E90Post
 


Extreme Powerhouse
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > Im Loving My V2 Dynos compared with M&M



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-21-2008, 03:23 PM   #67
Lane
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep
778
Posts

Drives: N54s
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK DE GR SW

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M View Post
I have an OBD-II scanner and I can monitor IAT's and its cooler with the cones than stock.
Cool! By how much?

Btw.
Please run some before/after tests if you ever decide to get an IC.
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 03:24 PM   #68
M&M
Captain
M&M's Avatar
South Africa
114
Rep
750
Posts

Drives: Boosted Beemers!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by O-cha View Post
Really? Then that IS impressive. But I'm more than a bit skeptical that dual cone filters in the middle of the engine bay are cooler then stock. When did you make these measurements?
I made the meeasurements on the week-end when I was logging data. Unfortunately I didn't log the IAT's as I was monitoring too many things at the time. But I can do some logs and make some graphs to see. It gets much cooler than stock at super-high speeds. I went to speed governor (155mph) a few times and I was watching the monitor and it really stays cooler after 120. Maybe there is air coming in from somewhere at those speeds. I don't know. But it's certainly not hotter than stock once in motion.
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 03:26 PM   #69
Lane
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep
778
Posts

Drives: N54s
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK DE GR SW

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThomasMartin View Post
He has multiple runs averaging 217kw - 222kw on the same dyno with the only mod added being the dual cones his first dyno hit 234kw I saw the proof if you guys dont wanna do it cool but im going tomorrow morning first thing to buy mine
M&M has the pre and post dynos, which is very nice.
Btw. I was talking about Deck, you about M&M, I guess..
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 03:26 PM   #70
ThomasMartin
First Lieutenant
29
Rep
321
Posts

Drives: BMW 335i Coupe
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Africa

iTrader: (0)

Well guys my dyno is the perfect base line to compare, im going to buy the cones tomorrow and than ill dyno and compare numbers to standard intake all dynos will be done with the hood closed
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 03:27 PM   #71
ThomasMartin
First Lieutenant
29
Rep
321
Posts

Drives: BMW 335i Coupe
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Africa

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lane View Post
M&M has the pre and post dynos, which is very nice.
Btw. I was talking about Deck, you about M&M, I guess..
ok sorry
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 03:28 PM   #72
O-cha
Brigadier General
O-cha's Avatar
232
Rep
4,726
Posts

Drives: Mcoupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In front of you

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by stillclaimndp View Post
Nice, which dyno and what mods will you be running?
A dynojet, V2 + painted reflectors . It's going to be a baseline for DP+exhaust that comes next month. If I can find stuff locally I'll test this intake after the baseline. It's going to be hard to do empirically though, even if I do the best I can think which is to drive around like a mad man and pull right onto the dyno with the stock box run, then rip it off fast and put the dual cone on, there will still be adaption and such getting in the way of solid results.


M&M these IATs are charge air temps right? I'm talking about pre turbo temps, believe it or not it does make an important difference, maybe not so much on final HP, but on overall stress.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 03:29 PM   #73
Lane
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep
778
Posts

Drives: N54s
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK DE GR SW

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M View Post
I made the meeasurements on the week-end when I was logging data. Unfortunately I didn't log the IAT's as I was monitoring too many things at the time. But I can do some logs and make some graphs to see. It gets much cooler than stock at super-high speeds. I went to speed governor (155mph) a few times and I was watching the monitor and it really stays cooler after 120. Maybe there is air coming in from somewhere at those speeds. I don't know. But it's certainly not hotter than stock once in motion.
Ok, that's all nice, but how about in somewhat more typical speeds?
Driving in the city and stopping for the red lights every now and then might not get you to be the quickest from the lights
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 03:37 PM   #74
M&M
Captain
M&M's Avatar
South Africa
114
Rep
750
Posts

Drives: Boosted Beemers!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lane View Post
Ok, that's all nice, but how about in somewhat more typical speeds?
Driving in the city and stopping for the red lights every now and then might not get you to be the quickest from the lights
Yeah at normal speeds (up to 100mph) it isn't much cooler. Can't say its really hotter either. I mean your turbos suck from the intake and then it goes through the intercooler anyway. So if its a few deg hotter does it really matter? Its gonna' get cooled anyway. I can't believe that travelling at 80mph, the air is trapped there. Here's some pics BTW, this is a copy of the Terry Ghetto intake, which I guess is a copy of Shiv's prototype intake. Note the stock duct from the grille leading directly onto the cones. I'm not finished yet, I will add another pipe from behind the left hand side brake duct and channel cold air to the centre of the cones with that as well.


Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 03:53 PM   #75
per
Lieutenant
50
Rep
512
Posts

Drives: M4 G82
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sweden Gothenburg

iTrader: (0)

[QUOTE=M&M;2007049]Yeah at normal speeds (up to 100mph) it isn't much cooler. Can't say its really hotter either. I mean your turbos suck from the intake and then it goes through the intercooler anyway. So if its a few deg hotter does it really matter? Its gonna' get cooled anyway. I can't believe that travelling at 80mph, the air is trapped there. Here's some pics BTW, this is a copy of the Terry Ghetto intake, which I guess is a copy of Shiv's prototype intake. Note the stock duct from the grille leading directly onto the cones. I'm not finished yet, I will add another pipe from behind the left hand side brake duct and channel cold air to the centre of the cones with that as well.

Hi ,i am planning to do something similar, will you take the cold air from the inside of th e wheelhouse as vip is doing, or have you found another place?
__________________
M4 G82
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 04:33 PM   #76
bmwzimmer
Major
bmwzimmer's Avatar
41
Rep
1,084
Posts

Drives: 335
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 91 octane states

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M View Post
Yeah at normal speeds (up to 100mph) it isn't much cooler. Can't say its really hotter either. I mean your turbos suck from the intake and then it goes through the intercooler anyway. So if its a few deg hotter does it really matter? Its gonna' get cooled anyway. I can't believe that travelling at 80mph, the air is trapped there. Here's some pics BTW, this is a copy of the Terry Ghetto intake, which I guess is a copy of Shiv's prototype intake. Note the stock duct from the grille leading directly onto the cones. I'm not finished yet, I will add another pipe from behind the left hand side brake duct and channel cold air to the centre of the cones with that as well.


WOW, did you pit that together yourself? Was it difficult? You should post a DIY if it provides 20-25hp to the V2.
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 06:12 PM   #77
A418t81
Lieutenant Colonel
379
Rep
1,535
Posts

Drives: Ever changing fleet
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2013 335is  [0.00]
O-cha, where did you find that gif in your sig man?
__________________
23 IOMG G80 CX, 23 iX M60, 24 GT3RS PTS Weissach, 24 RS E-tron GT

Last edited by A418t81; 01-21-2008 at 09:58 PM..
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 06:14 PM   #78
O-cha
Brigadier General
O-cha's Avatar
232
Rep
4,726
Posts

Drives: Mcoupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In front of you

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by A418t81 View Post
O-cha, where did you find that gif if you sig man?
Made it.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 06:16 PM   #79
OpenFlash
United_States
1809
Rep
17,960
Posts

Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by grkm3 View Post
yea but these are still numbers that the original xede could of done,or even a procede.The v2 was supposed to break 400whp and now Shiv has a dyno of a car on 91 oct making 390whp.Why do I have the feeling that no regular customer will ever reproduce those numbers on his car?Its a hype dyno run just like the ones he did back in the day with the xede.He has made this power with the exede and with procede and v2 was supposed to break 400.

So with what you saying is that with an aa exede and and intake we can make 370whp?or even with a juice box?we already know the intakes make power up top,people bought the v2s to make that power with no other mods.
I'm sorry but I haven't even seen this kind of dyno before. Let alone dyno'd a 335 on one, at 5500' altitude. Have you? I suspect not. So how can u be so sure that an Xede or v1 can make the same power? I don't understand why you are expressing yourself with such vehemence when you are so plainly wrong with your conclusions.

FWIW, a car running at 5500' will be very close to the limits of its turbo capacity. What this means is that v2 will not be worth as much (over v1) as it is on a car running closer to sea level. This is not hard to understand. If you want, I can explain in greater depth. Seriously, I will. Just let me know.

Shiv

Last edited by OpenFlash; 01-22-2008 at 01:21 PM.. Reason: meant to say feet, not RPM :)
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 09:58 PM   #80
A418t81
Lieutenant Colonel
379
Rep
1,535
Posts

Drives: Ever changing fleet
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2013 335is  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-cha View Post
Made it.
Ok, better question is where did you find the engine dyno vid and do you have a link?
__________________
23 IOMG G80 CX, 23 iX M60, 24 GT3RS PTS Weissach, 24 RS E-tron GT
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 10:09 PM   #81
O-cha
Brigadier General
O-cha's Avatar
232
Rep
4,726
Posts

Drives: Mcoupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In front of you

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by A418t81 View Post
Ok, better question is where did you find the engine dyno vid and do you have a link?
I took it while we had the engine on the dyno for analysis.





Stole it from here
__________________
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 10:09 PM   #82
WilyB
Captain
WilyB's Avatar
19
Rep
671
Posts

Drives: E92 335
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
If you want, I can explain in greater depth. Seriously, I will. Just let me know.

Shiv
Wow, that was some serious spanking here! I would love to read your explanations, as I learned a lot reading your posts over the past year. But, truth be told, I would love even more you using that time to create a PROcede for the Porsche 955 TT!
Appreciate 0
      01-21-2008, 10:34 PM   #83
A418t81
Lieutenant Colonel
379
Rep
1,535
Posts

Drives: Ever changing fleet
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2013 335is  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-cha View Post
I took it while we had the engine on the dyno for analysis.
Cool, thanks man
__________________
23 IOMG G80 CX, 23 iX M60, 24 GT3RS PTS Weissach, 24 RS E-tron GT
Appreciate 0
      01-22-2008, 06:46 AM   #84
Serjames
Colonel
Serjames's Avatar
United Kingdom
131
Rep
2,426
Posts

Drives: E93 335i M-sport
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Surrey - UK

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-cha View Post
I took it while we had the engine on the dyno for analysis.





Stole it from here
o-cha, would be very interested to read your finding following the engine dyno run.

What was the output? How does it equate to the power loss figures that are bandied about, i.e. 12.8% for the manuals and 15% for the Autos.

Looks like a fascinating session.

SJ
__________________
Appreciate 0
      01-22-2008, 09:54 AM   #85
midlife
ocasionally in crisis
midlife's Avatar
54
Rep
2,358
Posts

Drives: '08 335i cabrio
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ..........

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
FWIW, a car running at 5500rpm will be very close to the limits of its turbo capacity. What this means is that v2 will not be worth as much (over v1) as it is on a car running closer to sea level. This is not hard to understand. If you want, I can explain in greater depth. Seriously, I will. Just let me know.

Shiv
subscribed
__________________
If your car isn't scary - it's just not fast enough !
RPI IC / UR catless DPs / JB3 2.0 beta / UR CAI / Quaife LSD / Snow Methanol Injection / VK oil cooler upgrade / Forge DVs /
M3 rear sway / Riss catch can / Paddle shifting 6AT / M Sport steering wheel / Logic 7 / Dunlop Direzza Z1 255/235 /
Appreciate 0
      01-22-2008, 10:29 AM   #86
Sniz
Lieutenant General
Sniz's Avatar
682
Rep
10,584
Posts

Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
FWIW, a car running at 5500rpm will be very close to the limits of its turbo capacity. What this means is that v2 will not be worth as much (over v1) as it is on a car running closer to sea level. This is not hard to understand. If you want, I can explain in greater depth. Seriously, I will. Just let me know.

Shiv
Shiv,
I'm assuming you meant 5500 ft above sea level, not rpms?


To the OP, good numbers! I made 346 or 349whp (forget) on the original stock air filter w/ 21k miles on it w NO FAN on a dynojet......so the power is there. Surprising thing was after 3 runs the oil temp didnt get that high, 240ish w/ no air flow. I guess a few more runs would have cooked it a bit more. Stupid I know, but I was in a hurry.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      01-22-2008, 11:17 AM   #87
M&M
Captain
M&M's Avatar
South Africa
114
Rep
750
Posts

Drives: Boosted Beemers!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

iTrader: (0)

I logged some IATS during a 10 minute period of peak hour traffic. Mostly sitting at the lights and idling. The ambient today was 22 deg Celcius. The car idles about 8 deg above ambient. It did creep up 5 degrees during the normal traffic routine, but it did the same with the stock airbox.

I will do some load testing at speeds when I get a chance but I know what will be good. The idling test is the best one for testing the cones. Reason being that at low or idling speed there is no airflow over the intercooler. So the IAT reading is basically the same as the temp pre-intercooler. Once you get up to speed the intercooler starts operating efficiently and the hot air is going to get cooled anyway. So testing at idle is effectively testing the temps of the air coming from the cones.

Appreciate 0
      01-22-2008, 01:50 PM   #88
O-cha
Brigadier General
O-cha's Avatar
232
Rep
4,726
Posts

Drives: Mcoupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In front of you

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Serjames View Post
o-cha, would be very interested to read your finding following the engine dyno run.

What was the output? How does it equate to the power loss figures that are bandied about, i.e. 12.8% for the manuals and 15% for the Autos.

Looks like a fascinating session.

SJ

Keep starring at the post and all will become clear I actually think A4 might have missed the joke too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by M&M View Post
I logged some IATS during a 10 minute period of peak hour traffic. Mostly sitting at the lights and idling. The ambient today was 22 deg Celcius. The car idles about 8 deg above ambient. It did creep up 5 degrees during the normal traffic routine, but it did the same with the stock airbox.

I will do some load testing at speeds when I get a chance but I know what will be good. The idling test is the best one for testing the cones. Reason being that at low or idling speed there is no airflow over the intercooler. So the IAT reading is basically the same as the temp pre-intercooler. Once you get up to speed the intercooler starts operating efficiently and the hot air is going to get cooled anyway. So testing at idle is effectively testing the temps of the air coming from the cones.

Like I said in that "other" forum. 8 celsius (about 50 F) over a cold ambient is pretty high, can't really make any conclusions with other similar data to compare it to. But if it were 8 degrees over these ambients http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...6&postcount=19
you would be running hotter at idle then WOT.

Yea you can't really compare the two, nor should you really compare the post IC temps unless your goal is final HP. If it is your golden. If your worried about your turbos your some other color then golden.


I'll test it out though with a temp probe to get actual intake temps between the two in a week or so though.
__________________
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST