![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() PLEASE HELP SUPPORT E90POST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
would this staggered set-up rub?
![]() |
![]() |
Wheels and Tires forum Sponsored by The Tire Rack
Please help to directly support e90post by doing your tirerack shopping from the above link. For every sale made through the link, e90post gets sponsor support to keep the site alive. Disclaimer |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-24-2009, 01:52 AM | #1 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 510
Rep 2,200
Posts |
would this staggered set-up rub?
17 x 8.5" 5x120 ET-40 16.0 lbs
17 x 9.0" 5x120 ET-41 16.6 lbs would they be just a direct fit on the E92 or would I need spacers..im a newb when it comes to wheels link: http://www.**********s.com/_e/Wheels..._Finishes_.htm Also, would it be harder to turn, comin from a 17 x 8" |
11-24-2009, 02:00 AM | #3 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 510
Rep 2,200
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 03:26 AM | #5 | |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 119
Rep 2,433
Posts |
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 11:21 AM | #6 |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 672
Rep 7,148
Posts |
it;ll fit no prob, but Id recommend spacers to push them out to get the flush look
__________________
2016 F80 M3 Mineral White/Sakhir Orange
2013 BMW S1000RR Flat Silver <stolen> 2007 BMW E92 335i Jet Black/Jade Grey <sold> |
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 12:56 PM | #7 | |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 510
Rep 2,200
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 12:58 PM | #8 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 510
Rep 2,200
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 01:03 PM | #9 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 510
Rep 2,200
Posts |
which sizes would you guys go with if you were getting these rims?
Recommended Tire Sizes: 17 x 8.5" (16.0 lbs) - 235/40 - 245/40/17 17 x 9.0" (16.6 lbs) - 245/40 - 255/40/17 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 01:27 PM | #10 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 70
Rep 878
Posts |
It will be far from flush. This looks like a perfect setup for e46. According to the calculator, your back wheels will only stick out 2mm more than stock, and your front wheels will come out to the same point.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 02:09 PM | #11 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 510
Rep 2,200
Posts |
dam tired of trying to choose wheels....bout to just go with some csl reps like most people
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 02:27 PM | #12 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 70
Rep 878
Posts |
It can be a tiresome effort, but it will be worth it in the end when you get the wheels you want in the perfect fitment. For reference, I think that most of the popular wheels out there nowadays like VMR run a 8.5" front with 35 offset and 9.5" rear with 33 offset. That will get you a fitment that's not too conservative and not too aggressive.
I'm running a 10.5" rear with 40 offset, which on the outside edge is the equivalent of a 9.5" with 27 offset and this is what it looks like on my E90 with stock sports suspension. It extends 22mm beyond the point of stock 8.5" wheel with 37 offset. It's about 5mm from being completely flush: |
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 02:54 PM | #13 | |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 510
Rep 2,200
Posts |
Quote:
would i be able to run a 18x9.0 offset 20 in the back without problems |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 03:12 PM | #14 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 70
Rep 878
Posts |
Right, the lower the offset, the more "flush."
Use the calculator and my picture as your reference. Type in 10.5 and 40 in the "current wheel width" and "current wheel offset" boxes. Then type in 9 and 20 in the "new wheel width" and "new wheel offset" boxes. Don't worry about the inside edge for now because we have different widths, but the results are that the 9" with 20 offset will result in the edge extending another 1mm past what mine looks like. Remember, though, that I have an E90. So look around for other members' E92s and what their offset is and use that as reference. Now, whether it will rub depends on a whole lot of factors, including how low you are. If you're on OEM sports suspension, the car is not low enough for rubbing to be a factor. if you're planning on lowering it in the future, you might want to go more conservative. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 03:22 PM | #15 | |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 510
Rep 2,200
Posts |
Quote:
Now I can use the calculator myself ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 04:30 PM | #16 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 70
Rep 878
Posts |
No problem! By the way, the default numbers in the boxes are the width and offset for your stock wheels. The front ones are in the "current" boxes and the rears are in the "new" boxes.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 08:00 PM | #17 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 510
Rep 2,200
Posts |
i've been looking at this one thread with all the pics/setups of e92's and playing around with the calculator...do you know approximately whats the most i can decrease the clearence on the strut side? stock suspension
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-24-2009, 08:16 PM | #18 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 70
Rep 878
Posts |
Yeah, that thread is helpful.
Not sure about E92's but for my E90 with sports suspension, I have 28mm less clearance on the strut side and I'm OK. Maybe someone with an E92 can chime in here? |
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|