![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Shiv, get started on this . . .
![]() |
![]() |
01-03-2008, 08:52 AM | #23 | |
Moderator
![]() 295
Rep 4,481
Posts |
Quote:
![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 08:58 AM | #24 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 134
Rep 2,426
Posts
Drives: E93 335i M-sport
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey - UK
|
eh ?
not in at any meal I've ever tried... lol SJ |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 09:11 AM | #25 |
New Member
3
Rep 23
Posts |
Diesel hype in Europe has gotten way out of hand. BMW's 3.0 TT diesel is a very good engine in a SUV or a larger family sedan - for towing, cruising, carrying a larger load etc. But for enthusiastic driver who buys a 3-series BMW there is no substitute for 3.0 TT gasoline engine. 3litre TT diesel is a very good engine for cruising, but not when you are trying to have fun/when pushing your car. That is so because of the huge differences in powerbands - gasoline TT engine has max torque from 1300 to 5000rpm. And engine revs freely to 7000rpm and has significant amount of power and torque in the high end. So basically from 1300-7000 is the usable powerband and you have the feeling of a free breathing, high revving egine whith a sporting character. Diesel TT engine has max torque between 1750-2250rpm. After 3000rpm its starts to loose power and at approx 3500-4000rpm you get the feeling that something is choking the engine and tach needle is sort of starting to hit the wall. Its like driving a powerful truck engine. The limited and very low powerband takes all the sportiness away from the car.
There is no point of having the diesel when the gasoline engine has the low-end torque charateristics of a diesel. 335i even reaches max torque 450rpm earlier than 335d. That combined with a rev limiter as high as the E36 M3 S52 engine had is a small miracle itself. This is the combination of characteristics that no diesel to this day is not even close to achieving. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 09:15 AM | #26 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 134
Rep 2,426
Posts
Drives: E93 335i M-sport
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey - UK
|
....umm, so you HAVE driven one right ?
![]() SJ |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 09:45 AM | #28 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 134
Rep 2,426
Posts
Drives: E93 335i M-sport
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey - UK
|
well i had a different experience...
For an everyday highway basher I think the D is a better car ![]() For out and out driving ability then yes, the i will always win. But the d is good really good - don't confuse this with your everyday oil burner ! SJ |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 09:57 AM | #29 |
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() 715
Rep 10,584
Posts |
i would be interested in the 335d if turned high 30's to mid 40's average mpg, any less than that and I'll keep my regular 335.
__________________
![]() |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 09:58 AM | #30 |
Major
![]() ![]() 69
Rep 1,003
Posts |
I think when many people hear diesel they think of big rig trucks so thats probably where the "horrible smell, poor performance" ideas come from. I've actually heard from many europeans that this type of diesel in audi's and bmw's burns cleaner than regular pump gas, helps engine provide much more power, and is much more fuel efficient. I once thought the same way many people here think about diesel, it wasn't up until I spoke to a few real users that my eyes opened up
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 10:00 AM | #31 | |
Moderator
![]() 295
Rep 4,481
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 10:42 AM | #32 | |
Second Lieutenant
![]() 12
Rep 276
Posts |
Quote:
I know for sure the real life savings would be 35%. But I agree regarding smoothness! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 10:44 AM | #33 |
Second Lieutenant
![]() 12
Rep 276
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 10:57 AM | #34 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 14
Rep 710
Posts |
Here is an American review of the 330D http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...-bmw-330d.html
__________________
http://www.insiderpicks.com - The world's best stock picks.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 11:05 AM | #35 | |
Second Lieutenant
![]() 12
Rep 276
Posts |
Quote:
You have never driven a 335D, thats for sure ![]() The real thruth is that talking about usable power the diesel beats the gasoline car by far. If you compare the horsepower between the most used register, 1500-3500 rpm the power looks like this: (measured in the same dyno, rear wheel hub horsepower) 335i 335d 1500 92 115 2000 109 156 2500 136 190 3000 163 231 3500 194 260 And that diesel runs freely and hard to 5000 rpm, max hp at 4150. But the 335i is faster when both cars are revved hard ![]() But the diesel will be faster in many traffic situations, and use 35% less fuel. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 11:17 AM | #36 | |
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 3992
Rep 10,664
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 12:22 PM | #37 | |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 14
Rep 710
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
http://www.insiderpicks.com - The world's best stock picks.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 12:46 PM | #38 |
Moderator
![]() 670
Rep 10,866
Posts |
Daily driver & highway cruiser, 335d is much better.
Sports driving in twisties/canyons, 335i is more fun. Steptronic, 335d is better. Manual tranny and high rpm driving, 335i is better. Fuel mileage, real life, around town the 335i range 13 - 18 mpg, highway 24 - 30 mpg. The 335d is about a third better, around town 18 - 24, highway 32 - 40 mpg. The 320d gives almost double 335i fuel mileage. About 28 city, 45 highway. I really hope that this works for BMW, there is a lot of ignorance to overcome, as demonstrated by some of the ill-informed comments in this thread (stinky, noisy, not fun, ...). Fuel consumption is a really important issue for our nation. In the best of all possible garages, I would have a space efficient (small, lightweight van/touring) BMW diesel, and a Z2 M 4cyl turbo.
__________________
My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808
my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 ![]() Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279 |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 01:11 PM | #39 |
Lieutenant General
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 3992
Rep 10,664
Posts |
http://www.caranddriver.com/previews...35d-coupe.html
This is the 335d test drive, pluse the 335d was in last months Roundel. Last edited by F32Fleet; 01-03-2008 at 02:45 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 01:35 PM | #41 |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() 26
Rep 455
Posts |
um you guys know you can boost the D to over 20psi right?This car will make 600ftlb when modded,that is one of the perks of having a D engine.
here is a vid of a stock 335dt racing some cars(all having way more hp than it)off the line it beats them all pretty bad http://www.autocar.co.uk/VideosWallp...AR=226821&CT=V |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 01:45 PM | #43 |
Moderator
![]() 670
Rep 10,866
Posts |
Might just be me, but manual shifting in a diesel isn't as much fun. It does not have the same need for precision that a peaky petrol engine does. Diesels honk pretty much whatever gear you are in, they have such tremendous mid rpm torque. A steptronic is really well suited to the diesels. I might want a manual on the 4 cyl diesel, mainly to max out the fuel efficiency, but the 335d will be well matched with a step..
__________________
My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808
my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 ![]() Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279 Last edited by stressdoc; 01-03-2008 at 03:02 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-03-2008, 01:47 PM | #44 |
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 40
Rep 660
Posts |
CANT you run veggi oil in desiels also with some extra work......
I would like to see a "Tooned "4.4 v-8 twin turbo thou. Anyone have the weight specs on the up coming v-8 twin turbo? |
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|