|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Dyno: aFe Pro-Dry S Intake VS Stock Air Box
|
|
09-06-2008, 08:15 PM | #23 |
New Member
0
Rep 28
Posts |
This is quite disappointing. Now I am more curious to see the "oiled" filter dyno. I wonder if anyone can ever duplicate the AFE's results, or at least come close. If not, AFE should probably remove its claimed numbers or else be guilty of false advertising.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2008, 10:27 PM | #24 |
Captain
45
Rep 669
Posts
Drives: '10 C63, '08 X3, '04 Ranger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Another set of dyno results here -> http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...4&postcount=51
Perhaps the results are different once you're dealing with more boost? |
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2008, 10:36 PM | #25 | |
Koala012
20
Rep 637
Posts
Drives: E92 M3 Dakar Yellow
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ, Seoul S.Korea
|
Quote:
AFE intake will definitely run better with more boost. This is why people say that aftermarket intake is not need with stock performance. I need more boost too Don't they increase gas mileage even with stock performance?
__________________
E92 M3 Dakar Yellow DCT | CF Trim
Akrapovic EVO Exhaust | RECARO RS-F SK2 Seat | KW Clubsports | H&R Sway Bar | DCT Cooler | iTG Air Filter | Volk TE37 SL + RS3 Tire |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2008, 10:59 PM | #26 |
Moderator
657
Rep 10,863
Posts |
I would wait for additional tests before jumping to conclusions. This needs to be tested using the aFe first, then stock box, and it needs to be tested on several cars.
The tuners were suggesting that aftermarket intakes only provided benefits at very high airflow demands.
__________________
My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808
my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279 |
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2008, 11:16 PM | #27 |
Drives Smart
54
Rep 2,393
Posts |
I lost a good bit of low end with my 330i, but mid range and top feel better
Intakes are really only for sound, unless you got tune, dps, exhaust and stuff
__________________
08 BMW ///M5 Space Gray/Black 6 speed Engine: RPi GTS exhaust, RPi Scoops, Carbon Filter Delete Exterior: Glossy Black Kidneys, LUX V3, OEM LED License Plate light, Bruce License Plate Adapter |
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2008, 11:30 PM | #29 | |
Captain
65
Rep 986
Posts |
Quote:
If other testing shows that gains can be had with higher boosted cars, then I'll revisit intake solutions when the time comes for it. I just didn't expect such a dramatic loss even on an otherwise stock car. I'd probably keep it in good faith that it would produce results later if it had even just put up the same numbers as the stock air box.
__________________
2008 E92 MT | VTT Stage 2+ 20T | VTT Inlets | JB4 MHD E85 | Fuel-It Stage 3 LPFP w/FPR and Return | BMS PI | AR DP | AE Quad Exhaust | Helix FMIC | ER CP | Tial BOV | DCI | AR OCC | Spec Stage 3+ | SMFW
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2008, 11:33 PM | #30 | |
Captain
45
Rep 669
Posts
Drives: '10 C63, '08 X3, '04 Ranger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-06-2008, 11:53 PM | #31 |
Major General
166
Rep 5,389
Posts |
This is why when ppl ask what mod they should get first, ~ 99.9% of the more experienced E90Posters say "ecu tune -- piggyback or flash first, and other mods later." Although this and a couple other dynos are disappointing, I really would like to see another 2 more with the oiled aFe intake on tuned 335i's. If adding this intake GAINS ~ +10WHP/10-15 lb.-ft. RWTQ, then I think most ppl will be happy with its performance in addition to its looks.
__________________
|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod | | TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers | |
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 12:04 AM | #32 |
Captain
65
Rep 986
Posts |
I updated the original post with the raw data and better graphs.
__________________
2008 E92 MT | VTT Stage 2+ 20T | VTT Inlets | JB4 MHD E85 | Fuel-It Stage 3 LPFP w/FPR and Return | BMS PI | AR DP | AE Quad Exhaust | Helix FMIC | ER CP | Tial BOV | DCI | AR OCC | Spec Stage 3+ | SMFW
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 12:09 AM | #33 |
Brigadier General
3848
Rep 3,311
Posts |
Another aFe dyno that lost power. This one with JB3 tune.
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showthread.php?p=22700 |
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 01:41 AM | #35 |
Modder Raider
795
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
First off, I'd like to thank the OP for providing these results.
Thanks for putting in the time and money so we can see. I was talking with Terry the other day about intakes, tunes, etc, and we believe that an intake will help those greatly with DPs, and not with those who are stock. Obviously we have seen those who have dyno'd their stock car with and without the AFE, and we have seen poor results, but I strongly believe that the results are different with my car or any car who has DPs and a tune. I'd really like this test to be done on a car with a tune and DPs. If I see a decrease then I'll be the first to say that I was wrong.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 01:54 AM | #36 |
135
Rep 1,825
Posts |
Ok first did you have any type of fan setup in front of the car with the hood closed? This would simulate more "real" conditions.....the reason why people fell better throttle response while driving and better "butt dyno" resluts is because air is comming into the engine bay at a much higher rate. Not to mention cooler air also.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 02:31 AM | #37 | ||
Captain
65
Rep 986
Posts |
Quote:
+1 to needing lots more dynos. Quote:
__________________
2008 E92 MT | VTT Stage 2+ 20T | VTT Inlets | JB4 MHD E85 | Fuel-It Stage 3 LPFP w/FPR and Return | BMS PI | AR DP | AE Quad Exhaust | Helix FMIC | ER CP | Tial BOV | DCI | AR OCC | Spec Stage 3+ | SMFW
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 02:33 AM | #38 |
First Lieutenant
5
Rep 367
Posts |
I know everyone keeps saying that a tuned car will be better with an intake. That may be the case. But there is no reason that a stock car should lose power. Im sure more boost will love the better flowing intake but stock should be no diffrent.
__________________
2008 335i E92 6MT (BB Flash)
2007 335I JB+,UR Intake, 6MT (Sold) 2003 350Z Turbo (Dead) 1994 Supra TT (Sold) 1994 RX7 TT (Sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 02:42 AM | #39 | |
135
Rep 1,825
Posts |
Quote:
Its simple the car in stock form (stock boost, no dp's) was designed and tunned that way. With a stock airbox operating in a vaccum like fashion. I also dont think its just a tune that will see gains from an intake but also dp's An engine is just simply a pump. If you add more air comming in its not going to help any if your not getting more air out and vice versa. Last edited by camaross305; 09-07-2008 at 03:12 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 04:40 AM | #40 |
Colonel
742
Rep 2,108
Posts |
if thats the case then i think im gonna take off my afe intake and dyno my car with all the mods i have and then redyno with the afe to see if with a tune and a couple more mods the car gains anything from the afe
__________________
2015 BMW F80 M3: Tractive EDC Suspension / Dinan Anti-Roll Bars / GC Camber Plates / KMP Dual Diff Mount / Girodisc Rotors / GT4 Brake Cooling Kit / PTF Flash Tune / Eisenmann Downpipes / CSF Heat Exchanger / BMS Charge Pipes
2007 BMW E92 335i (SOLD): BMS JB4 / Quaife LSD / Riss Racing DPs / Helix Intercooler / BMS Intake / STETT Charge Pipe / Forge DVs |
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 04:58 AM | #41 |
135
Rep 1,825
Posts |
i think that would be fair...although I think dp's would help
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 05:02 AM | #42 |
Amateur Post Whore
121
Rep 3,035
Posts
Drives: 07 E90 SparkLiN G. 335i
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SocaL
|
WOW.. so my review on the "butt dyno" actually tricked me. Just because my throttle response on the AFE was excellent, I guess it just felt like my car was quicker in performance as well. So.. I purchased the RPI scoops a couple days ago. That proves to have 8~15 hp gains at 40+mph. Sorry to kind of thread jack, but is this advertisement true??
If this one's wrong as well, then I spent a total of half a G for nothing.. lol.
__________________
Go WiTh ThE FLoW.
|BL|RS|PIAA|CFE|CFMC|SSM|CFG|CFDP|ABG|M6|AFE|MTECH |RPI|JB+|CSLT|KWSC| |
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 05:31 AM | #43 |
Koala012
20
Rep 637
Posts
Drives: E92 M3 Dakar Yellow
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ, Seoul S.Korea
|
Intake also reduces the boost psi.
Aftermarket intake will decrease the stock boost about 0.5-1psi. That's what i heard. Maybe lower boost, that's why ?
__________________
E92 M3 Dakar Yellow DCT | CF Trim
Akrapovic EVO Exhaust | RECARO RS-F SK2 Seat | KW Clubsports | H&R Sway Bar | DCT Cooler | iTG Air Filter | Volk TE37 SL + RS3 Tire |
Appreciate
0
|
09-07-2008, 08:24 AM | #44 |
Private First Class
22
Rep 125
Posts |
Okay, I'm dissapointed with the results here with the AFE setup. I was trying to put my stock air box back in , but can seem to get the openings to stretch far enough over to clamp down on the snorkles? Anyone here have a good way to do this? Thanks.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
Tags |
afe, comparison, dyno, intake, stock |
|
|