E90Post
 


 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > VRSF exhaust = restrictive/downgrade according to shop?



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-13-2013, 06:33 PM   #45
jblough99
New Member
0
Rep
11
Posts

Drives: 2008 335I E92
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Johnstown, PA

iTrader: (0)

Thats what I was hoping for. Does the piping drop back down to 2.5" inside the muffler for each side?
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 06:37 PM   #46
Tiago@VRSF
Tiago@VRSF's Avatar
United_States
2108
Rep
43,350
Posts

Drives: F90 M5
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Doral, FL

iTrader: (99)

Garage List
Drops down to 2.75" on each side.
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 06:42 PM   #47
1chanc3
Major
149
Rep
1,100
Posts

Drives: 2010 e92 335i
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA

iTrader: (0)

Any sound clips of the v2 with stock downpipes? I'm very interested but i'm not sure how it will sound....
__________________
2010 335i Coupe- Monaco Blue Metallic
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 06:46 PM   #48
jblough99
New Member
0
Rep
11
Posts

Drives: 2008 335I E92
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Johnstown, PA

iTrader: (0)

Any dyno charts with before and after exhaust? If not do you any numbers for gains with your system over stock exhaust on a tuned car?
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 07:40 PM   #49
jblough99
New Member
0
Rep
11
Posts

Drives: 2008 335I E92
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Johnstown, PA

iTrader: (0)

So no one has a dyno of the VRSF exhaust vs stock? I really like the idea of this exhaust with the huge weight savings and simplification of one large pipe, but if there isnt any performance gains over stock I dont want to throw money away. Yes I know most of the gains from an exhaust come from removing the secondary cats, regardless of brand, but if the muffler on the VRSF is restrictive enough to cancel out those gains then why bother. Judging by sound alone, it is definately quieter than other exhaust, even with catless DP's, which leads me to believe its more restrictive.
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 08:18 PM   #50
Tiago@VRSF
Tiago@VRSF's Avatar
United_States
2108
Rep
43,350
Posts

Drives: F90 M5
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Doral, FL

iTrader: (99)

Garage List
So it's quite a few DB louder than the stock exhaust with no internal baffling, unlike the stock exhaust. How does that make it more restrictive?
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 08:50 PM   #51
ajsalida
Colonel
ajsalida's Avatar
229
Rep
2,387
Posts

Drives: 95 M3, 02 R1150GSA, 09 335xi
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SW USA

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jblough99 View Post
So no one has a dyno of the VRSF exhaust vs stock? I really like the idea of this exhaust with the huge weight savings and simplification of one large pipe, but if there isnt any performance gains over stock I dont want to throw money away. Yes I know most of the gains from an exhaust come from removing the secondary cats, regardless of brand, but if the muffler on the VRSF is restrictive enough to cancel out those gains then why bother. Judging by sound alone, it is definately quieter than other exhaust, even with catless DP's, which leads me to believe its more restrictive.
Quiet is an acoustic phenomenon, not related to flow. Plenty of really loud exhausts flow poorly. A single pipe on a N54 will mix the acoustics up of the two banks, with a lot of cancellation. That is why they are quieter than other catless duals. Eliminating the secondary cats and having a combined cross sectional area equal or greater than stock will make it flow better.
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2013, 12:03 AM   #52
danielg69
Private First Class
3
Rep
106
Posts

Drives: 335i
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajsalida View Post
Quiet is an acoustic phenomenon, not related to flow. Plenty of really loud exhausts flow poorly. A single pipe on a N54 will mix the acoustics up of the two banks, with a lot of cancellation. That is why they are quieter than other catless duals. Eliminating the secondary cats and having a combined cross sectional area equal or greater than stock will make it flow better.
Yes I agree. Although I have never owned a VSRF product I would be hard pressed to believe it is more restrictive. Here's a good video of a tiny exhaust that is well, quite loud.

Appreciate 0
      08-20-2013, 02:21 AM   #53
3000GT MR
Major
3000GT MR's Avatar
United_States
267
Rep
1,392
Posts

Drives: 09 335i/3000gt vr4
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sav GA

iTrader: (6)

No back pressure /restricted exhaust problems here
__________________
Have a single turbo and/or tired of burning up O2 sensors? Ask me about the new ADV O2 sensor retro kits!
335i 2010 e92 M-sport Mods: VM Top mount 6466, Aquamist HSF4 w/custom direct port. VRSF IC + Exhaust
335i 2009 e90 665RWHP VFF900 ST RIP .
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2013, 02:59 AM   #54
gunda
Lieutenant
Canada
49
Rep
465
Posts

Drives: 2008 BMW 335i e92
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mississauga

iTrader: (0)

there appears to be something attached to the end of that exhaust :s lol
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2013, 09:06 AM   #55
jblough99
New Member
0
Rep
11
Posts

Drives: 2008 335I E92
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Johnstown, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiago@VRSF View Post
So it's quite a few DB louder than the stock exhaust with no internal baffling, unlike the stock exhaust. How does that make it more restrictive?
I wasnt saying it is more restrictive, just based on sound alone I was thinking it might be more restrictive than other aftermarket options. Like I said the VRSF is #1 on my list of options, I just like getting all the data I can before making a final decision.
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2013, 09:07 AM   #56
jblough99
New Member
0
Rep
11
Posts

Drives: 2008 335I E92
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Johnstown, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3000GT MR View Post
No back pressure /restricted exhaust problems here
The fact that your running this exhaust with a big single turbo, it sets my mind at ease about its ability to flow
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2013, 05:13 PM   #57
bantam
Private First Class
20
Rep
144
Posts

Drives: 2009 335i
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. G View Post
Two perfectly straight 2.5" pipes technically flow a bit better than a single perfectly straight 3.5" pipe of the same length.
This is likely incorrect. While the two 2.5" pipes have a slightly greater cross-sectional area, you have ignored the frictional effects present within the pipe.

As I recall, the rule of thumb is that the flow rate is proportional to the cube of the radius of the pipe, so the 3.5" pipe would flow about 35% more than the 2 x 2.5" diameter pipes given the same boundary conditions.
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2013, 11:51 PM   #58
Electric
Private First Class
United_States
36
Rep
130
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW M3 Competition
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NJ

iTrader: (0)

I am pretty sure the VRSF catback mirrors the AMS exhaust. Would you be saying this about AMS? BTW I dont have either but I know that a lot of "shops" are complete clowns when it comes to their opinions on things like this. I dont know if VRSF is the best, but from looking at it, its definitely an improvement over stock.
__________________
2016 BMW M3 Comp
2019 BMW X5 50i
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST