should i go for superchips?

RagingKileak · 05-12-2009, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neo871

thanks! I really look forward to that, keep us posted!

No problem mate!

Matt

neo871 · 05-14-2009, 01:24 AM

still....is there anyone with a 335d and a superchips map that did a dyno run?

neo871 · 05-14-2009, 03:47 AM

superchips.co.uk replied:

"The maximum gain is 47bhp at 3950rpm, the maximum power is 314bhp at 4255rpm, they are not at the same RPM. Same for the torque."

I don't understand exactly what they mean; if the maimum gain is 47bhp which means 333bhp how come they say that the maximum power is 314? Am I missing something?

RagingKileak · 05-14-2009, 04:22 AM

They mean the maximum gain - which isnt at the same point as the original peak power...

So whilst the original peak is not up by 47bhp, the maximum difference between the original and new maps at any point over the range is 47bhp.

Hope that helps!

Matt

neo871 · 05-14-2009, 04:47 AM

yeah...that makes sens but the main idea is this:

it is a gain of 47 but not from 286, from 269 because that's how much their test 335d measured as stock....

RagingKileak · 05-14-2009, 05:16 AM

Yeah Neo - thats what I was trying to say on the previous page but I was kind of set straight, the truth is that we need E92Fan or someone to help us out!!

Matt

neo871 · 05-14-2009, 06:18 AM

lol....that's right, still I don't understand why their 335d pulled out such a low figure for both hp and torque...that is really strange

05-14-2009, 01:24 AM	#24
neo871 Major 144 Rep 1,399 Posts Drives: 340i xDrive MPPSK Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bucharest, Romania iTrader: (0)	still....is there anyone with a 335d and a superchips map that did a dyno run?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-14-2009, 03:47 AM	#25
neo871 Major 144 Rep 1,399 Posts Drives: 340i xDrive MPPSK Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bucharest, Romania iTrader: (0)	superchips.co.uk replied: "The maximum gain is 47bhp at 3950rpm, the maximum power is 314bhp at 4255rpm, they are not at the same RPM. Same for the torque." I don't understand exactly what they mean; if the maimum gain is 47bhp which means 333bhp how come they say that the maximum power is 314? Am I missing something?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-14-2009, 04:22 AM	#26
RagingKileak Brigadier General 202 Rep 4,655 Posts Drives: M3 CS Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Yorkshire iTrader: (2)	They mean the maximum gain - which isnt at the same point as the original peak power... So whilst the original peak is not up by 47bhp, the maximum difference between the original and new maps at any point over the range is 47bhp. Hope that helps! Matt
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-14-2009, 04:47 AM	#27
neo871 Major 144 Rep 1,399 Posts Drives: 340i xDrive MPPSK Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bucharest, Romania iTrader: (0)	yeah...that makes sens but the main idea is this: it is a gain of 47 but not from 286, from 269 because that's how much their test 335d measured as stock....
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-14-2009, 05:16 AM	#28
RagingKileak Brigadier General 202 Rep 4,655 Posts Drives: M3 CS Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Yorkshire iTrader: (2)	Yeah Neo - thats what I was trying to say on the previous page but I was kind of set straight, the truth is that we need E92Fan or someone to help us out!! Matt
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-14-2009, 06:18 AM	#29
neo871 Major 144 Rep 1,399 Posts Drives: 340i xDrive MPPSK Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bucharest, Romania iTrader: (0)	lol....that's right, still I don't understand why their 335d pulled out such a low figure for both hp and torque...that is really strange
	Appreciate 0 Quote