|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Idea for a Sticky!!
|
|
10-18-2009, 08:32 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
69
Rep 1,705
Posts |
Idea for a Sticky!!
Perhaps we should have a "make the case for your tune in one post" sticky where Vishnu, BMS, Dinan, and who ever else can write a 100 word post on why that particular tune, and can post up to 3 dynos for that particular tune, one on 91/93 octane vs. stock would be required.
This will get rid of the weekly "Who's best" post, keep the discussion clear and relatively concise, and give easier access to Dynos for comparison. There could even be a disclosure at the top... "This dyno shows lower number that that dyno. It's the delta, not the number." type stuff. Just a thought. |
10-18-2009, 09:13 AM | #3 |
Brigadier General
126
Rep 4,248
Posts |
Don't know how popular this will be, but if they do it, I think the rule should be that each can talk about their tune only and not mention other tunes (even indirectly) at all. Also, I think you're missing one of the most important qualities - smoothness & overall driveablility. A dyno number is just one part of the story and really doesn't say much about which tune is best. I'd much prefer a 70hp tune that is extra smooth to a 120hp tune that is rough and peaky...
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2009, 09:41 AM | #4 | |
Major General
161
Rep 7,377
Posts |
Quote:
Everybody that tried my car was stunned by the power and smoothness of the flash compaired to their piggy.
__________________
07 335i AT - MOTIV 750 - MHD E85 BMS flash - BMS PI - JB4G5 - Okada Coils - NGK 5992 Plugs - Helix IC - Snow Stg. 3 - Stett CP - Custom midpipes with 100 HJS Cats - Bastuck Quad - PSS10 - QUAIFE LSD - BMS OCC - Forge DVs - AR OC - ALCON BBK - M3 Chassi - Dinan CP - Velocity M rear Toe arms - Advan RZ-DF - LUX H8 - Level 10 AT upgrade
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2009, 01:12 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant Colonel
69
Rep 1,705
Posts |
I appreciate brevity, but I think the topic is a little more involved than that. Or maybe not!?! Besides, those are just two of the dozen popular options.
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2009, 04:48 PM | #6 | |
First Lieutenant
67
Rep 383
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2009, 04:58 PM | #7 | |
1806
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Quote:
And without access to these CANbus parameters, proper custom tuning would not be possible either right now. And a properly custom tuned PROcede will, without a doubt, make more power than any other tuning option. Period. And in two weeks, you will see another CANbus-related software update which will result in another major performance leap with both 6ATs and 6MTs. So yes, having access to those 200+ parameters is indeed a benefit. And it will be more and more of a benefit as time goes by. I've even said from the start that the code reading/clearing feature of the PROcede is just a convenience. The big deal will be with what we are, and what we will be doing, with the tune itself. Shiv |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2009, 05:51 PM | #8 | |
Captain
47
Rep 967
Posts |
Quote:
In regards to the idea, there will inherently be bias in every review. There is simply no way around it. The the JB reviews will have the usual "makes better numbers, and is cheaper" argument, and the procede reviews will have the usual "canbus advantages etc." arguments. Each tune has its respective benefits, and I think for most, cost is a huge issue here. There is no denying the procede has more control over what is going on, as it has the canbus access, but I think to some those benefits don't outweigh the price difference. In the end, it is an opinion thing. As said before, if the tunes were the exact same price, things might be different.
__________________
| PROcede Rev3 | Vishnu Meth | DCI | BMW Perf. Exhaust | AR Coated/Catless | CP-E FMIC | Quaife | |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2009, 06:11 PM | #9 | |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
5035
Rep 116,174
Posts |
Quote:
Mike |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2009, 06:11 PM | #10 |
Brigadier General
1147
Rep 3,269
Posts |
Here comes another tuner war thread....
__________________
2022 BSM/FR M4 Competition X-Drive 2017 MW/SO M4 ZCP [SOLD] • 2015 MW/SO M4 M-DCT FBO [SOLD] • 2011 AW/CR 335is DCT FBO [SOLD] • 2008 AW/CR 335i 6MT FBO [SOLD] |
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2009, 06:38 PM | #11 | |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
5035
Rep 116,174
Posts |
Quote:
Mike |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-18-2009, 06:51 PM | #12 | |
746
Rep 10,106
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2009, 01:27 AM | #13 |
First Lieutenant
67
Rep 383
Posts |
I always knew Terry had PROcede envy. So much for all of the "marketing" about the "advantages" of not having map loading via laptop, logging, user adjustables, etc. Always say that what you can't do isn't necessary and overly complicated.
Last edited by usc335; 10-19-2009 at 02:32 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-19-2009, 01:32 PM | #14 | |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
5035
Rep 116,174
Posts |
Quote:
mike |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|