[Omahastylee]

Originally Posted by prototyp

Apex EC-7 "Race Silver"
f 8.5x18 et35 p1
r 9.5x18 et35 p2

Michelin A/S 3
f 235/40
r 265/35

2006 330i, stock ZSP suspension. No rolls, no spacers.

The fit of these wheels on the car is phenomenal. Aggressive and classy, they look like a proper oem setup. I'm leaning BMW roundels to finish off the job. I intended to get the Anthracite finish but in person it was just close enough to the SGM of my car that you only really noticed that the grays were different.

And there's the weight. This is a street car, a daily driver... but dropping nearly 50lbs of rotating weight is noticeable even around town. Assuming Apex' weights are reasonably accurate, the EC-7 are about 11lb each lighter than the stock ZSP rims.

Thanks to David and Kyle @ Apex.

I had a slight rub at the left rear on compression (dips in the road, with some load in the car). Apparently the left fender-well lining wasn't installed as snugly as on the right side. Sorted now... no rubbing.

Looks nice! I know this is an old post, but I'm about set on my decision to put these on the e90 lci 335i I just bought. Its AW and the anthracite would look nice. Thanks for the pics. Do you still have the car?

[Omahastylee]

Originally Posted by Expert@ApexRaceParts

The 255/35/18 on a 9" wheel is definitely not stretched, it is the proper tire size for that wheel width. This is what a 255/35/18 R-compound tire looks like with the 18x9" ET31 EC-7 wheel:

Do you have any more pics of this car? I'm trying to decide if I like race silver or anthracite better, for EC-7's on a 2011 white e90 M sport. Also, it seems a square set up with the 9 width 18's works with the 235/55 tires, but is questionable with a 235/40 due to the extra amount of tire and the offset pushing the limits in the rear due to the LCI e90's extra rear track as compared to a pre-LCI e90? Seems like there wouldn't be to much difference other than obviously aspect ratio.....I guess it'd also create a bit more rigid ride with having 35 aspect ratio on the front's instead of 40's like the OEM tires....but would ditching run flats and going to nice Michelin PSS make up the difference in ride quality that would otherwise be lost on the lower profile?

[tetsuo111]

Apex ARC-8 Hyper-black 17x9 ET:30 square

2011 E91 LCI AWD - Dual use daily driver / track toy. TCKline coilovers and CPs, lowered on VVT springs, MSI studs and lug nuts

Camber
f: -3 deg, r: -2 deg

Tires
f & r: Bridgestone RE-71R 245/40/17.

No rubbing. The tires are almost finished. The next set will be 255/40/17, either RE-71R or P-Zero Trofeo R, hopefully still with no rubbing.

TMS 12.5 mm front spacers added last week, to square-up the front (1525 mm) and rear (1529 mm) tracks and enhance rotation. The MSI parts are extremely well-made. I understand the function of the brightly-colored lugs (pink is also available), but the aesthetics are a little more "racer" than I prefer for a car that sees mostly street time.

Why go bigger than a 17" rim? They look fantastic, weigh less, handle better, and replacement rubber costs less.

Thanks to the pros at Apex for all your innovation and support. All of my contacts with Apex have been exemplary. After a year of driving on ARC-8s, I remain a fan. 16.5 lbs / rim just makes me smile. The light weight is a feature I enjoy on every drive.

[ApexWheels]

Originally Posted by tetsuo111

Apex ARC-8 Hyper-black 17x9 ET:30 square

2011 E91 LCI AWD - Dual use daily driver / track toy. TCKline coilovers and CPs, lowered on VVT springs, MSI studs and lug nuts

Camber
f: -3 deg, r: -2 deg

Tires
f & r: Bridgestone RE-71R 245/40/17.

No rubbing. The tires are almost finished. The next set will be 255/40/17, either RE-71R or P-Zero Trofeo R, hopefully still with no rubbing.

TMS 12.5 mm front spacers added last week, to square-up the front (1525 mm) and rear (1529 mm) tracks and enhance rotation. The MSI parts are extremely well-made. I understand the function of the brightly-colored lugs (pink is also available), but the aesthetics are a little more "racer" than I prefer for a car that sees mostly street time.

Why go bigger than a 17" rim? They look fantastic, weigh less, handle better, and replacement rubber costs less.

Thanks to the pros at Apex for all your innovation and support. All of my contacts with Apex have been exemplary. After a year of driving on ARC-8s, I remain a fan. 16.5 lbs / rim just makes me smile. The light weight is a feature I enjoy on every drive.

Thank you for sharing, and we greatly appreciate the kind words. Your E91 is a beauty, and well sorted

[tetsuo111]

Originally Posted by ApexRaceParts

Thank you for sharing, and we greatly appreciate the kind words. Your E91 is a beauty, and well sorted

Thanks for that.

Forgot to describe my last interaction with Apex, around a month ago. I had to order a single replacement rim after being tapped on I-5. I expected to buy the rim and be on my way. Instead, Matt reminded me of Apex's policy on replacement rims (50% core credit), had the new rim delivered in a few days, and included packaging and a shipping label for the core return.

Strong work, guys.

[T i h o r]

Apex Arc-8's
F: 17x9" et30 245/45/17
R: 17x10" et25 275/40/17

[addict]

Finally got around to mounting the arc-8's
I wanted concave profile 3 face all around so I went with
(F) 19x8.5 et20, 235/35r19
(R) 19x9.5 et33, 255/35r19

[ApexWheels]

Originally Posted by addict

Finally got around to mounting the arc-8's
I wanted concave profile 3 face all around so I went with
(F) 19x8.5 et20, 235/35r19
(R) 19x9.5 et33, 255/35r19

That is incredibly clean, thank you for sharing

- Ryan

[addict]

Originally Posted by ApexRaceParts

That is incredibly clean, thank you for sharing

- Ryan

Thanks!!

[prototyp]

Originally Posted by Omahastylee

Looks nice! I know this is an old post, but I'm about set on my decision to put these on the e90 lci 335i I just bought. Its AW and the anthracite would look nice. Thanks for the pics. Do you still have the car?

Thanks.. I do still have the car. It has center caps now (and way more rock chips)

Anthracite would be my choice on pretty much any color other than the SGM, the grays are just close enough that you notice they're different. On silver or white... amazing. I still have 'dark metal' wheel envy.

[asquared]

Originally Posted by addict

Finally got around to mounting the arc-8's
I wanted concave profile 3 face all around so I went with
(F) 19x8.5 et20, 235/35r19
(R) 19x9.5 et33, 255/35r19

Wow that is a clean setup. Any rubbing issues and what fender work was done? Seems like aggressive offsets for LCI. Nicely done though

[addict]

Originally Posted by asquared

Wow that is a clean setup. Any rubbing issues and what fender work was done? Seems like aggressive offsets for LCI. Nicely done though

Thanks! No rubbing issues whatsoever at current ride height apart from slight rub on inner fender when backing up at full lock. I haven't rolled the fenders as of yet but I plan on doing so when I go a bit lower.

[Expert@ApexWheels]

Originally Posted by asquared

Wow that is a clean setup. Any rubbing issues and what fender work was done? Seems like aggressive offsets for LCI. Nicely done though

The 255/30-19 tire choice is what allows him to run these wheel specifications the rear without issues. At that ride height, 265/30-19 (popular size for non-LCI sedans) would likely rub without the fenders rolled.

- Ryan

[mojobmw_e90]

Apex ps7 18x9 front 18x10 rear. M3 fitment. No fender modification, m3 control arms with - 2 camber all around. 225 40 front 255 35 rear

[Mr. Tasty]

I need to get some pictures of my new setup
Arc 8s
18x9.5+35mm 245/40/18 square. I love these wheels

[ApexWheels]

Originally Posted by Omahastylee

This is cool. I just learned about this wheels. I have a e90 lci sedan m sport, alpine white. 2011. Wanting 18" csl styles and read that yours are both strong and light. What would be best tire fitment.....or rather, would 235/40's fit on the 18x9 ET30 without stretching to much or rubbing the fender? I'm almost thinking that from a "looks" standpoint, the staggered set up might not be noticeable, but if I did I'd run 265/35 on the 18x9.5, but it seems like the 235/40 on the 18x9 in the rear as well might look pretty darn good because of the slightly smaller offset? I don't mind taller sidewalls.

Happy to help.

For an E90 LCI sedan, keep in mind that you have slightly less clearance in the rear due to the 16mm wider rear track width. This means the 18x9.5 ET35 paired with 265/35-18's will sit closer to the rear fenders then non-LCI sedans or coupes. At stock or M sport ride height, you should be fine, but if the car is lowered, you may need to roll the rear fenders or add a touch of negative camber to prevent rubbing. Dropping down to 255/35-18 is also another option for LCI E90 owners who do not want to mess with any modifications.

If you would like the ability to rotate wheels and tires on all four corners, the square setup makes alot of sense, but you will be giving up some rear end grip in doing so. If you would like to maximize your rear end grip, the staggered fitment with the 265 rear tires would be a better way to go. They are both great fitments, and both present pro's and con's.

For your LCI E90, you could go either way:

Square Fitment:
18x9 ET30 Square - 235/40-18 tires

Staggered Fitment:
18x9" ET30 - 235/40-18
18x9.5 ET35 - 265/35-18

Originally Posted by Mr. Tasty

I need to get some pictures of my new setup
Arc 8s
18x9.5+35mm 245/40/18 square. I love these wheels

We look forward to checking them out!

- Ryan

[hensavage]

Hi Ryan,

Looking to get a set of 19" wheels for my pre lci 335i coupe.

I am stock m sport suspension and looking to as aggressive as possible without camber plates. Would ideally prefer not to roll fender's too but if necessary I am willing.

Does the 19" size make a difference to fitment possibilities over 18"?
Specifically with the EC-7 in 19", what width/offset could I run successfully?
Thankyou
Henry

[ApexWheels]

Originally Posted by hensavage

Hi Ryan,

Looking to get a set of 19" wheels for my pre lci 335i coupe.

I am stock m sport suspension and looking to as aggressive as possible without camber plates. Would ideally prefer not to roll fender's too but if necessary I am willing.

Does the 19" size make a difference to fitment possibilities over 18"?
Specifically with the EC-7 in 19", what width/offset could I run successfully?
Thankyou
Henry

Henry,

Appreciate your interest. We have 18" and 19" options in the EC-7 design, however there a few more choices in the 18" diameter. Here are a few bolt-on 18" and 19" staggered fitments, which do not require camber or fender rolling. I have also added notes under each, which present the opportunity to run wider tires if you are willing to roll the rear fenders.

18" EC-7

Front: EC-7 18x8.5" ET35 profile 1 face - 235/40-18
Rear: EC-7 18x9.5" ET35 profile 2 face - 265/35-18

* 245/40-18 front & 275/35-18 rear is also possible, but depending on ride right height and tire brand, the rear fenders may need to be rolled.

Front: EC-7 18x9" ET31 profile 2 face - 235/40-18
Rear: EC-7 18x9.5" ET35 profile 2 face - 265/35-18

* 245/40-18 front & 275/35-18 rear is also possible, but depending on ride right height and tire brand, the rear fenders may need to be rolled.

Front: EC-7 18x9" ET31 profile 2 face - 235/40-18
Rear: EC-7 18x10" ET33 profile 2 face - 265/35-18

* 245/40-18 front & 275/35-18 rear is also possible, but depending on ride right height and tire brand, the rear fenders may need to be rolled.

19" EC-7

Front: EC-7 19x8.5" ET35 profile 1 face - 235/35-19
Rear: EC-7 19x9.5" ET33 profile 2 face - 265/30-19

* 245/35-19 front & 275/30-19 rear is also possible, but depending on ride right height and tire brand, the rear fenders may need to be rolled.

Front: EC-7 19x9" ET40 profile 1 face - 235/35-19
Rear: EC-7 19x9.5" ET33 profile 2 face - 265/30-19

* 245/35-19 front & 275/30-19 rear is also possible, but depending on ride right height and tire brand, the rear fenders may need to be rolled.

Front: EC-7 19x9" ET35 profile 2 face - 235/35-19
Rear: EC-7 19x9.5" ET33 profile 2 face - 265/30-19

* 245/35-19 front & 275/30-19 rear is also possible, but depending on ride right height and tire brand, the rear fenders may need to be rolled.

- Ryan

[Bours]

Hey guys i have a e90 335i x drive 2011 LCI

Id like to buy arc-8 18x9

Is it concave look ?

Can i fit a 255 tire with these wheeks on a all 4 corners ( square setup )

If i go straggered which option with the arc 8 would you suggest for my car ?

[Expert@ApexWheels]

Originally Posted by Bours

Hey guys i have a e90 335i x drive 2011 LCI

Id like to buy arc-8 18x9

Is it concave look ?

Can i fit a 255 tire with these wheeks on a all 4 corners ( square setup )

If i go straggered which option with the arc 8 would you suggest for my car ?

For your E90 LCI, we recommend the following ARC-8 fitment:

18" Staggered:
F: 18x9" ET30 (Profile 3) - 235/40-18
R: 18x9.5" ET35 (Profile 3) - 255/35-18

18" Square:
F/R: 18x9" ET30 (Profile 3) - 255/35-18

The Profile 3 is the deepest concavity for the ARC-8

-Matt

[Bours]

Originally Posted by Expert@ApexRaceParts

For your E90 LCI, we recommend the following ARC-8 fitment:

18" Staggered:
F: 18x9" ET30 (Profile 3) - 235/40-18
R: 18x9.5" ET35 (Profile 3) - 255/35-18

18" Square:
F/R: 18x9" ET30 (Profile 3) - 255/35-18

The Profile 3 is the deepest concavity for the ARC-8

-Matt

2 questions

If i go square : will 255 fit in front on stock x drive suspension and if im lowered a bit on kw v1 will it still fit ?

If i go straggered : can i run 265 in the back on the dimensions you mentionned ? Will it be better or i should stay with 255 ?

[tdavis42]

Expert@ApexRaceParts
I am also looking at getting a lighter rim and APEX seems to be the choice. I also love the clean look of your rims.

I have an E90 pre-LCI MSport suspension.

I currently have the 17" that came with the sport package and would want to stay 17" just for the sole purpose of not having to spend any extra $$$ on tires than possible. I want to also go to a square setup. These would be my second set for AutoXing only. What fitment do you recommend?