E90Post
 


TNT Racewerks
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > PROcede 335i 4.50sec. 0-60mph & 13.02sec. 1/4mi. @ 108.3mph trap speed



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-03-2007, 08:41 AM   #67
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
166
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NaViT View Post
by where in Miami do u live? i gotta see u doing these runs in the street
Not in Miami.
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |
Appreciate 0
      04-03-2007, 12:13 PM   #68
DrM
Second Lieutenant
United_States
29
Rep
225
Posts

Drives: 2007 335i Montego Blue E90
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWPower06 View Post
Thanks, but i already knew all this. I'm wondering why BMW would make the redline 7000, if its more beneficial to shift at 6500
Based on the gearing and the torque curve from an actual dyno sheet, I calculated the optimum shift points. The optimum shift point was about 6750 in the first three gears. The optimum shift points maximize the total area under the torque curve.

So, BMW made the engine rev to 7000 because they can and because that is slightly above the optimum shift point. My suspicion is that people are shifting when they see 6300, which gets them pretty close to the optimum shift point by the time they shift.
__________________
2007 335 E90, 6sp/Sport
Appreciate 0
      04-03-2007, 12:41 PM   #69
mesier1111
Banned
mesier1111's Avatar
38
Rep
1,626
Posts

Drives: 335i coupe, titanium
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bucks County, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sflgator View Post
Yeah, ok, sure. Hey, I've got an idea...why don't YOU buy the PROcede, install it, then uninstall it, then do some timed runs, then install it back in, then do some more timed runs, and then post all your findings.

As easy as it is to install/uninstall the PROcede, this is not the 30-sec. install/uninstall like that of the Turbo Timer. And, frankly, I don't really care what my times were when my car was stock; I just know they're not as fast as my PROcede-equipped car.

WELL SAID.
Appreciate 0
      04-03-2007, 01:04 PM   #70
NaViT
Banned
NaViT's Avatar
United_States
71
Rep
3,404
Posts

Drives: 04 M3/E92 335i
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: N.Florida

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sflgator View Post
Not in Miami.
my bad... where in Florida are u?
Appreciate 0
      04-03-2007, 01:16 PM   #71
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
166
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by catm3 View Post
Cool. Make two runs back to back varying the shiftpoints. I wouldn't be surprised to see the trap higher with a slightly lower shift point.
Well, I did a few more timed runs today, but this time I short-shifted ~ 6,000-6,500rpm from M1-M5 in the 1/4 mi. However, my times weren't as good as b4...did 4.7 sec. 0-60mph and 13.17 - 13.4 sec. 1/4 mi.

There could be other variables though which affected my times, like I had more work stuff in my trunk (which added another ~30 lbs.), I had 3/4 of a tank of gas today (during my best timed runs, I had ~ 1/2 tank of gas), and it's hotter and more humid today (~ 83 degrees F & ~ 60% R.H. vs. 77 degrees F, ~50% R.H.).

Anyway, my feeling is that hypothetically and technically-speaking, your best times may in fact come if you short-shift with the 335i, but it may not make that much of a difference.

The other thing to remember (for me and my situation) is that it's getting hotter and more humid here in S. Florida now. It will get really hot beginning in May and June, and won't really cool off until Oct. or Dec. So, I may not better my best times until next Winter. Don't worry, I'll keep trying though.
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |
Appreciate 0
      04-03-2007, 01:19 PM   #72
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
166
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NaViT View Post
my bad... where in Florida are u?
PB county, but I do A LOT of business travel down to Ft. Lauderdale and Miami, as I cover the S. FL territory for my company (Miami - Melbourne and Naples - Bradenton) and I have several accounts in the Miami area.
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |
Appreciate 0
      04-03-2007, 09:12 PM   #73
BMWPower06
A^M=G is nothing w/o the Power of ///M
BMWPower06's Avatar
United_States
173
Rep
1,817
Posts

Drives: ///M5 & ///M3
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Washington D.C.

iTrader: (0)

i dont get it, every1 was promising sub 13 second 1/4s but i have yet to see one sub 13
__________________
Indianapolis Red BMW ///M5
Appreciate 0
      04-03-2007, 10:49 PM   #74
Driver72
Brigadier General
348
Rep
4,484
Posts

Drives: 335i - to new owners now.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWPower06 View Post
i dont get it, every1 was promising sub 13 second 1/4s but i have yet to see one sub 13

Well keep in mind that the car mags are getting 13.4-13.5 @ 104-106 mph for the car on average STOCK (manual car). Autos are probably .1 second and 1 mph slower.
This is CORRECTED times for sea level AND "ideal" atmospheric conditions.

Personally, I ran a 13.0 flat in an automatic sedan with just the PROcede and that was NOT correcting for elevation (and was on 91 Octane).
Correcting just for elevation it was a 12.96 second pass at 108.1 mph.
This is from a sanctioned NHRA dragstrip, not a GTech or similiar device!
This was also on only my 3rd run ever with the car (I have not gone again since)
So, technically, if you do like the magazines do and correct for elevation, that is in the 12's.

I'm proud and happy with that. As far as I know, I am the only person to get those kinds of times with just the PROcede on street tires, on 91 Octane, with an automatic, and in the heavier sedan too.

Knocking off .5 to .6 seconds and adding 3-4 mph in the 1/4 mile with just the PROcede is pretty darn great and is as much as could be expected.
Knocking another tenth or so off and adding another 1+ mph would be cake with 93 Octane alone.
Appreciate 0
      04-03-2007, 10:52 PM   #75
IrishFlush03
Private
IrishFlush03's Avatar
United_States
2
Rep
56
Posts

Drives: '07 BMW 335i
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Phoenix, MD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Driver72 View Post
Well keep in mind that the car mags are getting 13.4-13.5 @ 104-106 mph for the car on average STOCK (manual car). Autos are probably .1 second and 1 mph slower.
This is CORRECTED times for sea level AND "ideal" atmospheric conditions.

Personally, I ran a 13.0 flat in an automatic sedan with just the PROcede and that was NOT correcting for elevation (and was on 91 Octane).
Correcting just for elevation it was a 12.96 second pass at 108.1 mph.
This is from a sanctioned NHRA dragstrip.
This was also on only my 3rd run ever with the car (I have not gone again since)
So, technically, if you do like the magazines do and correct for elevation, that is in the 12's.

I'm proud and happy with that. As far as I know, I am the only person to get those kinds of times with just the PROcede on street tires, on 91 Octane, and with an automatic, and heavier sedan too.

Knocking off .5 to .6 seconds and adding 3-4 mph in the 1/4 mile with just the PROcede is pretty darn great and is as much as could be expected.
Knocking another tenth or so off and adding another 1 mph would be cake with 93 Octane alone.
Damn! thats fast I have a FX-2 accelerometer, does anyone know how accurate those 1/4 times are? or the 0-60s?
__________________
Silver 335 Red Leather/MT/PP/SP/CW/NAV/CA HAS ARRIVED!!!

1997 Black 4Runner Tan Cloth interior SOLD

2001 Blue BMW 528i Tan Leather interior 2/12" Alpine Type Rs subs SOLD
Appreciate 0
      04-03-2007, 11:00 PM   #76
Driver72
Brigadier General
348
Rep
4,484
Posts

Drives: 335i - to new owners now.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by IrishFlush03 View Post
Damn! thats fast I have a FX-2 accelerometer, does anyone know how accurate those 1/4 times are? or the 0-60s?
In numerous tests with accelerometer devices they range from relatively accurate (within a tenth) to pretty far off (6 or 7 tenths).
But they all pretty much read optimistic (ie: faster than true dragstrip times) in the trap speeds. They usually read .5 to 1.5 mph FASTER than what you'd do at a drag strip.

The main reason for this is a true drag strip averages your speed over the last 60 feet or so of the run. It does NOT give you your speed as you cross the 1/4 mile strip.

The other thing about the acceleration devices is you are NOT at a dragstrip. Most streets will give you better traction at launching than many/most dragstrips. Plus you don't really know if the road is level, AND you are not "in the game" with those devices. Meaning, you have all the time in the world to perfectly launch the car.
At the dragstrip, you stage and have to launch within a second or so.
You have hundreds of people watching, and you are lined up against another car that you really want to beat.

The pressure is on at the dragstrip, there's no pressure on a lonely road by yourself.
It's easy to shoot 10 free throws when you are on the court by yourself, it's a different story when you are "in the game."

Last edited by Driver72; 04-04-2007 at 10:09 AM..
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST