|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Front Camber Range
|
|
02-03-2024, 01:33 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
32
Rep 106
Posts
Drives: 2011 BMW 335D
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: League City, TX
|
Front Camber Range
I have seen a lot of discrepancy in how much negative camber can be achieved when swapping out the front wishbone and pulling the pin. It seems like most are only getting about -1.3, but I found one person who claimed to have gotten >-2.
I have already upgraded with M3 parts and pulled the pins to max out the front camber. I would like -1.5 camber and since many have reported not being able to reach -1.5, I decided to order the Dinan fixed plates, which are supposed to add and additional -0.7 degrees. However, I have performed a string alignment but was getting inconsistent camber measurements using a HF angle finder, so I don't know how much front camber I currently have. I intend to get a full alignment, but since I have the camber plates in hand, was debating adding them now before doing so. So, my question is: If I add the camber plates and overshoot the -1.5 target, how much positive camber can I expect to be able add by pulling the strut all of the way to the outside? |
02-03-2024, 10:22 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant
575
Rep 446
Posts |
on my 2011 335i using the same hunter alignment machine with the same technician:
M3 Front Arms Min Camber (struts all the way out): -0.8 M3 Front Arms Max Camber (struts all the way in): -1.4 M3 Front Arms & Dinan Fixed Camber Plates and struts maxed: -2.5 M3 Front Arms & Dinan Fixed Camber Plates and struts in middle: -2.1 I saw accelerated inner tire wear with both 0.2 degrees and 0.05 total front toe and my camber maxed (-2.5). Since going to -2.1 front camber tire wear is perfectly even. Last edited by bmw335ie90; 02-03-2024 at 10:31 PM.. |
Appreciate
1
whyzee1251987.50 |
02-04-2024, 02:48 PM | #3 |
Private First Class
32
Rep 106
Posts
Drives: 2011 BMW 335D
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: League City, TX
|
I appreciate that info.
Are you what toe settings did use? |
Appreciate
0
|
02-04-2024, 05:32 PM | #4 |
Lieutenant
575
Rep 446
Posts |
Depends what you want; minimal front toe makes the car very quick to react and even a bit twitchy. I settled on 0.1 toe in on each side so 0.2 total toe, much less twitchiness but still fairly reactive and also good tire wear.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-09-2024, 12:17 PM | #5 | |
Second Lieutenant
123
Rep 249
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
Scubudo31.50 |
02-09-2024, 02:26 PM | #6 |
Brigadier General
1988
Rep 4,012
Posts |
Well shoot, you'd have a hard time getting a more detailed answer than @bmw335ie90 already gave. Thanks for sharing that!
Remember OP ride height has an effect on camber too. You'll gain negative camber as you go lower so that could be part of why different people have different results. I'm lowered only slightly and while I haven't tried every combo like he did, my results are similar. I have M3 arms, Dinan camber plates, and with the struts pulled all the way inward I'm at -2.7 on each side. I was at -1.8 with the struts all the way outward on the same setup. |
Appreciate
2
Scubudo31.50 Shoooter_j123.00 |
02-09-2024, 02:38 PM | #7 | |
Second Lieutenant
123
Rep 249
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
2
whyzee1251987.50 Will_460cs218.00 |
Bookmarks |
|
|