Dyno results

michael1284 · 10-03-2010, 10:00 PM

Ran on the dyno yesterday. They called it "the heartbreaker" because it runs 15-20 low (so they say). One of the guys that ran map 0 on their jb3 and it said 240hp. Regardless, the dyno's that I usually see have 20 or so more tq than hp (including people that ran that day on the same dyno)...mine were almost dead even. Could there be something wrong?

EDIT: Also sent to shiv and team. Any help is appreciated thanks!

Run conditions:
87F/88F
Humidity - 11%
STD: 1:03

Mods: Helix FMIC, EAS DCI, PROCede v4

Results:
Run 1 - 344.63/343.22 (Autotune)
Run 2 - 353.40/350.27 (Map 2 w/ higher initial boost settings - did not give it time to autotune)

Thanks!

Brey335i · 10-03-2010, 11:27 PM

All dynos read differently. It would have been best if you had a beseline to go by of your own car on the same dyno

michael1284 · 10-04-2010, 09:26 AM

yeah unfortunately i didn't get to do a baseline. stock 335's were going around 240HP on that dyno.

Bimmer This · 10-04-2010, 10:16 AM

Those torque numbers do look a little low.

techlogik · 10-04-2010, 02:31 PM

My dynojet run with GIAC Stage 1 had about the same torque numbers, only 12hp/tq diff. I thought maybe it was because I have an AT...not sure.

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showth...highlight=giac

michael1284 · 10-05-2010, 10:33 AM

so many views, no ideas

Harbringer86 · 10-05-2010, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by michael1284

so many views, no ideas

Sorry but your car is ruined. You have no choice but to take it out back and shoot it. Tell your kids you sent it to live happily on a farm.

OpenFlash · 10-05-2010, 01:11 PM

The results look perfectly fine. Especially if it's a low reading dyno where a stock car dynos at just 240whp. For no exhaust mods, it's pretty darn solid. I couldn't put too much faith in the idea that torque should always be higher than hp as this will vary from dyno to dyno. Keep in mind that FMICs do tend to result in torque loss (since they result in slightly slower spool-up due to internal volume) but offer better top end power (since they offer better cooling).

Shiv

Sniz · 10-05-2010, 02:43 PM

looks good to me, probably a fun car to drive.

10-03-2010, 10:00 PM	#1
michael1284 Colonel 268 Rep 2,647 Posts Drives: 2018 M3 Comp Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: DFW iTrader: (45)	Dyno results - Low torque numbers? Ran on the dyno yesterday. They called it "the heartbreaker" because it runs 15-20 low (so they say). One of the guys that ran map 0 on their jb3 and it said 240hp. Regardless, the dyno's that I usually see have 20 or so more tq than hp (including people that ran that day on the same dyno)...mine were almost dead even. Could there be something wrong? EDIT: Also sent to shiv and team. Any help is appreciated thanks! Run conditions: 87F/88F Humidity - 11% STD: 1:03 Mods: Helix FMIC, EAS DCI, PROCede v4 Results: Run 1 - 344.63/343.22 (Autotune) Run 2 - 353.40/350.27 (Map 2 w/ higher initial boost settings - did not give it time to autotune) Thanks! Attached Images __________________ e92, e90, f30 #DieselLife, e46, f80 Last edited by michael1284; 10-04-2010 at 10:20 AM..
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

10-03-2010, 11:27 PM	#2
Brey335i Banned 122 Rep 4,771 Posts Drives: e46 ///M3 Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Austin, TX iTrader: (11)	All dynos read differently. It would have been best if you had a beseline to go by of your own car on the same dyno
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2010, 09:26 AM	#3
michael1284 Colonel 268 Rep 2,647 Posts Drives: 2018 M3 Comp Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: DFW iTrader: (45)	yeah unfortunately i didn't get to do a baseline. stock 335's were going around 240HP on that dyno. __________________ e92, e90, f30 #DieselLife, e46, f80
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2010, 10:16 AM	#4
Bimmer This Major General 107 Rep 6,473 Posts Drives: 2007 BMW 335i Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Westminster iTrader: (3)	Those torque numbers do look a little low.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2010, 02:31 PM	#5
techlogik Lieutenant Colonel 71 Rep 1,568 Posts Drives: 2020 M340i Dravit Grey Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: FL iTrader: (2)	My dynojet run with GIAC Stage 1 had about the same torque numbers, only 12hp/tq diff. I thought maybe it was because I have an AT...not sure. http://www.e90post.com/forums/showth...highlight=giac __________________ 2020 M340i: Dravit Grey Mettalic. Loaded.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-05-2010, 10:33 AM	#6
michael1284 Colonel 268 Rep 2,647 Posts Drives: 2018 M3 Comp Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: DFW iTrader: (45)	so many views, no ideas __________________ e92, e90, f30 #DieselLife, e46, f80
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-05-2010, 01:11 PM	#8
OpenFlash 1849 Rep 17,960 Posts Drives: A Lot Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: SF Bay, CA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00] 2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00]	The results look perfectly fine. Especially if it's a low reading dyno where a stock car dynos at just 240whp. For no exhaust mods, it's pretty darn solid. I couldn't put too much faith in the idea that torque should always be higher than hp as this will vary from dyno to dyno. Keep in mind that FMICs do tend to result in torque loss (since they result in slightly slower spool-up due to internal volume) but offer better top end power (since they offer better cooling). Shiv
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-05-2010, 02:43 PM	#9
Sniz Lieutenant General 715 Rep 10,584 Posts Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Ellicott City, MD iTrader: (1)	looks good to me, probably a fun car to drive. __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote