![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
RB External PCV system :Review and DIY
![]() |
![]() |
05-07-2017, 11:44 PM | #45 |
Second Lieutenant
![]() ![]() 79
Rep 252
Posts |
Im considering doing this myself and have a few questions.
Do you need to have an OCC for the high side? Can you just weld the ports shut instead of tapping and plugging? |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2017, 03:23 PM | #46 |
Nerd
![]() 133
Rep 437
Posts |
So the general opinion is that it's worth doing both to keep excess oil out of the intake tract?
__________________
2009 E92 335i Sport 6AT - Finished, sold
Transport for Ireland - LEAP Pass with TFI smartapp because cars are stupid expensive in Ireland |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2017, 04:14 PM | #48 |
Nerd
![]() 133
Rep 437
Posts |
Well, I've already got the BMS OCC. I guess what I'm asking is if people feel like it's worth doing this in addition to the BMS solution?
__________________
2009 E92 335i Sport 6AT - Finished, sold
Transport for Ireland - LEAP Pass with TFI smartapp because cars are stupid expensive in Ireland |
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2017, 05:51 PM | #49 |
Guest
0
Rep n/a
Posts
Drives:
|
This is the equivalent of asking "my new house has wall-to-wall carpeting, but I already own a broom...is it worth buying a vacuum cleaner too?"
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2017, 06:19 PM | #50 | |
Major
![]() 330
Rep 960
Posts |
Quote:
For one you'll constantly be emptying the low side occ every few 1000mi (which also means topping up oil). It also relies on your occ being better then the stock cyclonic seperator while not being a significant restriction (generally the case but good to check anyway). Also clogs up the engine bay with more stuff. Do some reading and develop an understanding of how the system works and make up your own mind. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2017, 06:32 PM | #51 | |
Guest
0
Rep n/a
Posts
Drives:
|
Quote:
![]() Are you sure you know how the system works? Yes, dumping out the canister every/every other gas fillup is a chore, but so is cleaning the valves themselves. Once you see how much crap this thing collects, you're gonna be happy that none of it had the chance to make it that far. Topping up oil? Where do you think all that oil would have ended up otherwise, back in the crankcase? lol No, it absolutely is not a restriction of any kind, not sure where you got that. Clogging up the engine bay? Given that there are a 1000 other uglier things under the hood that can safely be removed for better aesthetics, etc. this has almost no effect on visual appeal. Do some reading and develop an understanding of how the system works and don't make up your own facts. |
|
05-09-2017, 06:42 PM | #52 | |
Major
![]() 330
Rep 960
Posts |
Quote:
From another post on here: "Cyclone Separator A cyclone oil separator is used in the N54 engine. Here, four of the described cyclones are integrated into the oil-separator housing. The oil mist drawn in from the crankcase is set into a spinning motion in the cyclone. As a result of the centrifugal forces, the heavier oil settles on the cyclone walls and from there drips into the oil drain. The lighter blow-by gases are sucked out from the middle of the cyclone. The purified blow-by gases are then fed to the air-intake system." It's not perfect by any means but it does work. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-09-2017, 07:18 PM | #53 |
Guest
0
Rep n/a
Posts
Drives:
|
In theory, sure, when you have an otherwise stock vehicle, all the stars align, and you have brand new everything, etc. and then, guess what; you STILL get gunked up valves. Hence the main benefit of adding the catch can in the first place.
|
Appreciate
1
matreyia37.50 |
05-09-2017, 08:59 PM | #54 |
Major
![]() 330
Rep 960
Posts |
In my opinion (I'll spell it out this time just so we are clear)
you're much better off going down the path of removing or reducing egr via valve overlap/vanos in your tune if you're concerned and want to reduce carbon buildup. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-05-2017, 06:06 AM | #56 |
Second Lieutenant
![]() ![]() 50
Rep 253
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
UK
V8bait Tuned Built motor FBO 335i |
Appreciate
0
|
08-05-2017, 08:16 AM | #57 | |
Major
![]() 330
Rep 960
Posts |
Quote:
the pics seem to work if you click on them in the bimmerpost android app dunno why though. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2017, 11:37 AM | #59 | |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 496
Rep 2,283
Posts |
Quote:
If that is the case and the drain is pre-check valve, the catch can would only be intercepting what is going back into the intake tract anyways therefor it would have zero effect on the "drain" or "cyclonic separator" and would only be improving the system, just with the added maintenance.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-07-2017, 11:52 AM | #60 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 390
Rep 1,571
Posts |
Quote:
The cyclonic separators are pretty sweet actually. We see a lot of guys saying they do not work, etc.; however they certainly DO work. Many also think getting rid of them is the answer, which is a very uneducated assertion. They do work just aren't 100% effective and nothing will ever be 100% effective. The cyclonic separators function along with the RB External PCV with a finely filtrated catch can (such as the one we recommend) we believe will get you very close. If we were to redesign the valve cover we would like to keep the cyclonic separators however just add more of them to increase efficiency for those who may need it (ie. extreme performance builds). The RB External PCV OCC still would likely be a great idea to catch whatever still makes it past. Rob |
|
Appreciate
2
Tim603495.50 |
08-17-2017, 10:31 AM | #61 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 496
Rep 2,283
Posts |
Hey Rob, I've had a couple people tell me the -6AN lines look too restrictive for the Low Side PCV system but I'm not sure if I agree with them. What are your thoughts?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-17-2017, 10:50 AM | #62 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 390
Rep 1,571
Posts |
|
08-17-2017, 11:14 AM | #63 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 496
Rep 2,283
Posts |
Lol pretty much what I did. Just out of curiosity how did you come up with that size? Just wondering what the rhyme or reason was behind it
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-17-2017, 12:07 PM | #64 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 390
Rep 1,571
Posts |
Quote:
1) This is a low load PCV function and not some VTA setup where big hoses matter. 2) The hose itself is under significant vacuum with the intake manifold as a vacuum reference source, and the valve itself adjusts the vacuum flow upon the crankcase per vacuum conditions applied via the intake manifold reference. The valve is closed under boost, thus hose size matters not in this condition. 3) The valve orifice is ID .167" and the hose ID is ~.350", so the valve is more of a restriction than the hose. 4) The OEM internal route is slightly smaller at points than the area of the -6AN hose. 5) The only way to get more low load vacuum while retaining the PCV function is to add another PCV Valve with a separate vacuum reference, but there is not a need for MORE LOW load vacuum so this is a moot point. In short watch your sources especially on this topic where less than 1% of the masses seem to understand the function. ![]() Thanks, Rob Last edited by Rob@RBTurbo; 08-17-2017 at 12:18 PM.. |
|
08-17-2017, 02:15 PM | #65 | |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 496
Rep 2,283
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-23-2017, 10:28 AM | #66 |
Colonel
![]() ![]() 496
Rep 2,283
Posts |
Hey Rob, the T that connects to the throttle body, where does that OEM vac line go to? The fuel tank or something?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|