|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
VRSF exhaust = restrictive/downgrade according to shop?
|
|
08-13-2013, 06:42 PM | #47 |
Major
149
Rep 1,100
Posts |
Any sound clips of the v2 with stock downpipes? I'm very interested but i'm not sure how it will sound....
__________________
2010 335i Coupe- Monaco Blue Metallic
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2013, 07:40 PM | #49 |
New Member
0
Rep 11
Posts |
So no one has a dyno of the VRSF exhaust vs stock? I really like the idea of this exhaust with the huge weight savings and simplification of one large pipe, but if there isnt any performance gains over stock I dont want to throw money away. Yes I know most of the gains from an exhaust come from removing the secondary cats, regardless of brand, but if the muffler on the VRSF is restrictive enough to cancel out those gains then why bother. Judging by sound alone, it is definately quieter than other exhaust, even with catless DP's, which leads me to believe its more restrictive.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-19-2013, 08:50 PM | #51 | |
Colonel
229
Rep 2,387
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 12:03 AM | #52 | |
Private First Class
3
Rep 106
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 02:21 AM | #53 |
Major
267
Rep 1,392
Posts |
No back pressure /restricted exhaust problems here
__________________
Have a single turbo and/or tired of burning up O2 sensors? Ask me about the new ADV O2 sensor retro kits!
335i 2010 e92 M-sport Mods: VM Top mount 6466, Aquamist HSF4 w/custom direct port. VRSF IC + Exhaust 335i 2009 e90 665RWHP VFF900 ST RIP . |
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 09:06 AM | #55 |
New Member
0
Rep 11
Posts |
I wasnt saying it is more restrictive, just based on sound alone I was thinking it might be more restrictive than other aftermarket options. Like I said the VRSF is #1 on my list of options, I just like getting all the data I can before making a final decision.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 09:07 AM | #56 |
New Member
0
Rep 11
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 05:13 PM | #57 | |
Private First Class
20
Rep 144
Posts |
Quote:
As I recall, the rule of thumb is that the flow rate is proportional to the cube of the radius of the pipe, so the 3.5" pipe would flow about 35% more than the 2 x 2.5" diameter pipes given the same boundary conditions. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-20-2013, 11:51 PM | #58 |
Private First Class
36
Rep 130
Posts |
I am pretty sure the VRSF catback mirrors the AMS exhaust. Would you be saying this about AMS? BTW I dont have either but I know that a lot of "shops" are complete clowns when it comes to their opinions on things like this. I dont know if VRSF is the best, but from looking at it, its definitely an improvement over stock.
__________________
2016 BMW M3 Comp
2019 BMW X5 50i |
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|