[sbce90]

Originally Posted by SCSRe92

Yea wtf??

mmm...

[PrivateSoftcore]

Originally Posted by DeMerrisK

I used that as 1 example of "pushing it". These cars can also be built to perform on the track as most are very low and have a few degrees of negative camber, both these factors are useful when tracking your car.

You are incredibly naive. You know that as a general rule, cars run negative camber, so you make the leap of faith that negative camber HAS to be good for the car, without qualifying what range it should fall into.

Then you know that as a general rule, lower ride height and lower cg is good for a car, so you make the leap of faith that being lower HAS to be good for the car, without qualifying what range it should fall into.

Just because you have negative camber and a lower ride height doesn't mean it's good for the car in terms of performance. Please stop using retardation to justify this awful trend.

[bamboostk86]

Holy fack..stance is a look not a performance upgrade! people dont set there cars up with the stanced look to go to the track, ask anyone of these dudes that have stanced cars. Why is this subject even being discussed its two different worlds especially when there stanced to extremes and thats what its supposed to be a new school look

[N0Chill 335i]

Originally Posted by PrivateSoftcore

You are incredibly naive. You know that as a general rule, cars run negative camber, so you make the leap of faith that negative camber HAS to be good for the car, without qualifying what range it should fall into.

Then you know that as a general rule, lower ride height and lower cg is good for a car, so you make the leap of faith that being lower HAS to be good for the car, without qualifying what range it should fall into.

Just because you have negative camber and a lower ride height doesn't mean it's good for the car in terms of performance. Please stop using retardation to justify this awful trend.

Did you discredit anything I said with fact? I don't think so. So continue to TRY and insult me. Whatever you need to make your E-Peen feel larger, continue to roll with it. Lmao

[P Casey]

More pics...

[PrivateSoftcore]

Originally Posted by DeMerrisK

Did you discredit anything I said with fact? I don't think so. So continue to TRY and insult me. Whatever you need to make your E-Peen feel larger, continue to roll with it. Lmao

What facts would you like to know? You can go too low, you can have too much camber. Handling performance is a combination of a million different variables. It's not a game of absolutes where "lower is better" and "camber is better", so it's moronic to sit there and pretend that just because a stanced car is lower and has a lot of camber that it is going in the correct direction in terms of performance.

It's like saying that viewing things in a vacuum, putting stiffer springs on your car will increase performance. It's a completely ridiculous statement.

Anyway - stanced is the new rice. It will pass and everyone will look back and laugh at all the embarrassing and ruined cars. The number one way to tell if something is a stupid fad is to look at the demographic making the modifications. If it's localized to a small group of people, chances are it's a horrible fad that will pass in time.

[PSUSMU]

Originally Posted by sbce90

So why is devin banned now?

Do you really have to ask? He's the biggest tool on here.

[Pr335D]

Originally Posted by SCSRe92

Agreed. Then again so are lots of other BMW owners difference is he actually helps other members and gives honest criticism.

[Chris_506]

Originally Posted by Pr335D

[Pr335D]

Originally Posted by SCSRe92

I just hope someone is willing to help all the people as he did. I think I might just have to so this thing you crazy guys call stance

[N0Chill 335i]

Who's Devin?

[MrRager]

there are no pics on this page. PrivateSoftcore is a troll and should be banned. hes ruining a good thread

[ModificaClassica]

I do. At least I think I qualify.

[N0Chill 335i]

Originally Posted by eliemman

I do. At least I think I qualify.

[bamboostk86]

Originally Posted by eliemman

I do. At least I think I qualify.

That is a fine looking automobile slick rick style

[bamboostk86]

Originally Posted by eliemman

I do. At least I think I qualify.

Whats ur setup?

[Stance321]

Originally Posted by eliemman

I do. At least I think I qualify.

I see wheel gap. Looks reverse raked (rear in lower).

[ModificaClassica]

Originally Posted by bamboostk86

Whats ur setup?

ST Coils
Varrstoen ES1 19x9.5 (ET22) & 19x11 (ET20)
Hankook Ventus V12 225/35/19 & 265/30/19

[ModificaClassica]

Originally Posted by moarlow

I see wheel gap. Looks reverse raked (rear in lower).

You are correct. There were four wheels in the back of the car, and I hadn't yet adjusted my coils. Adjusted properly now with a raked stance, back is a bit higher than front.

[Chris_506]

Originally Posted by eliemman

I do. At least I think I qualify.

Me likey!!!

[jonnylin1]

Need camber arms/plates...wtb ~-1.0 more degree up front & controllable camber in rears & flattened rear fenders for wider wheels! Taking donations.





Though seriously, I haven't yet looked into anything...I'm on KW V2s, which sadly have no camber adjust-ability, what plates/arms have you guys ran?

[N0Chill 335i]

F×ckin TITS!