[biscuits]

Originally Posted by mistry

I had to pop out last night, so took a drive by the dealers and my car was outside, so I opened her up with the spare key and retrieved my DVD and put in the original.


Sergei is Safe

This is hilarious! So now your on CCTV removing the hooky DVD and replacing with the original...

[booforty]

You will be on one of those CCTV shows! lol

[Exotica]

Originally Posted by ed335d

More to the point, who is the young lady in your avatar?

I put milk tankers in google and she was one of the first results.

[Exotica]

There you go

[willhollin]

Originally Posted by Exotica

I put milk tankers in google and she was one of the first results.

Any action shots?

[Exotica]

Originally Posted by willhollin

Any action shots?

Sure

[mistry]

Originally Posted by biscuits

This is hilarious! So now your on CCTV removing the hooky DVD and replacing with the original...

I know, I even parked really badly with my engine running ready to do a runner. (not that I would run if seen, although that would have been fun)

Strangly no one questioned me, I was expecting to be approached by security.

Originally Posted by booforty

You will be on one of those CCTV shows! lol

I hope so, Shall I report something missing from the car, and ask to see thier cctv.



Anywayback to the plot, they just phoned me and said that it's a known issue and there is no fix! WTF it's a £750 option that you can only use when the car feels like it.

[Exotica]

Get your money back under the sale of goods.

Not fit for purpose then.

[mistry]

Valid point, I'll let you know what they have to say.

P.S. There was too much action in the youtube video, might have to modify title to say NSFW.

[Exotica]

Originally Posted by mistry

Valid point, I'll let you know what they have to say.

P.S. There was too much action in the youtube video, might have to modify title to say NSFW.

Just quote these

Sale of Goods Act 1979. Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994. The Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002.

Key Facts:

• Wherever goods are bought they must "conform to contract". This means they must be as described, fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality (i.e. not inherently faulty at the time of sale).

• Aspects of quality include fitness for purpose, freedom from minor defects, appearance and finish, durability and safety.

• It is the seller, not the manufacturer, who is responsible if goods do not conform to contract.

• For up to six years after purchase (five years from discovery in Scotland) purchasers can demand damages (which a court would equate to the cost of a repair or replacement).

• If repair and replacement are not possible or too costly, then the consumer can seek a partial refund, if they have had some benefit from the good, or a full refund if the fault/s have meant they have enjoyed no benefit.

• In general, the onus is on all purchasers to prove the goods did not conform to contract (e.g. was inherently faulty) and should have reasonably lasted until this point in time (i.e. perishable goods do not last for six years).

• If a consumer chooses to request a repair or replacement, then for the first six months after purchase it will be for the retailer to prove the goods did conform to contract (e.g. were not inherently faulty)

• After six months and until the end of the six years, it is for the consumer to prove the lack of conformity.

[mistry]

My girlfriend is picking up the car, so I've told her to quote the act. I'll keep you posted.

[booforty]

Has she get large set of milk tankers?

[dxb335d]

TITTIES





I love 'em


Off to play with the missus ones...

[JLR1969]

Having just bumped the car this thread has made me laugh... Carlos you are a character for sure.

Tried to play with my ladys bits and she told me to go away

[ed335d]

I would never have thought of googling 'Milk Tankers', unless you're in the dairy business and just got lucky!

[Exotica]

Originally Posted by ed335d

I would never have thought of googling 'Milk Tankers', unless you're in the dairy business and just got lucky!

I was a tanker driver yes.

[PeteJ]

i love google!!

[dxb335d]

Originally Posted by JLR1969

Having just bumped the car this thread has made me laugh... Carlos you are a character for sure.

Tried to play with my ladys bits and she told me to go away

LOL... Glad I made ya smile buddy.

Sorry to hear about the motor though Whats happened exactly?

[SoYank]

Originally Posted by dxb335d

...their indentities ...

Is that where the nipples go inwards?

[dxb335d]

Originally Posted by SoYank

Is that where the nipples go inwards?

Mate, id love to come accross a bird with inverted Nips..

Id love to try coax em out.

[Exotica]

Originally Posted by dxb335d

Mate, id love to come accross a bird with inverted Nips..

Id love to try coax em out.

Inverted lips would be better, thats Adults i mean.

[lons]

Originally Posted by Exotica

Just quote these

Sale of Goods Act 1979. Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994. The Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002.

Key Facts:

• Wherever goods are bought they must "conform to contract". This means they must be as described, fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality (i.e. not inherently faulty at the time of sale).

• Aspects of quality include fitness for purpose, freedom from minor defects, appearance and finish, durability and safety.

• It is the seller, not the manufacturer, who is responsible if goods do not conform to contract.

• For up to six years after purchase (five years from discovery in Scotland) purchasers can demand damages (which a court would equate to the cost of a repair or replacement).

• If repair and replacement are not possible or too costly, then the consumer can seek a partial refund, if they have had some benefit from the good, or a full refund if the fault/s have meant they have enjoyed no benefit.

• In general, the onus is on all purchasers to prove the goods did not conform to contract (e.g. was inherently faulty) and should have reasonably lasted until this point in time (i.e. perishable goods do not last for six years).

• If a consumer chooses to request a repair or replacement, then for the first six months after purchase it will be for the retailer to prove the goods did conform to contract (e.g. were not inherently faulty)

• After six months and until the end of the six years, it is for the consumer to prove the lack of conformity.

Hasn't got a hope in hell - they'll say it's a software problem and as a case in point will cite Microsoft who have supplied and continue to supply every single version of windows more full of bugs than an anthill and definately "not fit for purpose"
On second thoughts - think I'll have a go at sueing MS (better check if I'm running a "pucker" system first though.