when it comes to cooling.

Here's a quick, easy read that sums lcvette's statements into layman's terms for those without a technical degree:

http://www.superstreetonline.com/how...p-intercooler/

Cheers for the solid technical discussion!
Appreciate 1
      07-11-2015, 12:22 PM   #24
Chris@BoostConcepts
Chris@BoostConcepts's Avatar
United_States
172
Rep
312
Posts

Drives: 2008 BMW 135i, 2007 335i e92
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wilmington, NC

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by csu87 View Post
I believe the original was for a turbo xs intercooler, 24x10x3.5, and a stock genesis coupe turbo, ~380cfm @ 20 psi. Pretty big intercooler for a smaller turbo system, but once you put on a bigger turbo, it performed well.

It was a while ago so I'm not 100% sure, but for the few years i was apart of that scene, threads like this popped up almost monthly. Yes a cx racing intercooler will give you some decent results, but that is because almost anything is better than a stock intercooler. But for best results, a well designed intercooler with good fin density will work better.

For this platform, i don't think anyone has done any testing as to how much better exactly and if it's worth it. Maybe something I will test in the future.
That is correct, when you increase the fin density you effectively increase surface area. My point is that you can increase surface area with higher fin density which increases heat transfer, but if your frontal area is small you limit cooling airflow. And with limited airflow and a deep core the available cooling air is decreased so significantly that the saturation point of the core is compromised. The saturation point starts earlier near the back of the core because the cooling airflow has already absorbed heat from the front of the core. As the temperature Delta narrows between the cooling airflow and high density external fins, the heat transfer efficiency plummets.

So in essence you must choose the lesser of two evils because to my knowledge there is not a best option currently. On one hand you have more uniform heat transfer from the cooking air but lower heat transfer from the charge air due to lower fin density, on the other you have the opposite.

The win goes to the CXRacing Intercooler because it offsets its low fin density with increased cooling airflow and more uniform surface area exposure to ambient airflow. This increases the efficiency by creating a much higher average Delta between total core surface area temperature and cooling airflow mass temperature.

So again, Tall and thin with high fin density is the most efficient core, and end tank design to maximize uniform airflow for Increased efficiency.

I have some 18x12x3" cores in stock, I also have a 18x12x4 in stock.. For the sake of this thread I will design and fabricate a prototype intercooler with the best of the best fin density and core size and shape along with custom fabricated end tanks. And I will run simulations on it and share the results along with the analysis criteria for review. Will take me a while as I have a full plate currently but I had planned on doing this anyhow to build my own intercooler for max efficiency.

Chris
Appreciate 4
      07-11-2015, 01:21 PM   #25
marketmaster
First Lieutenant
37
Rep
311
Posts

Drives: 2007 BMW 335
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: United States-TX

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lcvette View Post
That is correct, when you increase the fin density you effectively increase surface area. My point is that you can increase surface area with higher fin density which increases heat transfer, but if your frontal area is small you limit cooling airflow. And with limited airflow and a deep core the available cooling air is decreased so significantly that the saturation point of the core is compromised. The saturation point starts earlier near the back of the core because the cooling airflow has already absorbed heat from the front of the core. As the temperature Delta narrows between the cooling airflow and high density external fins, the heat transfer efficiency plummets.

So in essence you must choose the lesser of two evils because to my knowledge there is not a best option currently. On one hand you have more uniform heat transfer from the cooking air but lower heat transfer from the charge air due to lower fin density, on the other you have the opposite.

The win goes to the CXRacing Intercooler because it offsets its low fin density with increased cooling airflow and more uniform surface area exposure to ambient airflow. This increases the efficiency by creating a much higher average Delta between total core surface area temperature and cooling airflow mass temperature.

So again, Tall and thin with high fin density is the most efficient core, and end tank design to maximize uniform airflow for Increased efficiency.

I have some 18x12x3" cores in stock, I also have a 18x12x4 in stock.. For the sake of this thread I will design and fabricate a prototype intercooler with the best of the best fin density and core size and shape along with custom fabricated end tanks. And I will run simulations on it and share the results along with the analysis criteria for review. Will take me a while as I have a full plate currently but I had planned on doing this anyhow to build my own intercooler for max efficiency.

Chris
Chris,
Your plate is like a buffet. it just keeps getting loaded and loaded . Would love to see an intercooler from you and also that DIY for the fuel pump
Appreciate 1
      07-11-2015, 01:35 PM   #26
terryd5150
Head Fry Cook at McBurgertown
United_States
503
Rep
1,005
Posts

Drives: 2015 435i M-Sport 6MT
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Greenville, SC

iTrader: (9)

Fuel pump DIY?

As in Walbro 450?
Appreciate 1
      07-11-2015, 01:42 PM   #27
e92_boost
Captain
e92_boost's Avatar
228
Rep
703
Posts

Drives: Smart Car
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kenosha Wi

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lcvette
Quote:
Originally Posted by csu87 View Post
I believe the original was for a turbo xs intercooler, 24x10x3.5, and a stock genesis coupe turbo, ~380cfm @ 20 psi. Pretty big intercooler for a smaller turbo system, but once you put on a bigger turbo, it performed well.

It was a while ago so I'm not 100% sure, but for the few years i was apart of that scene, threads like this popped up almost monthly. Yes a cx racing intercooler will give you some decent results, but that is because almost anything is better than a stock intercooler. But for best results, a well designed intercooler with good fin density will work better.

For this platform, i don't think anyone has done any testing as to how much better exactly and if it's worth it. Maybe something I will test in the future.
That is correct, when you increase the fin density you effectively increase surface area. My point is that you can increase surface area with higher fin density which increases heat transfer, but if your frontal area is small you limit cooling airflow. And with limited airflow and a deep core the available cooling air is decreased so significantly that the saturation point of the core is compromised. The saturation point starts earlier near the back of the core because the cooling airflow has already absorbed heat from the front of the core. As the temperature Delta narrows between the cooling airflow and high density external fins, the heat transfer efficiency plummets.

So in essence you must choose the lesser of two evils because to my knowledge there is not a best option currently. On one hand you have more uniform heat transfer from the cooking air but lower heat transfer from the charge air due to lower fin density, on the other you have the opposite.

The win goes to the CXRacing Intercooler because it offsets its low fin density with increased cooling airflow and more uniform surface area exposure to ambient airflow. This increases the efficiency by creating a much higher average Delta between total core surface area temperature and cooling airflow mass temperature.

So again, Tall and thin with high fin density is the most efficient core, and end tank design to maximize uniform airflow for Increased efficiency.

I have some 18x12x3" cores in stock, I also have a 18x12x4 in stock.. For the sake of this thread I will design and fabricate a prototype intercooler with the best of the best fin density and core size and shape along with custom fabricated end tanks. And I will run simulations on it and share the results along with the analysis criteria for review. Will take me a while as I have a full plate currently but I had planned on doing this anyhow to build my own intercooler for max efficiency.

Chris
That would be awesome would you recommend the 3.5 or the 4' V-Mount IC because I'll be ordering one soon and do this at my cousins shop when I get back cause I'll be going RB from there a single turbo when I get bored with the RB and Port injection lol.

And yes it would be awesome if someone does a DIY on the LPFP instead of paying 400 bucks for something that costs less then 100 bucks lol. (I already have the stage 2 but I wouldn't mind upgrading to the stage 3)
__________________
ESS G1 e90
- BBS E88
Appreciate 1
      07-11-2015, 02:35 PM   #28
Chris@BoostConcepts
Chris@BoostConcepts's Avatar
United_States
172
Rep
312
Posts

Drives: 2008 BMW 135i, 2007 335i e92
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wilmington, NC

iTrader: (2)

Well, let me see what I come up with once I complete the models and I will list hard data to support your decision making process. Or possibly a new design completely that is just better all together then what's on the current market.

As for the fuel pump.... I will be reporting on that soon. It has morphed from a DIY to something more but I am not comfortable going into any detail beyond that at this time.
Appreciate 1
      07-11-2015, 02:43 PM   #29
e92_boost
Captain
e92_boost's Avatar
228
Rep
703
Posts

Drives: Smart Car
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kenosha Wi

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lcvette
Well, let me see what I come up with once I complete the models and I will list hard data to support your decision making process. Or possibly a new design completely that is just better all together then what's on the current market.

As for the fuel pump.... I will be reporting on that soon. It has morphed from a DIY to something more but I am not comfortable going into any detail beyond that at this time.
Sweet, thank you! Will the info for the IC be ready by September?
__________________
ESS G1 e90
- BBS E88
Appreciate 1
      07-11-2015, 02:45 PM   #30
Chris@BoostConcepts
Chris@BoostConcepts's Avatar
United_States
172
Rep
312
Posts

Drives: 2008 BMW 135i, 2007 335i e92
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Wilmington, NC

iTrader: (2)

I would hope so, was thinking more like this coming week
Appreciate 1
      07-11-2015, 03:35 PM   #31
e92_boost
Captain
e92_boost's Avatar
228
Rep
703
Posts

Drives: Smart Car
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kenosha Wi

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lcvette
I would hope so, was thinking more like this coming week
Thanks so much
__________________
ESS G1 e90
- BBS E88
Appreciate 1
      07-21-2015, 08:08 AM   #32
jtswole
First Lieutenant
42
Rep
380
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: FL

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by amr_e90 View Post
If you don't mind molesting your fan shroud and finding couplers that work then cx is good I have it and it all cost me around 200/215 all set and done , if you want a direct replacement any of the good name brands are fine .
Can you post the extra pieces you had to buy? Which couplers you needed to install?
Appreciate 0
      07-21-2015, 08:15 PM   #33
Deejayabap
Registered
2
Rep
4
Posts

Drives: E92 335i (N54
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Philly/NJ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtswole
Quote:
Originally Posted by amr_e90 View Post
If you don't mind molesting your fan shroud and finding couplers that work then cx is good I have it and it all cost me around 200/215 all set and done , if you want a direct replacement any of the good name brands are fine .
Can you post the extra pieces you had to buy? Which couplers you needed to install?
Just did my CX last weekend just need to shave plastic everywhere to make it fit flush lol
Attached Images
  
Appreciate 0
      07-21-2015, 08:19 PM   #34
Deejayabap
Registered
2
Rep
4
Posts

Drives: E92 335i (N54
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Philly/NJ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtswole
Quote:
Originally Posted by amr_e90 View Post
If you don't mind molesting your fan shroud and finding couplers that work then cx is good I have it and it all cost me around 200/215 all set and done , if you want a direct replacement any of the good name brands are fine .
Can you post the extra pieces you had to buy? Which couplers you needed to install?
Bought 2.5-3.0 inch couplings unfortunately the stock pipes don't reach with the intercooler in place I'm buying piping Thursday tho and I'll post up what I have
Attached Images
  
Appreciate 1
      07-22-2015, 05:07 PM   #35
abhishriv
Major
101
Rep
1,384
Posts

Drives: 2007 335i Coupe (Space grey)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

the CX is nice. i have one installed on my car but make sure either you or your mechanic is able to fabricate a bracket for it. also a lot of trimming required for the shroud. but in the end it look aggressive as hell and i find it keeps my IAT lower.

if you want a quick install get one of the other vendor proven FMIC, you cant go wrong with those either. a lot of people on here will bicker about one FMIC being better than the other but for most cars on here that are daily driven and tuned any of them will be fine! Just pick one that fits your needs and budget and go for it.
Appreciate 0
      07-22-2015, 06:42 PM   #36
e92_boost
Captain
e92_boost's Avatar
228
Rep
703
Posts

Drives: Smart Car
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kenosha Wi

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by abhishriv
the CX is nice. i have one installed on my car but make sure either you or your mechanic is able to fabricate a bracket for it. also a lot of trimming required for the shroud. but in the end it look aggressive as hell and i find it keeps my IAT lower.

if you want a quick install get one of the other vendor proven FMIC, you cant go wrong with those either. a lot of people on here will bicker about one FMIC being better than the other but for most cars on here that are daily driven and tuned any of them will be fine! Just pick one that fits your needs and budget and go for it.
I just went and ordered the 7" VRSF when I upgrade my Turbos I'll be doing the CXR Intercooler
__________________
ESS G1 e90
- BBS E88
Appreciate 1
      07-22-2015, 10:13 PM   #37
HeavyMetalRocker
Captain
HeavyMetalRocker's Avatar
United_States
39
Rep
632
Posts

Drives: 2007 BMW 335i E90 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Dallas, Texas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by e92_boost View Post
Hey guys, looking to upgrade intercoolers, I want to order the CXRacing Intercooler it's the whole set up for 499. By the time I get back from vacation I'll be upgrading turbos + inlets also so would this benefit me more or should I just get the VRSF 7' Intercooler.

Anyone with personal experience on the CXRacing? The posts I've read people love it weather it was a 3 series or 1 series.
What everyone else is saying aside, I have a CxRacing FMIC. I did all of the cold and hot side piping myself. I ordered everything from the CxRacing website to avoid any possible ebay scams. I got universal piping that I cut and used the appropriate couplers to connect everything. All in all, it was probably the hardest thing I've done on my car downpipes and turbos included. It requires some major modifications and some thin arms to do some handy work! Now, the thing freaking performs! I'm in Texas, multiple post run IATs in the low 120's when I was running upgraded RBs @20psi with an e85 blend no meth. That was just a few weeks ago when temps were well into the 90s. Anyone can trash talk the quality, the fin design, the spacing, or whatever else... the thing does the job, and it does it well! I'm getting the Motiv 750 kit here in a few weeks so it will be interesting to see if things change. They advertise a 5psi drop at 35psi so that's not too great but I'll cross that bridge when I get there. I haven't been able to find too much pressure drop data on other brands so I may custom order a Spearco FMIC and see where that gets me! I'm all about the frontal surface area, not depth!
__________________
2007 335i e90 6mt | Motiv 750 XR8267 | RB PCV | JB4 G5 | MHD Pump Flash | Walbro 255lph | VRSF CP & Tial BOV | NGK Plugs | Custom Side Exhaust | CxRacing FMIC | Spec 2+ & SSMFW | StopTech Drilled/Slotted Rotors | Hawk Performance Pads | DEFIV Lockdown kit | Mtec V3 | Apex PS7s | 35/15% Llumar ceramic
Appreciate 0
      07-22-2015, 11:45 PM   #38
Tiago@VRSF
Tiago@VRSF's Avatar
United_States
2108
Rep
43,350
Posts

Drives: F90 M5
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Doral, FL

iTrader: (99)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by e92_boost View Post
I just went and ordered the 7" VRSF when I upgrade my Turbos I'll be doing the CXR Intercooler
Our 7" intercooler is currently featured on the worlds highest HP 335i @ somewhere around 860whp. You won't need to upgrade
Appreciate 1
      07-23-2015, 06:35 AM   #39
e92_boost
Captain
e92_boost's Avatar
228
Rep
703
Posts

Drives: Smart Car
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Kenosha Wi

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiago@VRSF
Quote:
Originally Posted by e92_boost View Post
I just went and ordered the 7" VRSF when I upgrade my Turbos I'll be doing the CXR Intercooler
Our 7" intercooler is currently featured on the worlds highest HP 335i @ somewhere around 860whp. You won't need to upgrade
Yes I seen that haha shipping was done ASAP by Tiago I was surprised haha my brother receives it tomorrow to install it hopefully he sends me pics
__________________
ESS G1 e90
- BBS E88
Appreciate 1
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST