|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Please educate me about the 335i. I'm coming from a 600whp s2000
|
|
06-24-2015, 10:12 PM | #45 |
DIYER
638
Rep 5,521
Posts |
agreed, here is a log of me hitting 19-20psi at 2500 or so, lost traction so I let off lol! I was over boosting a bit, few adjustments to make.
__________________
JB4 G5, Stage 3 LPFP, Stage 2 MOTIV PI, VM 6466 ST, Custom OCC W/ SS lines, ER FMIC, ER CP W/HKS BOV, M3 control arms, M3 guide rods, M3 upper links, M3 front & rear sway-bars, HPA rear toe arms, Wavetrac LSD, HPF Gen 2, DEFIV kit, KW clubsport, Delrin solid SF bushings, stoptech rotors, Rogue Tranny Mounts, 1M bumper, M3 CF hood, M3 fenders, M3 OEM sideskirts, Mtech rear bumper, CSL trunk, MORR VS8.2 rims 245/295
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 11:24 AM | #46 | |
Private First Class
26
Rep 84
Posts |
Quote:
Also, bigger hybrids might build boost a tad later, but they do move more air. even at lower rpms.. doesn't this compensate ? I remember seeing some dynos from hybrids ( doesn't matter what brand) and overal torque figures where above OEM hairdrayers. Even at lower RPMS ...? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 11:27 AM | #47 | |
Major
318
Rep 516
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 11:30 AM | #48 |
Major
318
Rep 516
Posts |
I can't see the rpm axis in your pics? also is this in 4th gear? All the numbers I am quoting for all the different turbos are 4th gear runs from 0 boost low rpm going all the way into boost.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 11:33 AM | #49 | |
Private First Class
26
Rep 84
Posts |
Quote:
You can get RB turbos with or without Ball bearing. Suposedly the ball bearing options should make the turbo spool faster, is this true or not ? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 12:42 PM | #50 | ||
Major
318
Rep 516
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 12:46 PM | #51 |
Banned
2130
Rep 3,553
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 12:47 PM | #52 |
Major
318
Rep 516
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 02:29 PM | #53 | ||
Colonel
351
Rep 2,049
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
'10 e92 N54
DCI intakes, ER chargepipe, TIAL BOV, VRSF 5in FMIC, BMS Downpipes COBB e30 |
||
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 04:51 PM | #54 |
Captain
202
Rep 663
Posts |
As another fellow high HP car owner...save yourself the time and money and don't get the 335. While the motor and tranny are stout, everything connected to them is poorly designed.
The injectors are a fail design, VANOS solenoids fail, stock turbos rattle making your car sound like a POS, mods are expensive, the tuning community is 10 years behind the rest of the car modding world. If I had to do it again I would probably just buy a CTS-V2 and never look back. Only reason I ended up with the 335 in the first place is because of the AWD and I didn't want to look like a boy racer with an Evo X. Having owned boosted Civics in the past its going to be hard for you to adjust to how unreliable and overpriced everything for the BMW is.
__________________
17 M3 Comp
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 05:09 PM | #55 | |
Major General
461
Rep 6,478
Posts |
Quote:
Sounds like you want big power (who doesn't). Ditch the stock turbos, grab whatever single kit you prefer, and get a 62-64mm on it.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 06:23 PM | #56 | |
DIYER
638
Rep 5,521
Posts |
Quote:
Injectors, can handle 100% E85 stock and handle 650ish if not more by themselves abd upwards of 900whp with secondary rail. Stock turbos, anyone serious about modding is going to ditch those and they can be properly adjusted. CTS-V....you will be looking at a lot of 335i bumpers. 10 years behind? Um.....platform isn't 10 years old please explain what makes the 335 tuning world "10 years" behind.
__________________
JB4 G5, Stage 3 LPFP, Stage 2 MOTIV PI, VM 6466 ST, Custom OCC W/ SS lines, ER FMIC, ER CP W/HKS BOV, M3 control arms, M3 guide rods, M3 upper links, M3 front & rear sway-bars, HPA rear toe arms, Wavetrac LSD, HPF Gen 2, DEFIV kit, KW clubsport, Delrin solid SF bushings, stoptech rotors, Rogue Tranny Mounts, 1M bumper, M3 CF hood, M3 fenders, M3 OEM sideskirts, Mtech rear bumper, CSL trunk, MORR VS8.2 rims 245/295
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 07:52 PM | #57 | |
Captain
202
Rep 663
Posts |
Quote:
The CTS-V2 stock is faster than basically every FBO 335i out there. With any mods it's not even a comparison. Not to mention its LS based so you can fall on that car with a screwdriver and gain 20 whp. I agree that no one serious about making power will be on stock turbos, but aftermarket turbos are really expensive for the minimal HP gain and single turbo kits are retardedly expensive. The tuning community is light years behind other platforms, the fact that the JB4 exists in the first place is proof of that. What other platform do you know that uses a piggyback still? People are still figuring out load based tuning. Not all the tables are available to even edit yet. Throwing 6 more injectors at the car and 2 more fuel pumps to run E85 isn't really a great solution IMO.
__________________
17 M3 Comp
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 08:04 PM | #58 |
Major General
461
Rep 6,478
Posts |
The car runs out of high pressure pump, not injector.
If you are arguing that an LS is a superior motor, I wouldn't argue. It's probably the best power motor ever. Most non big displacement V8 cars making 800+WHP on stock blocks are running complete stand-alones because their factory electronics suck. I don't see how that puts the N54 "10 years behind". It's not like 2Js or EJs are rolling around with factory electronics. The 54 has plenty of problems but if the only measuring stick is an LSx, then this is academic.
__________________
E88 N54 Alpinweiss/Coral Red/Motiv HTA 3586r Tial .82AR/Other stuff...652WHP
F30 N55 XDrive EBII |
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 09:04 PM | #59 | |
First Lieutenant
62
Rep 335
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
11 E92 ZCP
02 Honda S2000 -741 whp 471 wtq (dynojet) @ 29.6 psi on e85; now on 34 psi, 800+ whp. Last edited by Spoolin1; 06-25-2015 at 09:09 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2015, 09:05 PM | #60 | |
Major
267
Rep 1,392
Posts |
Quote:
until then we do have to rely on piggy backs to make any sort of big power. Not only that but the short comings of the stock WG solenoid and sensors are very limiting when you start thinking about using the DME as a stand alone. The newer cars are becoming so advanced and harder to crack it just takes a while to get everything you need. I use to think the AEM EMS V2 was a supercomputer until i saw whats really behind the 220+ tables we have discovered, not to mention the hundreds and maybe even thousands of tables we have yet to discover. The AEM is childs play considering. For a tuner to take all that in is ridiculous and i highly doubt we will ever see the day that a tuner understands and alters 100%. Until then we address the issues of what we have at hand and we at least know where to find them.
__________________
Have a single turbo and/or tired of burning up O2 sensors? Ask me about the new ADV O2 sensor retro kits!
335i 2010 e92 M-sport Mods: VM Top mount 6466, Aquamist HSF4 w/custom direct port. VRSF IC + Exhaust 335i 2009 e90 665RWHP VFF900 ST RIP . |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2015, 04:34 AM | #61 |
Lieutenant
166
Rep 466
Posts |
Just pick her up today. Mint condition clean title 2007 with 92,000 miles with every available option and package and 100% stock and of course it's a manual transmission. $14,300. What do you guys think.
I love the car so far beside how butt slow it is. I know it's stock but I was expecting it to be a little faster. I already have a jb4, vrsf castles downpipes and a 7 inch vrsf intercooler ordered. Of course I'm also keeping my s2000 Last edited by Riceball777; 07-10-2015 at 04:42 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2015, 12:49 PM | #62 | |
Private
177
Rep 98
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2015, 01:00 PM | #63 |
Slow.
3800
Rep 7,160
Posts
Drives: N54 6466 100% E85 + Meth
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
Nice S2000.
You should REALLY get a backend flash to go with the JB4. No reason not to. Either go the free flash route or buy the MHD android software. All the new tables and future will be flash based. Do not get a cobb. Outdated. Downpipes, IC, and tune you will be a lot happier with the car. Stock they are not that impressive power wise.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2015, 02:00 PM | #64 |
Driving cars and riding bikes really fast
296
Rep 1,023
Posts |
Dammnnnn... you only paid $14,300?! That's a steal
s2000 is the full time track car now
__________________
335i, sport pkg, 3 pedals, Blacked out, LED markers, OZ Ultraleggera wheels, Firestone Indy 500s, x-pipe, vibrant 1792, PE mod
MHD stage 2+, BMS DPs, ARM charge pipe, Tial BOV, ARM FMIC, dual cone, CSF radiator, M3 control arms, sways, HAWK pads. https://www.strava.com/athletes/8309149 Follow me on Strava |
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2015, 02:13 PM | #65 | |
Lieutenant
166
Rep 466
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2015, 02:29 PM | #66 | |
Slow.
3800
Rep 7,160
Posts
Drives: N54 6466 100% E85 + Meth
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Boston, MA
|
Quote:
The JB4 can only take you so far. As you push more power and/or start using meth/e85...the fuel demands change. These changes can not be dialed in properly thru the JB4. While there are added benefits to the back-end flash, the most important aspect is fueling. Once your car is flashed, the JB4 is used primarily to change maps/control boost. Everything else is dialed right into the DME. Where the jb4 is utilized is ease of boost adjustment on the fly, gear based boost limits, no lift shifting/2 step, helping with wastegate rattle, gauges, tuning/code reading/logging with a smart phone, expanded E85 flex fueling so your mix can vary more, superior methanol integration and lean failsafes, that sort of thing. As all you need is an inexpensive cable and you can flash the car for free you should really do it in my opinion.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|