|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Battle of the SSKs - UUC Evo 3/DSSR vs. Rogue Octane SSK/WSR on a 335i
|
|
06-16-2010, 02:01 PM | #1 |
Banned
286
Rep 5,876
Posts |
Battle of the SSKs - UUC Evo 3/DSSR vs. Rogue Octane SSK/WSR on a 335i
Here's my situation. I've been on backorder with UUC for more than 3 weeks now and I cancelled the order as it seems like another 1-2 weeks at least until they have them back in stock (spoke to them, backorder is related to their machining process/shop/equipment)..
Now that I've cancelled the order I'm still looking at what I should get, none of the UUC vendors have the DSSR in stock and I've decided to either get both the SSK/DSSR or nothing from UUC for now. What about Rogue's SSK? how does it compare? With a good heavy (weighted) knob, will there really be any noticeable difference? Anyone have any pros/cons of one over the other? Any constructive feedback appreciated.. |
06-16-2010, 02:23 PM | #3 |
Banned
286
Rep 5,876
Posts |
i have but given it doesn't upgrade much over stock i'm not interested..
really, i'm trying to find out if members on this board have had a chance to run the Rogue SSK/WSR and see how it compares to UUC (ideal) or at least to see how it feels for them...UUC has huge issues with manufacturing it seems... |
Appreciate
0
|
06-16-2010, 02:45 PM | #4 |
Colonel
39
Rep 2,084
Posts |
I've heard that the UUC SSK is similar to the B&M that I hated.
The B&M requires very high effort, it clicks audibly in and out of gears, and it is very sticky shifting in and out of 2nd. I couldn't believe it was installed correctly, but when I called B&M, the tech said that what I described was normal. So I replaced it with the BMW Performance SSK, which is much smoother, and I am happy. But you'lll have to try them for yourself. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-16-2010, 04:56 PM | #5 |
Major General
5829
Rep 9,057
Posts |
I haven't been following either companies ssk's for the 335 but based on my past experience with both...... Rogue > UUC by a landslide
Ben @ Rogue is extremely knowledgeable and doesn't sell BS products that i've seen from UUC through the years. Again i haven't been following their SSK's so i can't tell you which is better from that standpoint. Alan
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 06:17 AM | #6 | |
Major General
315
Rep 5,175
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 07:58 AM | #9 |
Brigadier General
328
Rep 3,262
Posts |
Where did you read that ? The SSK is not like a tune to have the manufacturer back down on how much it shortens the travel. The shifts are very short with the BMW SSK
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:00 AM | #11 |
Colonel
39
Rep 2,084
Posts |
On 135i, the BMW SSK sits at an angle if you only install the lever and omit the arm, but that doesn't happen if you install the whole kit. 335i might be different, I don't know.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:07 AM | #12 |
Major General
315
Rep 5,175
Posts |
Does the BMW shifter still use the plastic ball? The design just appears to be inferior to the UUC.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:13 AM | #14 | |
Banned
286
Rep 5,876
Posts |
Quote:
I was just responding to a post above from cstavaru BMW ssk still uses the plastic ball, so does Rogue..Rogue has some good sounding reasoning behind it though, if you get a chance to read it I wonder what your thoughts are |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:16 AM | #15 | |
Major General
315
Rep 5,175
Posts |
Quote:
At the same time, you situation is unique. I can see why you would prefer to do it all at once. I did the same. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:18 AM | #16 |
Private First Class
5
Rep 196
Posts |
i have the rogue one w/the zhp weighted knob it feels great sits at the stock height level and makes the 1st to 2nd much better especially when coupled with the cdv.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:21 AM | #17 |
Banned
286
Rep 5,876
Posts |
Fbis, so you have looked at rogue's ssk but decided uuc was better? I thought you didn't consider it when you chose to go with uuc..honestly, as I said I like uuc from what I've read but given their issues in manufacturing and backorder I'm just impatient I guess..
sashmanparker, thanks for your feedback.. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:24 AM | #18 | |
Major General
315
Rep 5,175
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:33 AM | #19 |
Captain
90
Rep 952
Posts |
What I don't understand about the Rogue shifter is that it still uses the stock plastic sleeve that goes around the ball on the shifter handle. Yeah, it raises up the shifter, but who cares? The B&M I just bought has a sealed spherical bearing where the shifter pivots so it should be very precise and last a long time.
Really these things are mainly about personal preference. It's just like suspension parts where someone will like a stiff suspension with no body roll and don't mind the harsh ride, and others want a soft cushy ride while maintaining decent handling. The past two Mustangs I owned had aftermarket shifters that had very short and precise throws, but the effort was much harder than stock. I didn't mind it at all because I knew the shifter was great quality and could handle hard shifting at high rpm. My B&M shifter feels similar with a little bit more effort than the stock shifter, and it audibly clicks into each gear so you know it's there. Doesn't bother me in the least. Now that I think about it, I'm kind of amazed at how much these shifters cost. I guess it's the BMW tax... $350 for this, plus an additional $129 for the DSSR to complete the whole package. $179 for this made for the T-56 in a Mustang Cobra. Fully CNC'd, lifetime warranty on breakage, and comes with everything you need except a heavy-duty dust boot, which is an extra $8. Installs with 4 bolts on the transmission. Best shifter you can get on a Mustang and feels amazing. I had it on two cars. I even had a guy who owned a race spec Viper comment on how good the shifter felt. I have absolutely nothing against UUC because I have never tried their shifter. In fact, I'm sure it feels amazing. Just commenting on price differences. The only BMW SSK experience I have is my B&M, so take this for what it's worth. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:36 AM | #20 |
Brigadier General
328
Rep 3,262
Posts |
Like I said in another thread, I think that the amount of research put in developing a part is worth way more than the difference in materials used. A modified shifting arm is worth way more than a metal ball to me. I think that if BMW thought a metal ball was necessary they would have done it, given the fact that they went to such great lengths like modifying the shifting arm to ensure the SSK is perfect.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-17-2010, 08:38 AM | #21 | |
Major General
315
Rep 5,175
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|