[M5Rick]

^ jmg it's only a discussion on why EV's are impractical for a lot of people, no need to overreact, chill.

[jmg]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

^ jmg it's only a discussion on why EV's are impractical for a lot of people, no need to overreact, chill.

Ironic that you are asking me to "chill" considering someone just tuned their font up to 11 with 7 exclamation points trying to get a reaction out of me. I understand that they will get a free pass because you share an opinion, but that doesn't mean it doesn't reflect poorly on the integrity of your post.

So, before suggesting I "chill" perhaps consider that I have remained calm in the face of the blatant double standards in this thread.

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by jmg

I'm not the one posting with oversized fonts and multiple exclamation marks, and I'm pretty chill.

It'll be easier to just go with the flow and not be so picky, so what if there are oversized fonts, it wouldn't upset me if someone used those against me.
I'll tell you what I'm going to post a record track of what the commentator on BBC Radio 2 posted about the Morrison out of control EV incident in Glasgow when they were talking about it earlier on. Go your Own Way.

[jmg]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

It's called having fun by getting some people to laugh.

I wouldn't be here if I wasn't having fun.

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

But seriously, you have gone a bit overboard with the "echo chamber"crap. Saying some of us comprise an echo chamber really adds no value to your posts.

This was, by all counts, an echo chamber. It's clear you are uncomfortable with the truth, but that doesn't diminish its value.

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

You are trying too hard to convince yourself you are right. And all the psychobabble about strawman this and childish attack that, really is just boring and as well, adds no value.

Labeling strawman fallacies as "psychobabble" reflects a lack of understanding of basic logical reasoning. It's a feeble attempt to undermine something you either aren't capable of, or choose not to understand. A simple google search would remedy your shortcoming.

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

Regarding mandates, I just don't have time or feel the need to explain to you how the US constitutional representative government works. You can learn it on your own.

I know how it works, and I posted several sources supporting my argument. Suggesting that you have to "explain" to me is laughable when I have not shown any indication that I am ignorant of the subject. In contrast, you have misattributed the strawman argument as "psychobabble". Incredible.

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

But in essence the anti-EV position here (as you name it) disagrees with mandating the abolisment of carbon fuel engines is constitutionally justified just because the Govenment officials instituting the mandate were elected into office. Since the topic delves deeply into a political discussion, I've chosen to refrain further issuance of words because political speech is banned on this forum.

Your tunnel vision and selective memory is playing into your bias again. The specific discussion on mandates is how a mandate is or is not democratic, regardless if they are EV mandates or not. The anti-EV echo chamber, however, locked in mandates with EV mandates, because their preconceived bias that they don't like the EV mandates requires them to say that mandates are not democratic, because if they were, then their bias is compromised.

[jmg]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

It'll be easier to just go with the flow and not be so picky, so what if there are oversized fonts, it wouldn't upset me if someone used those against me.

Stating the obvious isn't being "upset". I understand, however, how disappointed some people might be that their infantile attempt to get me to react with anger was a failure, and that the only recourse to save face would be to call me "upset" in the hopes that if they say it enough times, it might happen.

Your insistence on labeling my straightforward observations as "upset" is a pretty weak attempt to distract from the discussion and deflect how childish your ideological peer just behaved.

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

EeeecHoOo ChaAaMmber!!!!!!!

Let me remind you, that you encouraged this behavior... as a grown adult.

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by jmg

Stating the obvious isn't being "upset". I understand, however, how disappointed some people might be that their infantile attempt to get me to react with anger was a failure, and that the only recourse to save face would be to call me "upset" in the hopes that if they say it enough times, it might happen.

Your insistence on labeling my straightforward observations as "upset" is a pretty weak attempt to distract from the discussion and deflect how childish your ideological peer just behaved.




Let me remind you, that you encouraged this behavior... as a grown adult.

Again, take a chill pill

[jmg]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

Again, take a chill pill

Is that a “mandate”?

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by jmg

Is that a “mandate”?

C'mon jmg, lighten up

[jmg]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

Nah, I posted a funny all on my own. I need no encouragement from anyone. I'm independent.

If that makes you feel empowered, that's your business, but the reality is that your previous tepid attempts at trolling were met with misguided enthusiasm from the echo chamber. You're alliance with the mob mentality overshadows any claims of independent thought.

[jmg]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

C'mon jmg, lighten up

You're not being democratic. Don't tread on me.

Edit: /s in case that wasn't clear

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by jmg

You're not being democratic. Don't tread on me.

Edit: /s in case that wasn't clear

Okay then, you're democratic and neutral on this, then what is your stance on the slave trade with children digging for lithium for EV batteries in the DR of Congo and other countries.

[jmg]

Originally Posted by M5Rick

Okay then, you're democratic and neutral on this, then what is your stance on the slave trade with children digging for lithium for EV batteries in the DR of Congo and other countries.

Against.

Finding a significant Li deposit in the US that will provide jobs and keep the US running in the global energy race.

For.

[KRS_SN]

Another EV fire...

[KRS_SN]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

It's called having fun by getting some people to laugh. But seriously, you have gone a bit overboard with the "echo chamber"crap. Saying some of us comprise an echo chamber really adds no value to your posts. You are trying too hard to convince yourself you are right. And all the psychobabble about strawman this and childish attack that, really is just boring and as well, adds no value.

Regarding mandates, I just don't have time or feel the need to explain to you how the US constitutional representative government works. You can learn it on your own. But in essence the anti-EV position here (as you name it) disagrees with mandating the abolisment of carbon fuel engines is constitutionally justified just because the Govenment officials instituting the mandate were elected into office. Since the topic delves deeply into a political discussion, I've chosen to refrain further issuance of words because political speech is banned on this forum.

You have crystallised my thoughts in straightforward language much better than I could.

[jmg]

Originally Posted by KRS_SN

You have crystallised my thoughts in straightforward language much better than I could.

This is an example of an echo chamber at it's finest. In addition to having someone speak for you for lack of independent thought or initiative, you can share in the ignorance of what a strawman fallacy is and improper use of the word "psychobabble" as well as the other problematic pseudo-intellectual nonsense in Efthreeoh's post.

Originally Posted by jmg

I wouldn't be here if I wasn't having fun.

This was, by all counts, an echo chamber. It's clear you are uncomfortable with the truth, but that doesn't diminish its value.

Labeling strawman fallacies as "psychobabble" reflects a lack of understanding of basic logical reasoning. It's a feeble attempt to undermine something you either aren't capable of, or choose not to understand. A simple google search would remedy your shortcoming.

I know how it works, and I posted several sources supporting my argument. Suggesting that you have to "explain" to me is laughable when I have not shown any indication that I am ignorant of the subject. In contrast, you have misattributed the strawman argument as "psychobabble". Incredible.

Your tunnel vision and selective memory is playing into your bias again. The specific discussion on mandates is how a mandate is or is not democratic, regardless if they are EV mandates or not. The anti-EV echo chamber, however, locked in mandates with EV mandates, because their preconceived bias that they don't like the EV mandates requires them to say that mandates are not democratic, because if they were, then their bias is compromised.

[M5Rick]

Originally Posted by KRS_SN

Another EV fire...

I've just watched the vid KRS and the destroyed EV vehicle was a Motability one which carries incapacitated people, as the guy says at the end it's unbelievable that ''Motability is incentivising EV's for these people'' who could have trouble escaping the EV should it catch fire.

[jmg]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

"Oh, my God. You're about to jibber-jabber about jibber-jabber."

Not only are you failing in making a valid argument, but you're expertly validating the point I just made.

The regression to infantile remarks each time you get backed into a corner beyond your grasp is comically redundant.

[jmg]

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

Your posts are just getting ridiculous with all the psychobabble. You have been just arguing about debating process rather than content, so I've stopped taking any of this seriously, which is why I'm now just making jokes.

You start making jokes the moment you're out of your depth.

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

You admitted to the regen function could affect the function of the hydraulic braking system, which is all I have been saying since the beginning of the discussion. There's no point in any further discussion on this topic. All the blabbering about strawman blah blah blah is just that, blathering. Meaningless words i.e. psychobabble. If you want to discuss internet debating techniques psychobabble, hit up fcman, he enjoys such BS discussions like you do.

"All the stuff that shows how incompetent I am at forming cohesive counter arguments without personal attacks and misquotes are upsetting me, so I'm just going to call it psychobabble and and ignore it to protect my ego."

Originally Posted by Efthreeoh

Enjoy your weekend. I'm going to road trip one of my ICEV for about 450 miles tomorrow and not have to find some stupid charging station to sit at for an hour + hoping to find a 150 kWh charger and hope to make it back home with a 20% SOC buffer.

Look how special you are, going on a road trip! Your absence will be absolutely devastating. You have an ICEV? No way! Huzzah! Wow, I wonder what that's like! Could you please also tell us more about your exceptional ability to breath oxygen and walk on two legs! Amazing, I'm sure this road trip will go down in the annals of human history as a astonishing achievement. Don't spend those hours and hours on the road obsessing about how you lost your cool on some bmw forum. Just unplug and enjoy the view! You can look up straw man fallacy when you get back, no rush! Enjoy your trip!

Toodles!

Arrivederci!

Ta-ta!

[jmg]

[M5Rick]

EV's are cheaper? Not any more. UK specific.

[KRS_SN]

Watch the difference between a just stop oil comrade and an educated commentator. This is where I don't agree with ban mandates based on dubious science.

[jmg]

Originally Posted by KRS_SN

Watch the difference between a just stop oil comrade and an educated commentator. This is where I don't agree with ban mandates based on dubious science.

This stop oil comrade is the mirror image of climate change denial fanatics, only on the other side of the spectrum. They posses the same gaps of logic and preconceived bias. They are hurting their own cause as they lose credibility resorting to these disruptive tactics rather than constructive dialogue.

However, regardless on which side of the ideological spectrum one's opinion lies on, what these two videos primarily show is the contrast between:

1. A media outlet interviewing one of the better examples of someone who share the same ideology: an educated and experienced speaker. Together they work in tandem to promote their shared ideology.
2. A media outlet confronting one of the worst examples of the opposing ideology: an irrational fanatic. By disingenuously presenting the fanatic as a representative of an entire ideology, the media outlet is actively trying to weaken the opposing ideology while strengthening their own.

One can observe similar scenarios with the roles reversed, where a media outlet friendly to climate change emergency advocates will cultivate constructive discussions with those they share ideologies with, and confrontation with those it does not.

This is one of the reasons we should not give liberal nor conservative slanted media outlets the time of day. They are both too self-serving.