[NYCGarbagePrince]

Not the same map that you ran on the track? or was that just 100% across the board.

[B00sted335BMW]

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

Actually no. I'm running the same v2.0.2 map that is on the website. Everything explained here: http://www.e90post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=100073


shiv

The KEY WORD is HAD, in my post I am assuming you are not running the same map and levels when you DYNOed over 400whp, if you were then everyone running a V2.02 with an exhaust would and should be running very close to 400+whp.................ahh but they aren't, dont try and feed us BS...............

[e90AW335i]

Originally Posted by *****ed335BMW

dont try and feed us BS...............

[OpenFlash]

Originally Posted by *****ed335BMW

The KEY WORD is HAD, in my post I am assuming you are not running the same map and levels when you DYNOed over 400whp, if you were then everyone running a V2.02 with an exhaust would and should be running very close to 400+whp.................ahh but they aren't, dont try and feed us BS...............

What BS are you talking about? The only thing i claimed (which is true) is that I am (and was) running the standard v2.0.2 map when i did the dyno testing illustrated in that thread. At 100%, running 100oct, that map will max out at ~400whp.

The map i used to make 417whp a while back was very similar to v2.0.2. Only real change was that it was scaled to allow 1psi more boost when set to 100%. This is the map I ran 116.8 trap speeds with. I don't understand why you guys try to create drama when there is none to be created. Sheesh.

Shiv

[stillclaimndp]

Originally Posted by *****ed335BMW

The KEY WORD is HAD, in my post I am assuming you are not running the same map and levels when you DYNOed over 400whp, if you were then everyone running a V2.02 with an exhaust would and should be running very close to 400+whp.................ahh but they aren't, dont try and feed us BS...............

in his post he hits like 356whp on 91 using the map we all run, the 400+ was on 98 octane...

[B00sted335BMW]

Originally Posted by stillclaimndp

in his post he hits like 356whp on 91 using the map we all run, the 400+ was on 98 octane...

He just admitted he used a different map when hitting the 417whp dyno

[verboten]

Originally Posted by down4it

i have i picked up 30whp and 65lb-tq to the wheels with some bolt-ons... I think its good but i think it will be better when i get a map made for the mods i have and then see if i can dyno again with values at 98-100% on 100oct straight and see what happens!

Congrats Down4it, and a perfect kind of cold Turbo Day for dyno runs
Who's CAI did you say that you were running ?? Bring that beast to Willow Springs Jan.24/25, along with our P- cars and I'll make sure that you get some good (DE) track time with an instructor
Marty

[NYCGarbagePrince]

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

What BS are you talking about? The only thing i claimed (which is true) is that I am (and was) running the standard v2.0.2 map when i did the dyno testing illustrated in that thread. At 100%, running 100oct, that map will max out at ~400whp.

The map i used to make 417whp a while back was very similar to v2.0.2. Only real change was that it was scaled to allow 1psi more boost when set to 100%. This is the map I ran 116.8 trap speeds with. I don't understand why you guys try to create drama when there is none to be created. Sheesh.

Shiv

No drama.. I would love to pick your brain about your opinion on what more could be pulled from the stock internals in the short term on certain tunes. Like VIP's tune on the Xede is seriously different than the one that is released by AA. Much like you wouldn't release a map to the public that would put unnecessary stress on peoples internals knowing they might use it for a prolonged period of time. Which is without a doubt the right thing to do. Would you agree it isn't a good idea to run that 116.8mph map around everywhere everyday? or provide it to your users without warning them before hand? I mean these are great strides in showing what these cars are capable of. Some are interested in running their cars around safely with the same tune everyday. And there are others that are interested in pushing the limits. So in truth, i commend all of those on this board, including yourself and all those at vishnu, for showing the world that these cars will be a force to be reckoned with now and even more so in the future.

[BoLaS]

GREAT job down4it!!!

I wonder how much power your new intake made!?

[down4it]

Originally Posted by E90ice

How did you gain that when you are posting similar numbers to Shiv's car than only has a cat-back?
Not flaming...just curious...

The things you have to look at is one, i cant run the TQ values up to 100%, im at 94% and im not on 98oct more like 94... I think that because of all the mods i have the 2.0.2 map isnt working as well as it can be on my car because it was made on a car with stock intake, intercooler, and downpipes... Im pretty sure that after a map is made that makes it so i can safely run 100% values and 100oct straight, there will be a nice bump in the HP when i get back on the dyno... For now im still enjoying 367whp and 441wtq

[down4it]

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

Before you do anything to the User TQ figures, run a datalog (3rd gear 2000rpm to 7000rpm) and post the graphs up. Hard to know what changes to make unless we know our starting point.

shiv

Hi Shiv,

I emailed you 2 logs, one in second and the other in 3rd gear... Any feedback would be appreciated

[OpenFlash]

Originally Posted by down4it

Hi Shiv,

I emailed you 2 logs, one in second and the other in 3rd gear... Any feedback would be appreciated

Already responded

shiv

[McLuVan]

wth....
wow
it must be like sex on wheels