|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
AutoBild: RS6 vs M5 vs E63
|
|
03-25-2008, 01:58 PM | #1 |
Major General
2276
Rep 5,364
Posts |
AutoBild: RS6 vs M5 vs E63
Laptime:
RS6: 1:34,00 M5T: 1:34,81 E63: 1:36,57 0-100 km/h RS6: 4,4s E63: 4,4s M5: 4,9s 0-200 km/h RS6: 14,3s M5: 14,7s E63: 15,1s 60-100 km/h RS6: 2,1 s E63: 2,1 s M5T: 2,1 s 80-120 km/h M5: 2,5 s RS6: 2,7 s E63: 2,7 s Co2 emmisions RS6: 333 g/ km E63 346 g/km M5: 361 g/ km Weight distrubition front / rear RS6: 59/41 M5: 49/51 E63: 49/51
__________________
|
03-25-2008, 01:59 PM | #2 |
Major General
2276
Rep 5,364
Posts |
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2008, 02:38 PM | #5 |
Major General
1228
Rep 8,034
Posts |
This wasn't the result I was expecting, the M5 and the E63 (both in estate form) are a little to close in acceleration for comfort. Either the SMG is making all the difference or the big RS6 is a lot heavier than Audi are saying.
Apart from that the RS6 was the quickest on the track which is a really surprise, where did that result come from. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2008, 05:22 PM | #7 |
Major General
1228
Rep 8,034
Posts |
Just watched the video (didn't understand a word of it ) but you didn't really need to in any case. Watch the pictures was enough to see that the RS6 has extremely good body control compared to the others.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2008, 10:31 PM | #9 |
Lieutenant General
1236
Rep 12,446
Posts |
You don't need that much power in a wagon. Period. It's a complete waste.
I'm tired of these hp wars. When will we start seeing some sort of diet war going on?
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 12:32 AM | #10 |
Private
5
Rep 97
Posts |
Audi ups the power on their AWD cars so that it can compete with the current competition, since awd drains some power compared to the E63 and the M5's RWD drivetrain.
The 40/60 tq split on the RS6 helps the audi with its front bias weight so it'll be more neutral than understeer in the turns. This outcome is all but surprising. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 08:47 AM | #11 |
Lieutenant Colonel
40
Rep 1,917
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 02:32 PM | #12 | |
Smiling Politely
1575
Rep 29,119
Posts |
damn that audi is a front heavy bastard
__________________
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2008, 04:36 PM | #14 |
Bimmerpost Resident Marijuana Consultant
476
Rep 3,202
Posts
Drives: 320i, 325xi, 335Xi, 335i, M3
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Queens/NYC
iTrader: (4)
Garage List 2010 BMW 335i [0.00]
2011 BMW X335i [0.00] 2006 BMW E90 325xi [0.00] 2011 BMW E90 335xi [4.00] 2011 BMW M3 E90 [7.00] 2006 E90 320i [0.00] |
i just think the lap times arent right... i call for a redo lol
__________________
"AMG What! S-Line Who? If you ain't got that M I got no respect for you!" '06 Alpine Weiss E90 320i | '06 The Green Machine E90 325xi | '11 Alpine Weiss E90 M3 ZCP | '10 Silverstone X5M | '11 Alpine Weiss E90 335xi |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2008, 07:50 PM | #15 |
Brigadier General
41
Rep 3,200
Posts |
Why?
__________________
328xi Coupe, Montego Blue on Black with Alum, Step, Sport, Premium, CA, PDC, Cold Weather (Damn Pennsylvania winters)
Current Mods: Heavy right foot - Planned Mods: Lightweight right foot |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2008, 08:57 PM | #16 |
Lieutenant General
1236
Rep 12,446
Posts |
Because it's an ego thing. That's all there is to it. I think it's insane enough to have 500bhp, but c'mon, look at the numbers the RS6 has. Why would you need that in a DD wagon? Why not just spend the money on lighter materials? The numbers are for bragging rights. That's how I see it.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2008, 10:24 PM | #17 | |
Brigadier General
41
Rep 3,200
Posts |
Quote:
You need it in a DD wagon for the same reason you need it in a Ferrari, to go fast. Driving a fast car every day > driving a fast car sometimes.
__________________
328xi Coupe, Montego Blue on Black with Alum, Step, Sport, Premium, CA, PDC, Cold Weather (Damn Pennsylvania winters)
Current Mods: Heavy right foot - Planned Mods: Lightweight right foot |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2008, 05:38 AM | #18 | |
Major General
2276
Rep 5,364
Posts |
Quote:
BUT yeah I think that the RS6 and cars in general are getting too heavy. We should be focusing on emissions and weight etc. Also, the RS6 costs a lot more than the M5 yet isnt that much faster from the info we have SO FAR. Maybe you have to drive it to feel the difference? Tiff Needel said M5 is like the Maclaren F1 and the RS6 is like the Veyron! and he was talking about the power delivery, handling etc. About DDs, I think you are right. You get the impression that 580bhp is "too much" for a car in that class. But then again I know so many people that have M5s for example as DDs. Most people who have M5s as DDs dont use the car to it's full performance.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2008, 05:49 PM | #20 |
Lieutenant General
1236
Rep 12,446
Posts |
FirstClass and HKS:
Both valid points. I must say that there is truth to what you both are saying. If you're willing to have a car that can be a DD and a "fun time" car, then I guess that's all perfectly reasonable. Still, my point isn't so much about how much fast these cars go, or their performance capabilities; it's the fact that the trend is to add weight and power. Why not just maintain current power outputs and find ways to pare down the weight? You know? Reading what you guys posted did make me realize that I do enjoy these types of cars (M3, M5, RS6, etc). I still think that they should pursue a different means of reaching the same goals though. Just my .02.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2008, 06:32 PM | #21 | |
Major General
2276
Rep 5,364
Posts |
Quote:
I'm with you there. I think it's unacceptable for the RS6 to weigh so much. Audi should focus on losing weight. The RS6 wouldnt need such a monster of an engine if it weighed less.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|