|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
1.47 VS 2.0.2
|
|
12-09-2007, 02:51 PM | #23 | |
First Lieutenant
45
Rep 342
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2007, 02:52 PM | #24 | |
Banned
220
Rep 2,002
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2007, 02:55 PM | #25 | |
First Lieutenant
29
Rep 321
Posts |
Quote:
Another question , if im sitting on 96% setting and my boost is only peaking at 13.6 is it safe to move to 100% slowly of course to stop when i reach 14-15 PSI? Now if my fuel starts to become a problem how will i know? Can you feel knocking and pinging? or will the car just retard timing and i wont feel anyting except less power? Sorry if its a newb question. Im actually enjoying tuning my own car think im going to start tuning more directly as my car tappers off a lot more than other cars after 5000 rpm so think ill up values between 5000 rpm and 6000rpm so i can get a more constant boost log? What do you guys think? im also getting a K&N filter tomorrow so intake doesnt become a problem. I want the 400 torque |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2007, 05:53 PM | #27 |
Captain
207
Rep 607
Posts |
I would continue to slowly raise the %, your only at peak boost for like 1 second then it falls off. If you can get it to hold that boost up top longer it should give you a nice gain.
PS changing 1 setting isn't exactly "tuning" but it is fun to make a change and see a positive result. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2007, 06:41 PM | #28 |
Moderator
279
Rep 4,481
Posts |
@thomasmartin:
Pls. keep in mind that your boost has not been that high because you drive in a 5.500 feet environment, IIRC. The torque bump you miss does not say the power isn't there. Power distribution is just implemented in a different way, a way I prefer. The dyno curves show this. No 335i behaving like a diesel, please. On cooler days boost will be lower as well. Your car should still be able to run @ sealevel on hot summerdays without issues. My 2 cents. - Eugen |
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2007, 07:35 PM | #29 | |
Dancing Machine
48
Rep 1,419
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2007 e90 & 1981 Corvette Predecessors: 2007 BMW 335i E92, 2006 M5, 2008 Viper SRT10 Coupe, 2005 Viper Yellow, 2006 Corvette Z51, 2009 Challenger SRT8, 2006 S4, 2001.5 Nogaro Blue S4, 2006 GTI w/ DSG, 06 Evo IX, 04 S4, 04 911x51, 03 Evo VIII, 98 Eclipse GSX, 96 GST, 92 Galant Vr-4, '70 Grand Prix Model J, '70 Nova, '68 Firebird
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2007, 11:25 PM | #30 | |
Lieutenant General
680
Rep 10,584
Posts |
Quote:
I'd say SLOWLY turn it up and keep an eye on the levels. I would shoot for 14 psi to be safe, if you come down in altitude you don't to be boosting at 18psi or something too high for your octane.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-09-2007, 11:28 PM | #31 |
Lieutenant General
680
Rep 10,584
Posts |
Upgrade....trust me its worth it. I haven't even changed my tq settings yet and I know the car is faster than 1.47....no question. The addictive low end tq of 1.47 is nice, but honestly its pretty useless in the 1st few gears.....it won't hook. Actually come to think of it, V2 has made my first 2 gears even more worthless! Increased power FTW!
the only thing that I liked about 1.47 was cruising at 70mph in 6th and tapping the throttle to pass people, but after the 400rpms of peak tq it doesnt pull as strong as V2.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-10-2007, 12:42 AM | #32 |
Captain
114
Rep 750
Posts |
Don't forget that at 5500ft, when you at idle the map sensor reads -2.2psi. So actually if you boosting 13.6 psi, then the absolute boost is actually going from -2.2 to 13.6, which is 15.8 psi.
But there might be a slight variation depending on which part of Johannesburg you live in, normally 2.0-2.4psi. Check the map reading when you at idle and add that onto you peak map reading. And yeah, you will have a more exagerated drop-off than the sea-level guys at higher rpm, and you power will peak few hundred rpm earlier. |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|