E90Post
 


TNT Racewerks
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General BMW News and Cars Discussion > More BMW-Toyota Supercoupe Speculation



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-08-2014, 01:10 PM   #23
OverDriven
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep
296
Posts

Drives: 2011 M3
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

The render looks half nice and half like something a high-schooler would like. Remove the tacky sideskirt and front bumper aero and this would be great. However, overall it's FAR too interesting for BMW, so you can be assured that whatever they release is extremely boring compared to this. We wouldn't want to actually create a passionate car that caters to a niche market now would we?
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 01:10 PM   #24
3M TAPE
Banned
3M TAPE's Avatar
No_Country
350
Rep
1,225
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: States

iTrader: (0)

Supra > any BMW Zs
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 01:27 PM   #25
Diver
Brigadier General
Diver's Avatar
United_States
506
Rep
3,445
Posts

Drives: Black '12 135i - Sold
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Cool looking renders.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 01:32 PM   #26
Mavus
Colonel
Mavus's Avatar
2288
Rep
2,897
Posts

Drives: E90 335i, F80 zcp
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: PA

iTrader: (9)

this would be to extreme for bmw, they are working on the new 3 Series Active Tourer x35iXdrive M Sport
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 01:39 PM   #27
yousefnjr
salty cowboys fan
yousefnjr's Avatar
United_States
6917
Rep
3,682
Posts

Drives: ‘06 Z4MR, ‘20 X7, ‘22 M4x
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Bubble View Post
Supra > any BMW Zs
Apples > oranges! Hard to compare a GT to a roadster, they're pretty different in design intent. Supra definitely wins in mod potential, but a sunny day in a convertible is hard to beat

Whatever the new Z range will be, make a goddamn M version this time please. Not a Z3 m35i, but a real M Roadster. Manual and a LSD, thanks!
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 02:02 PM   #28
Alpine F31
Colonel
Alpine F31's Avatar
United_States
923
Rep
2,710
Posts

Drives: MB E350 4MATIC Estate
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by kardboard View Post
Are we looking at the same render[ing]??! that thing is

More interesting is the FT-1 that toyota has shown. If this partnership is anything like the toyota/subaru one, this new Z5(?) should look like the FT-1 with kidneys.
It's so interesting how two people can look at the same thing and have completely opposite opinions of it. IMO the Toyota FT-1 is
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 02:10 PM   #29
Grock
Banned
Switzerland
2
Rep
99
Posts

Drives: RS5
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: CH

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by s!ke View Post
Hybrid tech
Hmmm, they didn't need them when making I3 or I8.
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 02:19 PM   #30
Shuttlegoose
First Lieutenant
29
Rep
318
Posts

Drives: f30 328, e36 m3
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philly

iTrader: (0)

Yeah I question the hybrid tech also unless Toyota is working on something that we don't know about. Id say some of the Toyota supply chain would be helpful as well.
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 02:27 PM   #31
3M TAPE
Banned
3M TAPE's Avatar
No_Country
350
Rep
1,225
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: States

iTrader: (0)

Lets face it (and be honest), every new BMW models for the last 2 years has been NO GOOD.
Starting with the 3 series (already looks outdated), 2-series (you KNOW it is ugly, I'm sure it drives well), 4 series / M4 (it's just not as good as the E92) and the X5 (come on, more like a facelift). Now the X4 (Macan really is the winner here, even though BMW has created this segment) and this 2 series Tourer (enough is enough). Very sad.

I'm sorry BMW but it's time to ask your people "What da hell is going on in the deisgn department?"
I say bring back Mr. Bangle or fire all design department people including Mr. Karim
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 02:28 PM   #32
gvega702
Private First Class
gvega702's Avatar
28
Rep
137
Posts

Drives: 2004 BMW 325i Premium | Sport
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Las Vegas

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grock
Quote:
Originally Posted by s!ke View Post
Hybrid tech
Hmmm, they didn't need them when making I3 or I8.
Agreed. It would be a shame that if BMW finally makes a car to compete with the 911 that it couldn't do it by itself and would have to partner with Toyota. The only thing I'm looking forward to coming out of this is reliability. That would be great. Otherwise, BMW has the means to do it's own thing. As shown with the i8 and i3. So... What's the deal?
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 02:49 PM   #33
Zayken
Private First Class
United Arab Emirates
34
Rep
107
Posts

Drives: IX1 30e / f40 118i
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dubai

iTrader: (0)

The answer is hiding somewhere here.

From him:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Panke

They moved to him:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norbert_Reithofer

The first one was a nuclear scientist, open minded and with experience from the world largets organisations and huge companies. He refused to see BMW entering low price market.

His succesor
" reach full production of the new generation E90 3 Series, from six months to three.[4] On 1 September 2006 he succeeded Helmut Panke "

is just a BMWs child (works at BMW from 21yo) that cares only for profitability and doenst have any experience outside the brand. He probably believes that whatever BMW says and do is law of god.

It looks like the new CEO sees BMW nearer to Toyota than to Porsche ! But it was the opposite that made BMW brand so strong ....
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 02:51 PM   #34
Falafel Combo
Banned
United_States
3798
Rep
6,673
Posts

Drives: X5 xDrive50i
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrelcognac View Post
Now that rendering is one of the best looking beemers in a long time.

I like it, but it's kind of squinting. I prefer mean aggressive eyes.
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 03:14 PM   #35
r3dbimmer89
Major
r3dbimmer89's Avatar
334
Rep
1,269
Posts

Drives: P-Car
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zayken View Post
The answer is hiding somewhere here.

From him:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Panke

They moved to him:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norbert_Reithofer

The first one was a nuclear scientist, open minded and with experience from the world largets organisations and huge companies. He refused to see BMW entering low price market.

His succesor
" reach full production of the new generation E90 3 Series, from six months to three.[4] On 1 September 2006 he succeeded Helmut Panke "

is just a BMWs child (works at BMW from 21yo) that cares only for profitability and doenst have any experience outside the brand. He probably believes that whatever BMW says and do is law of god.

It looks like the new CEO sees BMW nearer to Toyota than to Porsche ! But it was the opposite that made BMW brand so strong ....
Very interesting.. I can see that being the cause of change in BMW's corporate culture. I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing that Toyota and BMW are collaborating. Toyota needs BMW's performance know-how and BMW need's Toyota's best in class hybrid technology. It's a win-win in my book. I just wouldn't expect this BMW to be more reliable since a lot of the parts are going to be sourced from the current supplier network with current BMW standards.
__________________
Past: BMW (22 G20 M340i, 15 F80 ///M3, 12 E92 335i, 08 E90 335i, 02 E46 325i)
Mercedes-Benz, Porsche, VW, Lexus
Present: 24 992 C2
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 03:16 PM   #36
kardboard
Second Lieutenant
kardboard's Avatar
United_States
33
Rep
293
Posts

Drives: 2006 M3, 2010 135i, 2004 WRX
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Texas

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 135i  [6.00]
2004 WRX  [8.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpine F31 View Post
It's so interesting how two people can look at the same thing and have completely opposite opinions of it. IMO the Toyota FT-1 is
I actually agree with you on the Toyota. It isn't the prettiest either, however I say interesting only because of how similar the FT-86 is to the BRZ. If BMW/Toyota are doing what Subaru/Toyota did, then the FT-1 is a more accurate render[ing] than the one pictured above.
__________________
2006 M3: Individual Blue Onyx on Black. MT
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 03:24 PM   #37
E90_Sam
New Member
1
Rep
24
Posts

Drives: 2007 E90 328i AT
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: CT

iTrader: (0)

Haven't heard anything around my Toyota dealership I work for but I'll be sure to keep everyone posted
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 03:26 PM   #38
Jaylyons1
Private
5
Rep
72
Posts

Drives: R32 GT-R/'16 IS300/Project TBD
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by regular_joe View Post
Hope it doesn't create another supra...
Yea. Re-creating one of the most sought after best performing cars of its time would just be terrible. Who in their right mind would ever want to buy one?



...This guy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by E90_Sam View Post
Haven't heard anything around my Toyota dealership I work for but I'll be sure to keep everyone posted
The dealers are normally the last to know it seems, lol.
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 03:30 PM   #39
Gastoys
First Lieutenant
15
Rep
342
Posts

Drives: 2013 BWM 335i M Sport sapphire
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Greater Seattle Area

iTrader: (0)

I have a Toyota 4Runner - they are poor quality vehicles and I cannot wait to get rid of it! Though the 4Runner is the best SUV under $50k it is still a poor quality in regards to materials.

I hope that what ever they build together its under the Toyota brand or maybe the i3 brand, maybe a i5 is coming as those vehicle are already cheap looking like the Prius.
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 03:40 PM   #40
msh441
Second Lieutenant
msh441's Avatar
22
Rep
219
Posts

Drives: 2007 BMW Z4 M Coupe
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pacific Northwest

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Sure like that orange mock up a whole lot better than the red Supra concept.

I thought I heard the BMW/Toyota collaboration was mainly going to focus on some type of carbon fiber mono-body for the drivers compartment along with chassis/frame development.

Personally, take the orange concept and throw a v8 twin turbo... Or V10 and you've got a Killer GT car that would rival Anything Jag, Aston, Alpha or Maserati is putting out.
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 04:02 PM   #41
Vbcarguy
Second Lieutenant
40
Rep
292
Posts

Drives: BMW m3 e92
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia beach

iTrader: (5)

render looks really nice.
__________________
1953 cj3b willys jeep
1988 e30 M3 s50
1995 Avus e36 m3
2009 Dinan S3-R M3
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 04:08 PM   #42
BMW269
Brigadier General
No_Country
445
Rep
3,888
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Germany

iTrader: (0)

The Toyota FT-1 is not hybrid.


Quote:
Originally Posted by r3dbimmer89 View Post
Very interesting.. I can see that being the cause of change in BMW's corporate culture. I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing that Toyota and BMW are collaborating. Toyota needs BMW's performance know-how and BMW need's Toyota's best in class hybrid technology. It's a win-win in my book. I just wouldn't expect this BMW to be more reliable since a lot of the parts are going to be sourced from the current supplier network with current BMW standards.
Toyota doesn't need BMW's know-how. They did the LFA alone, and it exceeds any BMW ever built. Toyota needs BMW to make their sports car affordable (unlike the limited production LFA) and BMW needs Toyota for economies of scale, otherwise the BMW bean counter will not allow the BMW engineers to build a sports car.
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 04:11 PM   #43
IS3andME
Major
482
Rep
1,189
Posts

Drives: Lexus IS300
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zayken View Post
I think that BMW doesnt have a real competitor against the new 911 , the new JAG coupe, the new SL , "small" Ferraris etc.
Its a very profitable segment and the BMW's board focuses at selling products on masses.

BMW please give to your people a light vehicle and put on S65 engine.

2 seater please ! weight 1350 kg ! PLEASE !
BMW has no SL competitor, no Mercedes SLS/GT and Audi R8 competitor, and they damn sure will probably never have a small Ferrari competitor. And especially since the 458 is on it's way out (When they do the Speciale model, it's the final horray for the vehicle) and supposedly Porsche is developing a 960, which means anything that BMW comes up with has to be in the 600 hp range....
No, BMW puts it's stock in developing minivans like the 2 Series Active Tourer.

I really like the Toyota FT-1...We all wonder what BMw is holding.
Appreciate 0
      03-08-2014, 04:16 PM   #44
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
19201
Rep
19,727
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

So I guess we can officially kill off the crap about BMW remaining "independent" now?
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST