|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Interesting article on 335i auto/Torque capacity
|
|
02-08-2007, 12:58 AM | #23 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 173
Posts |
It would be really nice if Shiv would comment on the tranny as well as the rear differential. Usually the rear end is more sensitive to torque overload than the tranny.
Shawn Phoenix |
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 08:02 AM | #24 | |
Car Junkie
21
Rep 1,279
Posts
Drives: 335is / R8
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PA
|
Quote:
This may not be the most popular post because of all the love Shiv gets, but to sell the kit to auto tranny owners without a warning, or more importantly some research on the tranny specs, was not the most responsilbe business move. I have been following the progress of the unit with plans to buy thinking the tranny was able to handle 400+ according to his earlier posts. Now I guess its time to look at smaller gains from other sources? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 08:38 AM | #25 | |
Colonel
103
Rep 2,760
Posts |
Scarely stuff!!!
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 10:09 AM | #26 |
The 3 Day Diet!
20
Rep 630
Posts
Drives: Space Gray e92, 88 911 Cab
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Conshohocken, PA
|
the number quoted as the Rated Torque capacity no doubt has a design factor of safety built in to it. I wouldn't doubt if it was 1.5 or 2.0. quit worrying. Several folks with and without the Procede have burnt up clutches - definite weak link. Everything in the rear is the same, so we are all in the same boat not knowing the design limits.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 11:10 AM | #27 | |
Major
39
Rep 1,084
Posts |
Quote:
Product Type of prime mover speeds (forw.) Input torque (Nm) 5 HP 19 Standard/Heck 5 300 5 HP 24 Standard/Heck 5 420 6 HP 26 Heck 6 600 6 HP 26 A Heck Allrad 6 600 6 HP 32 Heck 6 750 4 HP 20 Front 4 330 5 HP 19 FL Front 5 310 6 HP 32 AHeck Allrad 6 770 The higer 5-speed HP 24 is good for 309 ft-lb TQ 6 speed HP 26 is good for 442.8 ft-lb TQ 6 speed HP 32 is good for 553.5 ft-lb TQ So the torque the 6AT can handle is 442.8 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 11:39 AM | #28 | |
Private First Class
1
Rep 148
Posts |
Quote:
The 6HP26 and newer 6HP28 are used in the higher Torque diesel versions.
__________________
2007 335I, " Gray", Black Leather, Step, Comfort, ZCW, ZPP, ED - Oct 5, Dropoff Oct 9, redelivery Nov 15.
Last edited by Move.Over; 02-08-2007 at 01:47 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 11:42 AM | #29 | |
Major
39
Rep 1,084
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 11:44 AM | #30 | |
Major
39
Rep 1,084
Posts |
Quote:
The 335i uses a milti-ratio HECK mover. 6 HP 26 Heck 6 600 N-m This is information right off their website. Sometimes when you call companies, you usually talk to some Salesman who doesn't know crap and just busted out an old catalog and gave you that 6HP21. The 335 6AT already dynos at 265-285 ft-lbs. At the crank, it's already 315-340ft-lbs. So you're telling me they put in a tranny with almost ZERO saftey factor??? Give me a break. Give it up dude, you're statements don't make sense |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 11:54 AM | #31 |
Private First Class
1
Rep 148
Posts |
Read the internal BMW document for the E90 I uploaded. Notice the letters TU ( Technically Improved) behind the transmission for the 335i and 335d. All press releases mention this improvement. The problem is that BMW calls them TU and ZF adds 2 to the number. Several people have contacted ZF and gotten the response it is the 6HP21
I.E: 6HP19 TU = 6HP21 (335i) and 6HP26 TU = 6HP28 (335d)
__________________
2007 335I, " Gray", Black Leather, Step, Comfort, ZCW, ZPP, ED - Oct 5, Dropoff Oct 9, redelivery Nov 15.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 12:03 PM | #32 |
Major
39
Rep 1,084
Posts |
Dude, PLEASE brother, give it up. The PDF is inaccurate. It's FLAT OUT wrong and is what the ZF reps are probably using for reference. Your PDF is claiming the 325 and 330 models use this same transmission as 335 when everyone knows they are not the same tranny.
Last edited by bmwzimmer; 02-08-2007 at 12:20 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 12:27 PM | #33 | |
Private First Class
1
Rep 148
Posts |
Quote:
READ!!! the 325 and 330 uses the 6HP19 ( notice no TU) Noticed you quickly edited your 5 speed comment
__________________
2007 335I, " Gray", Black Leather, Step, Comfort, ZCW, ZPP, ED - Oct 5, Dropoff Oct 9, redelivery Nov 15.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 12:47 PM | #35 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 173
Posts |
There is no reason to argue over semantics. Bottom line is we are not 100% sure what the torque handling of the transmission AND the rear differential is. How is this different than the engine itself? Do you think if we officially asked BMW “what is the maximum boost at 5723 RPM that this engine will safely handle?” we would get any answer other than the stock specs?
People are still insisting N54 is not an N family engine at all but based on M54. So the confusion about the rest of the drive train will be with us for a while. Shiv is doing a fantastic job and to his credit he is letting us live vicariously through him by doing his work in plain view. Every time an issue has come up, he has dealt with it. Why don’t we have some patience and have faith that over time he will address this issue as well? Every mechanical or structural design has safety factors build into it. Just because this might be factor 1.5, 2 or 2000 is irrelevant. You can’t just assume since the safety factor was put in there you can ignore the ratings. The factors are there because humans make mistakes, overlook thinks and in larger scheme of things don’t know a lot. Some of us feel comfortable being early adopters in certain areas and some don’t. How many people have commented that they will not buy an untested turbo car in its first production cycle from BMW? On the other hand, plenty of us feel no remorse even after the hassle of having the fuel pump replaced. Even if the torque handling numbers conflict with gains possible through PROcede, plenty of us will take the chance because of the risk reward balance. Shawn Phoenix |
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 12:48 PM | #36 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 173
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 01:21 PM | #37 | |
Second Lieutenant
29
Rep 225
Posts |
Quote:
If you don't believe it, call BMW yourself. I just did. If you want to say that the parts department at BMW is wrong, knock yourself out. I don't really care which transmission is in the car since I have the manual, which can handle the extra torque. However, it will be important to a lot of people here if the transmission can't handle the added torque from the PROcede. In my previous car, a built big block Corvette, I know first hand what too much torque can do. It shredded two TH400's before I had one built well enough to withstand the power. After that, it shredded half shafts and tires |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 01:40 PM | #38 |
Second Lieutenant
29
Rep 225
Posts |
I thought that it was amazing that ZF got within 2% of the fuel economy of a manual with the automatic. I will have to think carefully about the choice between auto and manual next time. The autos are SO much easier to drive in traffic. They also shift so much darn faster
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 01:45 PM | #39 | |
Private First Class
1
Rep 148
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2007 335I, " Gray", Black Leather, Step, Comfort, ZCW, ZPP, ED - Oct 5, Dropoff Oct 9, redelivery Nov 15.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 02:06 PM | #40 |
Private First Class
7
Rep 173
Posts |
Move.Over:
That is a great reference. Thanks for taking the time to find it. Between that news release, which I remember originally came from BMW at the introduction in July and DrM's inquiry to BMW's parts department, it seems clear: 1: ZF 6 HP 19 TU in BMW speak = ZF 6 HP 21 in ZF speak 2: All Gasoline 335i automatic transmissions = ZF 6 HP 19 TU 3: ZF 6 HP 19 TU torque rating = 450 NM 4: Manual transmission in gasoline 335i are type G. Although we don't know the exact rating of the manual, we feel comfortable with it because it is also in the 07 M5 according to your earlier post. I think we now have a legitimate question for Shiv to ponder. Shawn Phoenix |
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 02:18 PM | #41 | |
Private First Class
7
Rep 173
Posts |
Quote:
Manual Ratios: 4th 1.192 5th 1.00 6th .872 Final 3.08 Auto Ratios 4th 1.143 5th .867 6th .691 Final 3.46 6th in manual is a lower gear than 5th in auto!!!! As a man law, anyone who posts on this board during market hours has a lead foot. Lead foots are a lot happier in 5th & 6th gears with the ratios shown for the manual. If they drive the same way with an auto, they'll never see the claimed efficiency which is based on grandma having an egg between her foot and the gas pedal to stay in overdrive ratios. Shawn Self appointed N54 is not based on M54 police |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 02:18 PM | #42 |
Major
39
Rep 1,084
Posts |
The transmission manufacturer doesn't even offer the 6HP21 on their website anymore. It must be disconitinued a while ago.
http://www.zf.com/ZF_ProductDB/user/...uageISOCode=en Here's a Link from zf.com Nothing's for sure tho since all the different sources state different things.... |
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 02:25 PM | #43 | |
Private First Class
7
Rep 173
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-08-2007, 02:28 PM | #44 | |
Major
39
Rep 1,084
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|