|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
N54 Tune Comparison Chart (Detailed)
|
|
04-14-2010, 08:39 AM | #23 | |
Colonel
332
Rep 2,663
Posts
Drives: BMW 335xi Sedan; BMW M3 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
|
Quote:
Thanks
__________________
335xi Sedan 6AT | Weather(70-85°F) | N54 Tune Comparison Chart || N54 Turbo Upgrade Comparison Chart
-PROcede Rev. 2.5 ~ v5 (3/17 maps) / JB4 (8/21 maps) / COBB (Stg2+FMIC LT Aggressive maps) †Procede Map2(UT 45 - IGN 40) Aggression Target 2.0 | 0-60 in 4.0sec || †Cobb E30 LT (35% Ethanol/65% 93 Octane) | 0-60 in 3.9sec AR Design Catless DP | BMS DCI + OCC | ETS 5 FMIC | Alpina B3 Trans Flash |235/265 19" Michelin PSS |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 08:40 AM | #24 |
Major
94
Rep 1,216
Posts |
Great job. I had no idea that you could get the GIAC flash for about the same price as the older piggyback units. I am scheduling the GIAC tune today.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 08:43 AM | #25 |
Modder Raider
793
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
As I said on another forum...Superb job.
It's nice that people actually care about others in the community and this took a good portion of your time. There's only one thing that I noticed though. The hp numbers for the Dinan flash seem high for the stage 1. Those numbers correlate more with their stage 3 program. Also, GIAC's peak boost is correct with full mods running stage 1 but normal stage 1 boost is around 15 psi.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 08:53 AM | #26 |
Lieutenant Colonel
36
Rep 1,658
Posts |
Great chart Altec!
Little correction it's 13.7 as he said. My car had 0 mods except the S1 REV2 last year and I've never seen more then 13.7. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 09:47 AM | #29 | |
Colonel
332
Rep 2,663
Posts
Drives: BMW 335xi Sedan; BMW M3 ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
|
Quote:
I'll definitely be updated it.
__________________
335xi Sedan 6AT | Weather(70-85°F) | N54 Tune Comparison Chart || N54 Turbo Upgrade Comparison Chart
-PROcede Rev. 2.5 ~ v5 (3/17 maps) / JB4 (8/21 maps) / COBB (Stg2+FMIC LT Aggressive maps) †Procede Map2(UT 45 - IGN 40) Aggression Target 2.0 | 0-60 in 4.0sec || †Cobb E30 LT (35% Ethanol/65% 93 Octane) | 0-60 in 3.9sec AR Design Catless DP | BMS DCI + OCC | ETS 5 FMIC | Alpina B3 Trans Flash |235/265 19" Michelin PSS |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 09:59 AM | #30 |
Modder Raider
793
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
All of Dinan's numbers are crank hp though--not wheel.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 10:00 AM | #31 |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
5012
Rep 116,150
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 10:13 AM | #33 |
Team Zissou
3141
Rep 10,200
Posts |
Altec, under "user adjustable parameters" you should make a note about the bog/lagfix stuff for the procede column. The reason it's no longer implemented is because it isn't necessary since there is no bog/lag to fix. It's a bit misleading
Last edited by jpsimon; 04-14-2010 at 10:19 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 10:27 AM | #35 | |
Major
23
Rep 1,179
Posts |
Quote:
Damn fine piece of work there -- my hats off to you for your persistence even though i dont use a tune its a great reference when looking into one thanks Altec |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 01:33 PM | #37 |
Captain
110
Rep 728
Posts |
Super cool. Can't wait to forward the .pdf to my non-e90post friends.
__________________
PROcede | AMS FMIC | AR Catless DPs | AR Oil Cooler | BMS DCI Wavetrac LSD | KW V3 w/ Swift Springs | M3 Front Suspension |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2010, 02:47 PM | #38 |
Major General
3506
Rep 6,623
Posts |
Nice work on this comparison, it's cool to review all the various features of each tune!
Glad it's a sticky. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2010, 06:52 AM | #40 |
/r/trees
50
Rep 875
Posts |
wow.
Really nicely done!! I thought it would end up being just marketing fluff but you managed to put all the good bits of info in a nice format. Well done man. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2010, 07:06 AM | #41 |
Brigadier General
114
Rep 3,334
Posts |
Isn't Formers nitrous dyno on a mustang dyno? On a dynojet he would've made way more than 498whp.
__________________
Mods list got too long, lets just say more than enough.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2010, 03:03 PM | #43 |
Mad Linux Guru On The Loose
1180
Rep 5,452
Posts
Drives: 2008 335i Sedan, 2023 M3
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
|
I tried sending a PM to the OP about two apparent errors:
From GIAC web site: GIAC performance software for the 2010 - 2007 E9x 335 smoothly delivers a 40 - 80 hp and 60 - 90 ft-lbs gain. The OP reports gains of 40-50 hp and 50-60 tq which are wrong... |
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2010, 03:05 PM | #44 |
General
675
Rep 26,876
Posts
Drives: 2-325 330 2-335 2-Z4 2-135 X5d
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
|
Awesome info here!
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|