![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
JB3 1.22 feels NA compared to Procede V3
![]() |
![]() |
02-16-2009, 08:10 PM | #23 | |
Brigadier General
![]() 353
Rep 4,484
Posts |
Quote:
That doesn't surprise me that the V2 car jumped ahead of you all. The highest dyno I've ever gotten with any of my tunes on an otherwise stock car was the PROcede v2. The JB3 1.0 was next closest with only 4-5 rwhp less. And the last V3 I had (the first V3) was 12-15 rwhp below that yet. And the V2 had the most low end torque for sure, that's why he jumped ahead. I think it's pure boost control. V2 had high levels of boost (around 15-15.5 psi peak) where the current V3 and JB3 on "normal" maps are in the 13-14.5 psi range most of the time. The newer maps also ramp up the boost more smoothly. So even though the V2 was worlds better in smoothness over say the v1.x or JB2, the JB3 and V3 are even tuned to be smoother than V2 with less of a "hit" of boost down low. I never had any issues with my V2, it was a strong runner and made lots of torque, but some had issues and problems with boost spikes and so forth and I believe that's one of the reasons V3 was developed to not only smooth the power out even more, but control boost spikes and be an even safer tune, same goes with JB3 when compared to JB2. The differences you all saw on the road, could easily be equated to individual cars performance, as well as drivers skill in shifting. My guess is you jumped on the JB3 car a bit at first simply because of more low end torque (as Map 4 is pretty mild in the torque department below 4000 rpms. But as you all stated once above 4000 rpms and you were both on full boil you stayed even. The V2 car I'm sure has the best low end torque of them all and a good reason he jumped all at the word go. But yes, JB3 Map 6 (with it's 10-15 rwtq more below 4000 rpms as well as a bit more on the high end) against the V3 on stage 2 would be a good close race I'm sure. But with manual cars, there's a lot more emphasis on driver shifting skill that can skew the results towards the faster shifter. With auto cars, it's just floor it and go, and the car with more power is going to pull away a bit, no driver influence at all. ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2009, 08:13 PM | #24 |
Gixxer Man
![]() 14
Rep 599
Posts |
Good comparison. Why didn't you ever put it on map 6 to see how that would hold up? If you get a chance put it on map 6 and do some real pulls from 3rd gear up. On 93 octane you'll will be safe with no other mods all day long
![]() Also if you want to figure out who has more usable torque next time just kick it into 5th gear starting out at 20mph and punch it. We used to do this with our Evo's all the time where you can really compare the torque/boost characteristics and how they present themselves in real world conditions under load. Its funny as shit too. You'll only be going 60mph after about 10 seconds ![]()
__________________
Stable: 2008 E90 335i JB3 etc..., 2006 Range Rover HSE, K7 GSX-R 600
Former Stable: 2008 MB C300, 2007 Chevy Avalanche, 2006 Evo IX (544awhp), 2005 Sti, 2003 Evo... |
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2009, 08:19 PM | #25 | |
Brigadier General
![]() 353
Rep 4,484
Posts |
Quote:
I 2nd that. I used to do those types of tests too and with manual cars it's a perfect test of low rpm power. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2009, 08:21 PM | #26 | |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 19
Rep 506
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2009, 08:28 PM | #27 | |
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 19
Rep 506
Posts |
Quote:
and once again these are close races, a car length or so. With that said we are not talking about too much really. I guess that's the fun part... being such good door to door racing is always the best ![]() |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2009, 01:04 AM | #28 | |
.
1015
Rep 4,029
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2011 Alpine 335d M-Sport 12.34 @ 110.48mph
2019 i3s Terra, 2008 Black 335i Sedan. 11.11@ 129.47 mph 2008 Monaco Blue JB3 2.0 335i Coupe. 11.33 @ 132.77 mph, 60-130mph: 6.95 seconds 2023 i4 M50 11.48 @ 121.56mph, 3.43 0-60 (dragy) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2009, 01:52 AM | #29 |
Custom Powder Coater
150
Rep 2,784
Posts |
Next time do 2 tests.
20MPH Roll in 4th gear. (race starts at 20MPH @ 1000RPM) 45MPH Roll in 2nd gear. (race starts at 45MPH @ 4500RPM) Jeller should lose the 20MPH Roll test (nearly an inch taller wheel/tire combo)
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2009, 09:35 AM | #31 |
I'm new
![]() 9
Rep 255
Posts |
I'll update this thread when we get some dry roads again out here in the tundra. LOL
We didn't get a chance to change maps, but that certainly is a good idea. I will switch out to 6 now actually and let the car adjust to that tune. I thought without supporting mods that map 4 was the ideal one, but I will give it a shot. Driver72 your post gives us some insight as to why the V2 seems the strongest down low, thanks! It will be fun to keep testing this stuff out, and with 3 cars available quickly, and some acess to another car with procede (and maybe soon another JB car) these real world comparisons give us a good idea of how things line up. x... |
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|