[335is808]

Originally Posted by BuraQ

Yes and we can improvise

awesome! will be in contact when i get my hsf 4 installed

[FoShizzle]

BruaQ is a COBB required for your flash or can this be done with my BT cable? I'm running the jb4 G5 ISO now, but all this talk about better DCT shifting and more torque has me curious. What's the cost?

[BQTuning]

Originally Posted by FoShizzle

BruaQ is a COBB required for your flash or can this be done with my BT cable? I'm running the jb4 G5 ISO now, but all this talk about better DCT shifting and more torque has me curious. What's the cost?

COBB AP v2 or v3 required if you want us to tune it. COBB AP v3 prefered if you are able to without putting a hole in your pockets, but v2 is fine if your on a budget.

for "other info" please email wedgeperformance@gmail.com we have great discounted deals on the COBB AP v3 also.

[dx1541]

Originally Posted by FoShizzle

BruaQ is a COBB required for your flash or can this be done with my BT cable? I'm running the jb4 G5 ISO now, but all this talk about better DCT shifting and more torque has me curious. What's the cost?

You will seriously not EVER regret ditching the Jb4 G5 like I did... your tranny will thank you just like mine did..

[BQTuning]

I decided to take the car out to the track despite the fear of breaking something again . However I was extra extra careful with the launches. My first run was no LC used, this was just a regular acceleration testing out traction

Keep in mind couple of factors involved here which is often "ignored" about claimed speed traps

Car weight is 3600 lbs (full weight)
Driver 250 lbs
A little over a half tank of gas
All Adaptation reset using INPA 1 hour before going to track

First WOT done at track after adaptation reset with no LC ie normal acceleration off the line (left lane #1434):




Heard a lot of confirmed complaints about the track being slippery, due to the dew fall, so I was extra extra cautious using LC to the point I waisted a lot of time feathering the car up to the 330 marker before I gained confidence in the traction



Here is the log, The E85 stations here in Florida must have already changed their winter E85 blend to E70, I needed a gallon or so more of E85 to make it actually E60+ . Lack of fuel resulted in a lot of timing corrections on the run

http://datazap.me/u/buraq/pbir-testi...8&zoom=202-375

Numbers are showing a strong 122 MPH if I can get traction down pact in the 330 mark. The second run with the 1.95 60" would have dont it.

Will be making more adjustments to hold more boost at 6k RPMs.

[gzim335]

Thats solid bro without weight reductions

[Moutamid]

Originally Posted by BuraQ

I decided to take the car out to the track despite the fear of breaking something again . However I was extra extra careful with the launches. My first run was no LC used, this was just a regular acceleration testing out traction

Keep in mind couple of factors involved here which is often "ignored" about claimed speed traps

Car weight is 3600 lbs (full weight)
Driver 250 lbs
A little over a half tank of gas
All Adaptation reset using INPA 1 hour before going to track

First WOT done at track after adaptation reset with no LC ie normal acceleration off the line (left lane #1434):




Heard a lot of confirmed complaints about the track being slippery, due to the dew fall, so I was extra extra cautious using LC to the point I waisted a lot of time feathering the car up to the 330 marker before I gained confidence in the traction



Here is the log, The E85 stations here in Florida must have already changed their winter E85 blend to E70, I needed a gallon or so more of E85 to make it actually E60+ . Lack of fuel resulted in a lot of timing corrections on the run

http://datazap.me/u/buraq/pbir-testi...8&zoom=202-375

Numbers are showing a strong 122 MPH if I can get traction down pact in the 330 mark. The second run with the 1.95 60" would have dont it.

Will be making more adjustments to hold more boost at 6k RPMs.

Very Nice

[BQTuning]

So what else do I do on spare time ? Well I make myself very busy in tweaking the N54's boost contolls and timing algorithms.

There is much much more work at hand here to be detailed like this, more time on the road and more money in gas.

Will the same map look the same on another 335is ? No, every car will require some sort of adjustment and will require additional tweaking to get it to the level that I have done on my own car which is the model car for all N54B30TO cars.

Its all up to the customer, and again, it all based upon the health of the car, and my car has been beat to hell pretty much. Also the good thing about this is i will be able to identify my own tuning amongst other logs

I still got more tweaking to do on the onset of the first gear WOT for post shift timing

http://datazap.me/u/buraq/bq18?log=0...19&zoom=18-205



Of course there is no additional charge for being detailed, but it will take some time and gas money if you want to be picky like me when it comes to logs.

Anything more in boost beyond this map is the red pill which is not recommended

Was able to race a BMS E30 M4 on similar map: First run he beat me by half cars length @ 150 mph and the second run 1.5 length on second run more likely due to heat build on the back to back runs and loss timing up top

I would always get ahead but after 120 mph he started to creep ahead. So in other words 20 PSI vs 25 PSI DCT vs DCT the 335is did a damn good job

[BQTuning]

Oops forgot to update this thread with the final results. Almost 1 year later today no n54 with stock turbos has been able to beat the current speed trap record at our local track

[deeLow]

Originally Posted by BuraQ

Oops forgot to update this thread with the final results. Almost 1 year later today no n54 with stock turbos has been able to beat the current speed trap record at our local track

[IMG]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/UY...=w1103-h622-no[/IMG]

You need better 60' man. But I get it don't wanna break stuff

[Msport335]

Originally Posted by BuraQ

Oops forgot to update this thread with the final results. Almost 1 year later today no n54 with stock turbos has been able to beat the current speed trap record at our local track

nice trap speed. I recently hit 96mph in the 1/8 th and 119mph in the 1/4 with wedges e60 tune. Fbo, stock turbos, stock inlets and stock exhaust

[BQTuning]

Originally Posted by deeLow

You need better 60' man. But I get it don't wanna break stuff

Yup I decided to granny it off the line after breaking 4 driveshafts.....lol . When I didn't care about breaking stuff my 60" use to be 1.8 - 1.9

Here is a vid for one of the runs...lol, I mean serious granny off the line

Originally Posted by Msport335

nice trap speed. I recently hit 96mph in the 1/8 th and 119mph in the 1/4 with wedges e60 tune. Fbo, stock turbos, stock inlets and stock exhaust

My 335is DCT was on stock inlets, and downpipes with highflow cats. I wasn't catless. The 335is is what laid the foundation for the current E60 maps. When it gets colder you should be hitting the same 121-122 mph trap speeds

[Msport335]

Originally Posted by BuraQ

Yup I decided to granny it off the line after breaking 4 driveshafts.....lol . When I didn't care about breaking stuff my 60" use to be 1.8 - 1.9

Here is a vid for one of the runs...lol, I mean serious granny off the line

My 335is DCT was on stock inlets, and downpipes with highflow cats. I wasn't catless. The 335is is what laid the foundation for the current E60 maps. When it gets colder you should be hitting the same 121-122 mph trap speeds

did you snap all those shafts on a street tire? i can't ever break a 2.0 60ft with my 255/40/17 conti DW's RWD

[BQTuning]

Originally Posted by Msport335

did you snap all those shafts on a street tire? i can't ever break a 2.0 60ft with my 255/40/17 conti DW's RWD

Yes, mostly due to wheel hop