|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
50,000 miles, should i flush the transmission fluid?
|
|
02-16-2010, 03:12 PM | #45 | |
Banned
237
Rep 3,030
Posts |
Quote:
Turkeybaster, I saw on your informative thread (http://www.e90post.com/forums/showth...smission+fluid) that you used www.rmeuropean.com to order your Pentosin ATF 1... However, the bottles of Pentosin ATF1 that I got from a great Audi tuning shop (who had to order the bottles b/c they were out of stock), are Silver and "newer" looking than the black bottle on your website. If mine is marked as Pentosin ATF1, but does not list anywhere on the bottle that it's the equivalent to Shell M1735.4, do you think that's alright? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2010, 03:17 PM | #46 | |
Banned
75
Rep 1,543
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2010, 03:26 PM | #47 | |
king of the hills
112
Rep 2,923
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 w/ESS55, 2001 540i/6
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arvada, CO
|
Quote:
http://admin.webmakerx.net/images/Si.../autotrans.pdf Also Audi = quattro (for the most part), which can make a difference in the wear and tear on the transmission (same thing for XI) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2010, 03:41 PM | #48 |
Lieutenant General
3908
Rep 10,606
Posts |
Well that's easy being that Pentosin's web site specifically states FFL4 was formulated specifically for the Getrag DCT. Unfortunately that's not the case with the 6hp (ATF-1 is not approved use) and I want to know why.
Last edited by F32Fleet; 02-16-2010 at 04:18 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2010, 05:15 PM | #49 |
Banned
75
Rep 1,543
Posts |
Socom, and racy, whats causing your confusion might be your interpretation of the ZF documents. Did you guys notice that there are two different verisons of the TE ML11 list released by ZF? In the 2007 version--> http://www.pentosin.de/flexxtrader/d...ATF%201_GB.pdf there is no reference to what the purpose of the fluids listed is. Each required lifeguard fluid is listed in the tables only. Pentosin ATF1 is not even on the list, instead its only listed as its rebagded cousin: lifeguard5. It then mentions that as time goes on, ZF would make changes to the document. In the 2010 version of the document--> http://www01apps.zf.com/kst464/ZF_In...011_en0700.pdf You see that much has indeed changed. Firstly, in the last sentence it references the transmission in the last table, 4,5&6hp, and notes that the approved list below is for them. Here pentosin atf1 is listed, along with the LG5 rebadge. I believe that from the 2010 document, it should be clear that all the fluids in the A&B list are approved, and that they can be used as LG substitutes in their 4,5&6HP transmissions.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2010, 05:52 PM | #50 |
king of the hills
112
Rep 2,923
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 w/ESS55, 2001 540i/6
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arvada, CO
|
That's what I thought at first too...until I emailed ZF directly and asked them to clarify if LG6 was 11A or 11B, and was told that it is neither. LG6 is only listed under the TE-ML 11 document, but is neither 11A or 11B...so none in those lists apply as an approved equivalent of LG6. TE-ML 11A and 11B approvals are are only used for the 5HP18 and/or 3HP and 4HP transmissions, per what ZF indicates.
See my other post with the response from ZF. http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...2&postcount=31 So basically, just because the fluid is listed on the TE-ML 11 document, does not mean that a specific transmission can take either an 11A or 11B fluid. Note that he does say ths transmissions using 11A/B are not lifetime filled. The LG6 was developed specifically to be "lifetime", however the use of the other oils on that list *might* be fine if you are changing out regularly...but we just don't know that for sure. ZF of course would not give that answer. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2010, 05:59 PM | #51 | |
Lieutenant General
3908
Rep 10,606
Posts |
Quote:
Is this a marketing ploy by ZF? Maybe. These companies probably have special agreements with certain manufacturers. For example, I don't think you can buy, retail, Shell M-1375.4. Is it because it's just base stock and ZF requires a specific additive pkg for the LG 5/6/6+/8 ATF types?? All I know is that the more I dig the more questions I end up having. I'm really not trying to argumentitive(sp?), it's just that the pieces aren't fitting together. I suppose the million $ question to ZF would be "If I want to change my fluid every 30-50k miles, is it ok to use another fluid off your list that's not LG6?" Last edited by F32Fleet; 02-16-2010 at 08:18 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2010, 09:45 PM | #52 | |
Banned
75
Rep 1,543
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by Turkeybaster115; 02-16-2010 at 09:56 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2010, 09:52 PM | #53 | |
Banned
75
Rep 1,543
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by Turkeybaster115; 02-16-2010 at 09:58 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2010, 07:40 AM | #54 | |
Lieutenant General
3908
Rep 10,606
Posts |
Quote:
Here's a copy of an email I received from pentosin.de. Dear Mr. Xxxx, Thank you very much for your email. Referring to our below stated email we would like to inform you that we also talked internally to our head of the R&D department. Please be informed that our Pentosin ATF 1 is approved by a) VIOTH Extended Drain Intervals List of Lubricants H55.6336.3x / DIWA Service Bulletin 013 and 118 b) ZF lubricant class/es TE-ML 11B Hence our Pentosin ATF 1 meets the requirements and is suitable for 5 HP. Please be informed that there is no written confirmation for 6 HP, thus we cannot confirm it. We trust we could help you. In case of any further support, feel free to contact us at any time. Best regards from Hamburg. mit freundlichen Grüßen / kind regards Last edited by F32Fleet; 02-17-2010 at 07:53 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2010, 11:03 AM | #55 |
king of the hills
112
Rep 2,923
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 w/ESS55, 2001 540i/6
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arvada, CO
|
LOL, I just received that exact same email for my question to them too.
So basically all of the retailers saying that the Pentosin ATF-1 is equivalent to M-1375.4 are doing so on their own, with no actual proof of that from Pentosin. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2010, 11:08 AM | #56 | |||
Banned
75
Rep 1,543
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
1. don't ever change the fluid- ZF, and dealership mandate--> BASTARDS 2. Pentosin ATF1 isn't approved for use, despite, it being on the approval list. Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2010, 11:11 AM | #57 |
Banned
75
Rep 1,543
Posts |
Ok, let me get in on this act, and write both ZF, and pentosin. I will also show the latter pictures of my OEM 6hP transmission fluids from both my cars after 40K, and 50K respectively. Lets see what these ZF asshats have to say. I will also provide a copy of my e-mail letter to them, to prove, that I'm not trying to win an internet arguement.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2010, 11:17 AM | #58 | |
Lieutenant General
3908
Rep 10,606
Posts |
Quote:
I actually did. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2010, 11:19 AM | #59 | |
Lieutenant General
3908
Rep 10,606
Posts |
Quote:
Let us know what ZF and Pentosin say. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2010, 11:58 AM | #60 | |||
king of the hills
112
Rep 2,923
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 w/ESS55, 2001 540i/6
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arvada, CO
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://admin.webmakerx.net/images/Si.../autotrans.pdf It says its CBS at around 100k miles. Quote:
There are NO approvals for other fluids to work in the 6HP, so there is nothing for other fluid manufacturers to design their fluids to, like there is for the the other ZF trannys (11A / 11B, Dexron III, Mercon V, etc.) How bout an analogy with the oils...Think of the Lifeguardfluid6 as the ONLY LL-01 oil. BMW says only to use oils with LL-01 approval in the E9x. Now, oils that are approved for LL-98 (or API SM/CF, ACEA A3, B3/B4, etc.) might work, and be just fine...however they are not approved for use in this car. ONLY LL-01 is approved at this time, and that is the same with Lifeguardfluid6 in the 6HP19. Last edited by raceyBMW; 02-17-2010 at 12:05 PM.. |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2010, 06:18 PM | #61 |
Brigadier General
199
Rep 4,646
Posts |
omg Turkeybaster115, you just keep bring it around the same topic over and over.
it's not even funny how many times i come across people mentioning same links over and over again. it's like this... "i replaced my tranny fluids with Pentosin ATF. color of ZF lifetime sucks. many people used pentosin on 6hp and i'm good after 10k" "pentosin is not approved by bmw" "yes it is" "no it is not, it's not. zf guy doesn't think so" "it's on their list" "it's in zf's approved list for 5hp, but not 6hp. lg6 or bmw oil is only approved for 6hp" "what do you expect them to say? zf and bmw are greedy bastard and only idiots paying for stealership price" "uh... rep at pentosin replied the same thing as zf" "what do you expect him to say? he's only a rep. this is not the fist discussion about this there are many people using this, me being one of THEM. and for 10k i'm fine by far..." START-OVER
__________________
SGE92TT......................... 12.331 Sec @ 117.89 Mph............................POWERED BY
l BMS DCI l HELIX IC l FORGE DVs l RR OCC & CP & SCOOPS l AR 3" DPs l AE QUADs l BLISTEIN PSS10 l P3 VENT GUAGE l VISHNU PROCEDE V5 AUTOTUNE l Lots of Window Stickers |
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2010, 06:33 PM | #62 |
Brigadier General
199
Rep 4,646
Posts |
as many mentioned earlier, i have nothing against aftermarket fluids such as pentosin or RL or castrol or WHATEVER as long as it is within the spec. unlike engine oil (LL01), bmw and zf only approved LG06/OEM, nothing else is OFFICIALLY APPROVED by them, hence i sticked with OEM.
i'm actually glad and appreciate for the fact that you are trying something different but the fact that you used non-approved oil for 10k or 100k is irrelevant here. it could be good reference once more and more people use pentosin or any other aftermarket aft and be fine with it but only time will tell. even after 100k miles later, if it's not officially approved, it's not. whether people actually use and be fine with it or not is not the point. if zf or bmw makes changes that any aftermarket within spec could be used and if pentosin or any aftermarket atf that is within provided spec, then that's different story. as many mentioned already, we're trying to see what's the options and now after long discussion, i'm sure people at least now have two choices. 1) stick with zg lg6 or BMW oil and pay high price 2) experiment with aftermarket atf oil at lower cost. will oem be better than aftermarket? maybe maybe not. as some mentioned, it can not be determined by color or smell. it will requrie some lab testing. will aftermarket atf be fine? maybe maybe not. but you don't have to bash or insult on people who's trying to stick on the safeside. little side not to my OEM oil debate, part number ending 929 was actually came out to be 1/2 liter measurement for 516 and it was used for pricing purpose. nvm, please refer this --> http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=345598
__________________
SGE92TT......................... 12.331 Sec @ 117.89 Mph............................POWERED BY
l BMS DCI l HELIX IC l FORGE DVs l RR OCC & CP & SCOOPS l AR 3" DPs l AE QUADs l BLISTEIN PSS10 l P3 VENT GUAGE l VISHNU PROCEDE V5 AUTOTUNE l Lots of Window Stickers Last edited by hun77777; 02-17-2010 at 06:38 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2010, 12:30 AM | #63 |
Banned
237
Rep 3,030
Posts |
Despite going back and forth, and being 90% committed to trying out Pentosin ATF1, I contacted my BMW tech today regarding the transmission fluid change... I told him I was going to supply him with 7-8 quarts of Pentosin ATF1, and he was familiar with the product.
While he said that oil (ATF1) was acceptable as a temporary fluid that can be used in an emergency, he highly recommended against using it to drain/fill my transmission fluid. I have to say, based on that response, and his familiarity with the oil, I decided to stick w/ the OEM Shell 1375.4 (or equivalent) that they supply at the dealer. I need to get 7 quarts at $26/liter. When I go to get my transmission fluid change, I'll be sure to ask why he think the ATF1 is only acceptable as a temporary, in case of emergency, solution. Still, I have to commend Turkeybaster for his persistence and experience with Pentosin. Unfortunately for me, I'm not much of a maintenance guru, so I guess I'll have to stick w/ the recommended, OEM, stuff -- where it's difficult to find a viable solution. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2010, 11:51 AM | #64 | |
Banned
75
Rep 1,543
Posts |
Quote:
Last edited by Turkeybaster115; 02-19-2010 at 02:20 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2010, 06:23 PM | #65 |
Lieutenant General
3908
Rep 10,606
Posts |
I spoke to the Pentosin rep about their ATF1 (older German fellow).
Cliff notes: He recommended that OEM fluid be used when changing the fluid prior to 50k miles in order to preserve warranty, and their ATF1 would be fine for doing post warranty changes within resonable change intervals. Although I kick myself for not asking him if the reason why their literature states ATF1was not approved for the ZF 6HP was due to possible confusion with the "lifetime" moniker my impression is, by how this was explained to me, that was the case. His opinion was that the 6HP whould last ~200-250k miles with normal ATF changes. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2010, 07:11 PM | #66 | |
Been there, wrecked that.
18
Rep 547
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.castrol.com/liveassets/bp...s_ImportMV.pdf However, I don't see any "extended fill interval" language on their website and looking at what they consider normal fluid changes of 15K to 30K miles is rather amusing. At 15K mile change intervals, I think I could use my piss as as an effective automatic transmission fluid. It would be the cheapest price of all and a great excuse to the wife for drinking a few cases of beer.
__________________
-Brian
~199K miles. I -still- don't fear my 335i. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|