PROcede v4 AUTOTUNING Dyno Results...Must See!! Nearly 470ft/lb of Torque

Former_Boosted_IS · 08-06-2010, 05:56 AM

Great numbers and the consistency is what looks the best.

For what it is worth, hp is a good measure of how you tune is doing not torque. Torque on this car is simply a measure of how much boost you want to run down low. Most don't run a ton by choice because it just spins the tires and is worthless. I thought it would be fun to see what I could do by adding more boost down low and put down 560 rwtq. Since the turbo's rpms are so much lower down at peak torque it is much safer on your turbos than higher boost at high rpms. I am sure someone could break 500 rwtq if they just go with 18 psi down low, but it would be worthless.

dzenno · 08-06-2010, 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Former_Boosted_IS

Great numbers and the consistency is what looks the best.

For what it is worth, hp is a good measure of how you tune is doing not torque. Torque on this car is simply a measure of how much boost you want to run down low. Most don't run a ton by choice because it just spins the tires and is worthless. I thought it would be fun to see what I could do by adding more boost down low and put down 560 rwtq. Since the turbo's rpms are so much lower down at peak torque it is much safer on your turbos than higher boost at high rpms. I am sure someone could break 500 rwtq if they just go with 18 psi down low, but it would be worthless.

+1 on worthless torque...as an added bonus you'd most likely break a few halfshafts along the way...but with an LSD it wouldn't be that worthless at all actually...

alextremo · 08-06-2010, 06:36 AM

Nice. I didn't see it mentioned - is this with stock air box?

Dr G13 · 08-06-2010, 08:11 AM

WOW, are those number at the wheel or fly? If thats at the wheel torque, thats almost double the stock cars flywheel torque (factory numbers).

If it is at the wheels, how is the drivetrain coping with almost 100% more tq?

Sorry for the noob questions

blubyu · 08-06-2010, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr G13

WOW, are those number at the wheel or fly? If thats at the wheel torque, thats almost double the stock cars flywheel torque (factory numbers).

If it is at the wheels, how is the drivetrain coping with almost 100% more tq?

Sorry for the noob questions

Dynojet = hp/tq at the tires.

atlxkevinx · 08-06-2010, 09:16 AM

Wow, great numbers! What a beast..

stressdoc · 08-06-2010, 12:00 PM

+1 on a test w/ 93 octane.
Great job!

airwolf878 · 08-06-2010, 12:02 PM

Wow

I think you owe me a ride at our next meet!

Sniz · 08-06-2010, 12:11 PM

yes those are some sick sick numbers

put in some meth and run it w/ 93 octane and you'll be able to enjoy those numbers literally every day.

bravo.

BrianMN · 08-06-2010, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dzenno

+1 on worthless torque...as an added bonus you'd most likely break a few halfshafts along the way...but with an LSD it wouldn't be that worthless at all actually...

I'm not sure how I feel about saying a lot of torque is worthless. Actually I think it's great how much power is available below 5k...as most people would rarely go over 5k in a 'daily drive'

However I understand what FBIS is saying about HP being a good measure.

AltecBX · 08-06-2010, 01:17 PM

Why is the Procede line flatter than the JB3?

blubyu · 08-06-2010, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianMN

I'm not sure how I feel about saying a lot of torque is worthless. Actually I think it's great how much power is available below 5k...as most people would rarely go over 5k in a 'daily drive'

However I understand what FBIS is saying about HP being a good measure.

I just shake my head when I hear the worthless torque term used. I guess most of these guys haven't driven a really high powered car with loads of low end torque. They are the most fun by far and all you need is a little tire on the rear to hook it up decent. I don't see axels being an issue at these power levels unless it a 6 speed launching high on a sticky tire or severe wheel hop.

nood1es · 08-06-2010, 02:27 PM

Dynojet?

Mike@N54Tuning.com · 08-06-2010, 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AltecBX

Why is the Procede line flatter than the JB3?

You mean why is he comparing JB3 (version 1.3 or 1.4?) map 7 on 93 octane @ 15psi to his latest V4 on 100 octane @ 19-20psi? It makes no sense to me so I can't answer that. But the older JB3 93 octane results look great and the new V4 results look great as well.

Mike

blubyu · 08-06-2010, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike@N54Tuning.com

You mean why is he comparing JB3 (version 1.3 or 1.4?) map 7 on 93 octane @ 15psi to his latest V4 on 100 octane @ 19-20psi? It makes no sense to me so I can't answer that. But the older JB3 93 octane results look great and the new V4 results look great as well.

Mike

By flatter I think he meant smoother.

BrianMN · 08-06-2010, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike@N54Tuning.com

You mean why is he comparing JB3 (version 1.3 or 1.4?) map 7 on 93 octane @ 15psi to his latest V4 on 100 octane @ 19-20psi? It makes no sense to me so I can't answer that. But the older JB3 93 octane results look great and the new V4 results look great as well.

Mike

Come on... you, and everyone (with half a brain) knows that this is absolutely not a comparison thread. If it were, I would have stated so in the title or somewhere in the post. I clearly state in original post that important variables have changed...such as fuel and subsequently boost.

That's probably why it has gone 3 pages without being accused of being a comparison.

Those are good numbers for JB3 on Map 7...thus why I left them on..perhaps I should have posted ONLY procede results.

FWIW, It was on 2.0 in March

Mike@N54Tuning.com · 08-06-2010, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianMN

Come on... you, and everyone (with half a brain) knows that this is absolutely not a comparison thread. If it were, I would have stated so in the title or somewhere in the post. I clearly state in original post that important variables have changed...such as fuel and subsequently boost.

That's probably why it has gone 3 pages without being accused of being a comparison.

Those are good numbers for JB3 on Map 7...thus why I left them on..perhaps I should have posted ONLY procede results.

FWIW, It was on 2.0 in March

Both your dynos are great. Your car must be a blast to drive

Off topic a little but what tires are you running now? I am in the market for new rubber. (Sending you a PM)

Mike

BrianMN · 08-06-2010, 03:33 PM

PM Replied..Nitto all the way!

08-06-2010, 05:56 AM	#45
Former_Boosted_IS Major General 330 Rep 5,175 Posts Drives: 4 Wheels Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Planet Earth! iTrader: (15)	Great numbers and the consistency is what looks the best. For what it is worth, hp is a good measure of how you tune is doing not torque. Torque on this car is simply a measure of how much boost you want to run down low. Most don't run a ton by choice because it just spins the tires and is worthless. I thought it would be fun to see what I could do by adding more boost down low and put down 560 rwtq. Since the turbo's rpms are so much lower down at peak torque it is much safer on your turbos than higher boost at high rpms. I am sure someone could break 500 rwtq if they just go with 18 psi down low, but it would be worthless.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-06-2010, 06:36 AM	#47
alextremo Captain 52 Rep 966 Posts Drives: F10 550i Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA iTrader: (5)	Nice. I didn't see it mentioned - is this with stock air box?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-06-2010, 08:11 AM	#48
Dr G13 Lieutenant 35 Rep 445 Posts Drives: 3 Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: uk iTrader: (0)	WOW, are those number at the wheel or fly? If thats at the wheel torque, thats almost double the stock cars flywheel torque (factory numbers). If it is at the wheels, how is the drivetrain coping with almost 100% more tq? Sorry for the noob questions
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-06-2010, 09:16 AM	#50
atlxkevinx Never 2econd 35 Rep 853 Posts Drives: BMW E92 335i Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Atlanta, GA iTrader: (8)	Wow, great numbers! What a beast.. __________________ 2007 E92 335i Coupe \| Space Gray \| Coral Red \| Sport \| Cold Weather \| Navi \| iDrive \| Logic7
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-06-2010, 12:00 PM	#51
stressdoc Moderator 670 Rep 10,866 Posts Drives: BMW i8; Toy 4runner TRD pro Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Waco TX iTrader: (0)	+1 on a test w/ 93 octane. Great job! __________________ My recent ED photos: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1026808 my not-so-recent ED: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31829 Please join BMWCCA http://bmwcca.org/index.php?pageid=c...&ref_by=300279
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-06-2010, 12:02 PM	#52
airwolf878 First Lieutenant 17 Rep 329 Posts Drives: 2014 435i Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Minneapolis iTrader: (1)	Wow I think you owe me a ride at our next meet!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-06-2010, 12:11 PM	#53
Sniz Lieutenant General 715 Rep 10,584 Posts Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Ellicott City, MD iTrader: (1)	yes those are some sick sick numbers put in some meth and run it w/ 93 octane and you'll be able to enjoy those numbers literally every day. bravo. __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-06-2010, 01:17 PM	#55
AltecBX Colonel 350 Rep 2,663 Posts Drives: BMW 335xi Sedan; BMW M3 ZCP Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: NYC iTrader: (0) Garage List 2018 BMW M3 ZCP [0.00] 2007 BMW 335Xi [0.00]	Why is the Procede line flatter than the JB3? __________________ 335xi Sedan 6AT \| Weather(70-85°F) \| N54 Tune Comparison Chart \|\| N54 Turbo Upgrade Comparison Chart -PROcede Rev. 2.5 ~ v5 (3/17 maps) / JB4 (8/21 maps) / COBB (Stg2+FMIC LT Aggressive maps) †Procede Map2(UT 45 - IGN 40) Aggression Target 2.0 \| 0-60 in 4.0sec \|\| †Cobb E30 LT (35% Ethanol/65% 93 Octane) \| 0-60 in 3.9sec AR Design Catless DP \| BMS DCI + OCC \| ETS 5 FMIC \| Alpina B3 Trans Flash \|235/265 19" Michelin PSS
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-06-2010, 02:27 PM	#57
nood1es Captain 31 Rep 673 Posts Drives: E70 Join Date: May 2007 Location: Madison, WI iTrader: (10)	Dynojet?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

08-06-2010, 03:33 PM	#62
BrianMN Banned 128 Rep 2,428 Posts Drives: 4 Door Family Sedan Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Minneapolis iTrader: (7)	PM Replied..Nitto all the way!
	Appreciate 0 Quote