![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Coding performance brakes
![]() |
![]() |
12-18-2016, 05:10 PM | #46 | |
Major
![]() 429
Rep 957
Posts |
Quote:
Then use NCSExpert to code the entire car. All modules will change settings to reflect the new hardware you added to your VO. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2016, 07:51 AM | #47 |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Hello,
Here are phtos for the calipers fitted to my car. the product # would be 34110444769 that will cover both front x2 and rear x2. Front: 6-piston aluminum fixed-calipers http://cdn.snsimg.carview.co.jp/mink...t=b12892fc6df6 Rear:2-piston aluminum fixed-calipers http://cdn.snsimg.carview.co.jp/mink...t=b12892fc6df6 thanks |
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2016, 08:02 AM | #48 | |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
thanks for the confirmation. i hope this will apply to the retrofit of bp brake for E90 as well. do you think the changes take effect when dsc/abs functions are triggered? in other words, the brake feel will not be changed in normal usage? br// |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2016, 09:03 AM | #49 | ||
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 4312
Rep 9,230
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
"the rear was not normal option but the size of roter (center ring) was modified to be fitted" |
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2016, 09:41 AM | #50 | |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.bplus-bmw.com/blog/data/upfile/3533-1.jpg cheers// |
|
Appreciate
1
feuer4312.00 |
12-19-2016, 03:20 PM | #51 | |
Major General
![]() ![]() ![]() 4312
Rep 9,230
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
1
Dan Bilzerian356.50 |
12-19-2016, 10:23 PM | #52 | |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
thankyou for the information. wonder if vo value is exactly ‘+SPBR’? my concern is that the rear caliper is not a standard option as described previously (in the thread, rotor ring modified smaller). each parameter for this change coded by the ncsexpert may not be fitted to what it (bp brake) was installed. thanks// |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-19-2016, 10:35 PM | #53 |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2016, 07:49 AM | #54 | |
Major
![]() 429
Rep 957
Posts |
Quote:
Obviously there isn't any special code for aftermarket BBK. You'll just have to code the attribute for the BMWperformance brakes. ‘+SPBR’ will at least change your factory settings CLOSER to a more performance oriented brake setup (more front bias). Last edited by bNks334; 12-20-2016 at 08:15 AM.. |
|
12-20-2016, 04:20 PM | #55 | |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
Thakyou for the information. I really want to try this but I have a little concern on the effect to see if it is really functioning after attribute is added. My understanding is that the feature is triggered only when the car reach a certain speed with DSC/abs activated. Can I know if it is functioning after this change is made? Sorry for many question... ![]() Cheers// |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2016, 08:30 PM | #56 | |
Major
![]() 429
Rep 957
Posts |
Quote:
You could dump your .TRC file before and after the coding to verify things changed. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2016, 09:11 PM | #57 | |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
Just one things to confirm. which ecu module will be affected by adding +SPBR in vo for those comparisons of .trc? such as dsc? or others? thanks// |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-17-2017, 10:39 PM | #58 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 480
Rep 1,600
Posts |
To make things more interesting, in ISTA/P i retrofitted sport brakes to my 135i. Yes, the option is there but unlike retrofitting an AGM or larger battery there is no undoing the change.
The main difference i noticed was the pedal was lighter. Travel is similar. If anything, i actually dislike it because they feel more difficult to modulate. Im still new to coding and hacking the car's software but one day I will try and undo it by removing the SPBR parameter described earlier. I took a dump of the TRC file before i started fiddling with the various options too and compared it to the comparison document linked earlier. There isnt anything that stands out.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-18-2017, 08:29 AM | #59 | |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
we are not able drastically to feel the change when it is activated. however i think that this will take effect when dsc is activated in the condition where the wheels are slippy speed. what do you think? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-18-2017, 09:45 AM | #60 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 735
Rep 1,819
Posts |
Quote:
If someone coded this and did not feel the difference than something went wrong with the coding.
__________________
2009 118i Monaco Blue "Maximillion"
2009 335i Saphire Black M Sport "Leopold" Cobb stage 2 aggressive tune, Mishimoto FMIC, Cobb charge pipe, Cobb catted down pipes, Forge diverter valves, BMS inlets and DCI, Cyba scoops and M Individual Audio retrofit and M3 gauge cluster retrofit. 2011 328i Titan Silver M Sport "Franzel" <--Wife's car |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-18-2017, 10:40 AM | #61 | |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
i really want to test it. i read a thread, saying that 'Just add +SPBR to the VO and reflash the DSC'. is this what we need when sport brakes are introduced? reagardless of types of sport brake - i know that there are several types on the sport brake in e series - adding +SPBR is the only option to have function activated? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2017, 05:15 AM | #62 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() 735
Rep 1,819
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2009 118i Monaco Blue "Maximillion"
2009 335i Saphire Black M Sport "Leopold" Cobb stage 2 aggressive tune, Mishimoto FMIC, Cobb charge pipe, Cobb catted down pipes, Forge diverter valves, BMS inlets and DCI, Cyba scoops and M Individual Audio retrofit and M3 gauge cluster retrofit. 2011 328i Titan Silver M Sport "Franzel" <--Wife's car |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2017, 08:35 AM | #63 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 480
Rep 1,600
Posts |
Ok so i finally did enough research and read enough guides to settle my nerves and harden my balls to modify the VO to delete +SPBR from my 135i.
For those wanting to code their car for sport brakes, this is what you do: **Park your car on a flat level surface** (see below for note) In NCS expert, Add "+SPBR" to your VO without the inverted commas. Write that FA to the CAS and FRM or in my case it was the NFRM. Then default code the DSC (code the DSC ECU only, rather than the whole car). Next, open INPA and do all the sensor calibrations (steering sensor, yaw sensor, acceleration sensor, and calibrate the input and output valve characteristics). The recalibrations are easier in ISTA/D because it gives you a guide on what you need to reset or do and in what order. But INPA will get the job done. Anyway, i am glad that +SPBR is no longer active on my 135i. I really dont know why the option existed in ISTA/D. - Brake response is now sharper, it delivers similar stopping power with about 10mm shorter pedal stroke. It feels like how Brembos should feel. I dare say it feels better than an M135i. - Jabbing the brake in reverse feels the same as moving forward. With +SPBR it felt like unbedded brakes in reverse - I didnt get a chance to dump the DSC's trace file to see if the default code operation undid all my previous tinkering (disable brake fade compensation, disable ready alert brake etc) - Please note that i had a shit baseline to begin with (DSC valve module issues, stuck caliper pistons and more) In short, DO NOT enable +SPBR on 135i models. I have to drive the car more to determine if my pedal inconsistency has been resolved but so far so good. Sometimes the dealer software holds you back ![]() Aside from the DSC module differences (Mk60 basic for 4cyl, Mk60E5 for 6cyl, Mk60E5 motorsport version for 8cyl models), there must be something different in the base programming that we cannot access via the commonly available software. Because if you folks with the 4cyl models get a soft pedal and weak brakes after adding the 6/2 piston 135i equivalent BBK, but get a drastic positive change after adding +SPBR, there must be more to it. Even after i played around with the pressure model settings, i couldnt get it to feel proper. The control unit has a massive influence on pedal feel and brake response on these cars. The entire experience is computer controlled and can easily mislead troubleshooting resulting in a lot of wasted time and money replacing good parts. For 7DCT models (and possibly 6AT), you MUST be parked on flat level ground before you recalibrate the yaw and acceleration sensors. If your car is pointing nose downhill when you recalibrate the sensors, the DSC will tell the transmission you are driving uphill when you are actually driving on flat level road. So it will choose a lower gear, use more fuel, make more noise etc. It will also hold gears for longer before upshifting. All models AFAIK have a hill holder function. Calibrating the sensors with the car pointing downhill creates an interesting situation. The hill holder will activate on level ground because it thinks the car is on a slope, so as you accelerate to take off there is a 2s delay and you feel the brakes suddenly release and the car takes off. It allows you to accelerate and build boost. You could use this as a sort of brake launch at traffic light grand prixs. Downside is it is very annoying in stop/go traffic. sono0312: I actually have an answer for this one. It may affect how DSC intervenes (eg how strongly it brakes a wheel to maintain intended vehicle trajectory). Adding/removing the +SPBR attribute affects mainly pedal feel and brake response via a modified pressure curve. Think of it as modifying the axes on a graph to achieve a higher pressure with less input. If you want to modify how aggressively traction control intervenes, try modifying the coding in your DSC - druckmodell/pressure model is what you are after. I discovered this by accident. Setting it to wert_01 for HA Druckmodel and VA Druckmodel resulted in less traction control sensitivity. It felt like i had an open diff despite not disabling the ediff! I dont have enough open space here to test DSC intervention so do so at your own risk. I couldnt fault it in everyday driving except it seemed too happy to spin the inside wheel merging out haha |
04-22-2017, 06:47 AM | #64 | |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
would you please let me know if the sensor caliblations are required on dsc module only? when we reprogrammed dsc by accident i made a "DSC unit adjustment" by using ista/d to eliminate the alarms. it took 5-10 minutes to complete. i understand that the caliblation is necessary if some alarms appear after flashing. because flashing is required once +SPBR added to vo. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-22-2017, 07:31 AM | #65 |
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() ![]() 480
Rep 1,600
Posts |
Yes, you calibrate them via the traction control menu in ISTA/D or DSC menu in INPA anyway. The acceleration sensor (and tilt sensor?) is inside the DSC control unit but the yaw sensor is beneath the passenger seat on a RHD car. I am not sure if they kept it under the driver seat in a LHD car. Replace either sensor and you must recalibrate the acceleration and yaw sensor.
Replace DSC control unit or complete module with pump/valve block and you have to recalibrate the valves and pump (DSC unit adjustment) in addition to recalibrating the acceleration and yaw sensors, after the module is coded to the car. This is the one you just described that took 5mins. If you are just coding (tweaking), you should be fine with just recalibrating acceleration and yaw sensors. Modify VO and i would do all the recalibrations. |
Appreciate
1
vtl1514.00 |
04-25-2017, 09:31 PM | #66 | |
Private First Class
![]() 15
Rep 147
Posts |
Quote:
thanks// |
|
Appreciate
0
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|