E90Post
 


 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > Moroso - Vishnu Procede v2.02 vs Dinan Flash



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-17-2008, 02:55 PM   #67
Orb
Lieutenant Colonel
No_Country
119
Rep
1,764
Posts

Drives: 335
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335lvr View Post
Would you explain this one for me. If there is testing that my tune will blow the turbos up in 3 years...I want to know. Also, does AA "feel" that certain tunes will grenade the motor, or do they have actual testing to prove this?

Edit: I feel guilty for adding to this off topic dribble. There's no way the Dinan time offers a truly representative example. Especially with the M/T.
They say they have testing and numbers. I would phone AA as they seem to will to discuss the information with the public.

Orb
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 03:43 PM   #68
jdink
Major
jdink's Avatar
United_States
53
Rep
1,332
Posts

Drives: '08 E90 335i 6MT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland, OR

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
With that logic, I'll just run 7psi instead. Because I'm really looking forward to running against the guy down the street in 10 years.

Seriously now, where do you pull these forecasts from? Is it what you think or what you hope?

-shiv
Shiv,

I'm thinking that I don't want to buy a house for another 3-4 years. With that in mind, what PSI do u think i should run? 5? 6?

__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 03:44 PM   #69
B'CahiLL-The Boss
First Lieutenant
86
Rep
300
Posts

Drives: M6 with Kellener's - next. AW
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA

iTrader: (0)

What other mods do you have ? just 2.02 map
__________________
My 2011 reality dream car: F430 black. Brand new.
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 03:46 PM   #70
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
166
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu View Post
If I recall reading correctly, the v2 driver only got in 1 run, ran 91oct (not 100oct like funkdoc) and had 300lbs of junk in his car So I'm not sure how fair of a comparison it is. FWIW, I've run 112mph traps at that same track back when I only had a catback and ran v2.0.2. Also on 100oct so I think that is more of a apples to apples comparo.

Back to this thread:
Good show sleepdoc! Nice do see you guys doing well down there in Florida. I think sflgator ran traps that were pretty close to yours (111.x?) with his v2 a few months ago with his 6AT and 93oct. Excellent work. Moroso is no joke from what I hear. I think you will really like v3. It's got a few features that should help you (and me for that matter) get those 60' times down

Cheers,
shiv
Correct, Shiv...see my sig (and I've only been to the track 2x in my life -- once with PROcede v1.47 and once with PROcede v2! Sleepdoc -- great numbers with v2.02, man...congrats!!! For a comparison to my v2 runs in Dec., '07 (sig), my 60ft. was 1.984 sec. I wish I could've joined you guys last night in the cooler weather; plus I have new Falken FK-452 tires which could help with the launch (I haven't been able to really spin them yet).

It's interesting to see the Dinan 335i running so slowly; maybe it was just an off night for him, but consistently trapping at 105mph is just above what a stock 335i traps at (103-104mph) so it doesn't sound right. It would think a Dinan 335i would trap ~ 107-109mph.
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |

Last edited by sflgator; 04-17-2008 at 04:07 PM..
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 03:48 PM   #71
remydlc
Captain
remydlc's Avatar
United_States
24
Rep
617
Posts

Drives: F30 N55 MT/blue metal/red int.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: South Florida

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdink View Post
Shiv,

I'm thinking that I don't want to buy a house for another 3-4 years. With that in mind, what PSI do u think i should run? 5? 6?

If that is what you are thinking, then you shouldn't buy a house at all. now is the time.
__________________
root@bash-it# shift -g 6 -c 335i | grep "155 MPH"
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 03:49 PM   #72
sleepdoc
Lieutenant
sleepdoc's Avatar
259
Rep
475
Posts

Drives: 2022 M3CX DG/Blk
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Florida

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by boosted305 View Post
sleepdoc:

what other, if any, mods do you have besides V2?

great run by the way!
Thanks! - V2.02 only.
__________________
Sold 2018 F80 M3
Sold 2010 Nissan GTR
Sold: 2008 335i
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 03:50 PM   #73
5soko
Brigadier General
5soko's Avatar
351
Rep
4,633
Posts

Drives: M5
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335lvr View Post
Ohh please! That is simply not true. Although I do agree that they should not be compared in this particular case.
what exactly isnt true? i have owned both and many of my friend have hit the track that i have seen both in action each time, not only did the MT have a slower ET but a trap speed aswell. of course its a more driver based topic of course but AT helps build some boost from the get go, keeps that momentum going and easier to hook up with more power.
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 04:04 PM   #74
e.n335
Moderator
e.n335's Avatar
Austria
282
Rep
4,481
Posts

Drives: e93 ///M3 DCT, 07/2009
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Switzerland, ZH

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sflgator View Post
Correct, Shiv...see my sig (and I've only been to the track 2x in my life -- once with PROcede v1.47 and once with PROcede v2! Sleepdoc -- great numbers with v2.02, man...congrats!!! For a comparison to my v2 runs in Dec., '07 (sig), my 60ft. was 1.984 sec. I wish I could've joined you guys last night in the cooler weather; plus I have new Falken FK452 tires which could help with the launch (I haven't been able to really spin them yet).

It's interesting to see the Dinan 335i running so slowly; maybe it was just an off night for him, but consistently trapping at 105mph is just above what a stock 335i traps at (103-104mph) so it doesn't sound right. It would think a Dinan 335i would trap ~ 107-109mph.
Offtopic but interesting ... please let us know how the Falken's perform.
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 04:07 PM   #75
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
166
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by e.n335 View Post
Offtopic but interesting ... please let us know how the Falken's perform.
So far (~1k mi. on them), I'm very happy with the Falken FK-452s...and they cost > $400 less/set of 4 than the Mich PS2s.
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 04:14 PM   #76
Kbueno
Lieutenant Colonel
Kbueno's Avatar
United_States
101
Rep
1,712
Posts

Drives: F82
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5soko335i View Post
what exactly isnt true? i have owned both and many of my friend have hit the track that i have seen both in action each time, not only did the MT have a slower ET but a trap speed aswell. of course its a more driver based topic of course but AT helps build some boost from the get go, keeps that momentum going and easier to hook up with more power.
The statement "AT always run faster at the 1/4 mile then MT's" is not true. I have driven both, flogged both, and they are too close to call.
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 04:18 PM   #77
5soko
Brigadier General
5soko's Avatar
351
Rep
4,633
Posts

Drives: M5
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 335lvr View Post
The statement "AT always run faster at the 1/4 mile then MT's" is not true. I have driven both, flogged both, and they are too close to call.
i should have added depending on driver, MOST of the time, 85% of the time the MT is slower then the AT, they are def not too close to call at all..... on one given night at my hometown track almost all the MT 335i were getting somthing like a 13.8 ET's all nite long while the AT's were getting 13.5's!!! get some MT drivers and go to track, esp if u dont know the track launching a tuned MT 335i at the track is a its pretty much a know fact lol but like i said, some people know there cars really well and can really feel the launch... the AT is just idiot proff, brake launch, and pedal to the floor.( most of the time)
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 04:21 PM   #78
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
166
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Gotta love the ZF 6AT tranny with the paddles!!!!!!
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 04:34 PM   #79
Kbueno
Lieutenant Colonel
Kbueno's Avatar
United_States
101
Rep
1,712
Posts

Drives: F82
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5soko335i View Post
i should have added depending on driver, MOST of the time, 85% of the time the MT is slower then the AT, they are def not too close to call at all..... on one given night at my hometown track almost all the MT 335i were getting somthing like a 13.8 ET's all nite long while the AT's were getting 13.5's!!! get some MT drivers and go to track, esp if u dont know the track launching a tuned MT 335i at the track is a its pretty much a know fact lol but like i said, some people know there cars really well and can really feel the launch... the AT is just idiot proff, brake launch, and pedal to the floor.( most of the time)
Agreed: Depending on driver. I should add that my experience with comparing both trannys have been going WOT from a roll.
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 04:36 PM   #80
5soko
Brigadier General
5soko's Avatar
351
Rep
4,633
Posts

Drives: M5
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sflgator View Post
Gotta love the ZF 6AT tranny with the paddles!!!!!!
HELL YEA!!!!


Quote:
Originally Posted by 335lvr View Post
Agreed: Depending on driver. I should add that my experience with comparing both trannys have been going WOT from a roll.
from a roll i agree with you its close. but i agree with your last statement aswell
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 04:37 PM   #81
garyhgaryh
Major
garyhgaryh's Avatar
United_States
79
Rep
1,232
Posts

Drives: Supercharged e30 M3
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: santa cruz

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbotko View Post
Here we go again. sheez it just never ever stops does it. The truth is........NOBODY KNOWS!!! Not Dinan, Not AA, especially not Orb or Eugene, and not Vishnu. We will all have to wait and see what the long term effects are of the tunes.


Me personally............I don't give a fuck!! I modifiy my car because I want to, and if the sonofabitch blows up then I'll deal with it at that time. If you crybabies are sooooooo worried about blowing shit up..........LEAVE IT STOCK!!!!!!!
Orb and I have gotten into it about testing and such. In my opinion, no one knows. I don't care who says they know, if they don't have anything proof to back it up, then it's all about marketing. If any vendor does know, they've probably blown up an engine or turbo with their tune . In time, we will know (from actual users, not from the vendors as they are all biased one way or another).

Gary
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 04:46 PM   #82
radgator1
Lieutenant Colonel
radgator1's Avatar
53
Rep
1,600
Posts

Drives: e90 335i
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2007 e90 335i  [0.00]
2007 e90 335i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyhgaryh View Post
Orb and I have gotten into it about testing and such. In my opinion, no one knows. I don't care who says they know, if they don't have anything proof to back it up, then it's all about marketing. If any vendor does know, they've probably blown up an engine or turbo with their tune . In time, we will know (from actual users, not from the vendors as they are all biased one way or another).

Gary
The knock retard system is so good I don't think we will see many engine failures anytime soon unless someone does something really crazy, but the turbos are not going to last forever and it doesn't take a genius to know the harder you push them the sooner they will wear out.
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 05:49 PM   #83
335ICoupe
Second Lieutenant
335ICoupe's Avatar
United_States
11
Rep
208
Posts

Drives: 2008 M3
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Florida

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5soko335i View Post
i should have added depending on driver, MOST of the time, 85% of the time the MT is slower then the AT, they are def not too close to call at all..... on one given night at my hometown track almost all the MT 335i were getting somthing like a 13.8 ET's all nite long while the AT's were getting 13.5's!!! get some MT drivers and go to track, esp if u dont know the track launching a tuned MT 335i at the track is a its pretty much a know fact lol but like i said, some people know there cars really well and can really feel the launch... the AT is just idiot proff, brake launch, and pedal to the floor.( most of the time)
Sounds about right;
http://www.e90post.com/forums/showth...t=93664&page=2
13.859 was my best stock
__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 07:41 PM   #84
ybbiz34
Brigadier General
ybbiz34's Avatar
706
Rep
4,959
Posts

Drives: 2023 330i M Sport
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (1)

If possible at this point at time, let's try to get this discussion back on topic, if anyone can remember what the topic was.
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 07:43 PM   #85
Wicked_SVT
Second Lieutenant
Wicked_SVT's Avatar
9
Rep
203
Posts

Drives: E92 335i
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sflgator View Post
Oh, Bubbles is just pissed b/c another Dinan 335i ran 13.4 sec. @ 105mph vs. a PROcede v2 335i that ran 12.5 @ 112mph side-by-side at the same track on the same night. Oh yeah, and that's why Bubbles refuses to run with me or any other PROcede v2 (forget v3) 335i...fear of embarrassment. j/k Bubbles...you know I don't take offense to your rejection.
Are we really trying to compare these two tunes? I think we know which one is faster. The V2 is not only making more boost it holds it through red line were the Dinan tune tapers off. So it really isn't a surprise that the V2 was faster. A better comparison would be V1.4 vs Dinan. As far as the slow Dinan time, there is only two times posted with Dinan:

1. 12.9 AT
2. 13.4 MT

I believe when the V2 first came out there were also people that were not getting good times with the MT as well and alot of it had to do with driver experience. I need to get up to Fontana with my Dinan tune so we can get some more times. I have a MT with everything else being stock. Launching the MT is definatley not easy.

Great times sleepdoc!!
__________________
07 E92 335i Space Grey
Sport Package | Premium Package | Comfort Access| Black Dakota Leather | Grey Poplar | 6MT

2001 SVT Cobra Vortech Supercharged 450rwhp 408rwtq SAE SOLD
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 07:53 PM   #86
Jason
Administrator
Jason's Avatar
United_States
43833
Rep
21,327
Posts

Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

All of the off-topic / unnecessary stuff (especially tuner vs. tuner crap) in the last couple pages has been cleaned up. Anyone perpetuating the discussions that have been deleted will be infracted.

Those wanting to discuss AA and stress testing can start a new thread.
__________________
Check on the Latest BMW News
Become a fan of Bimmerpost Facebook
Follow us on Bimmerpost Twitter
Subscribe to Bimmerpost Youtube Channel
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 07:54 PM   #87
ybbiz34
Brigadier General
ybbiz34's Avatar
706
Rep
4,959
Posts

Drives: 2023 330i M Sport
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wicked_SVT View Post
Are we really trying to compare these two tunes? I think we know which one is faster. The V2 is not only making more boost it holds it through red line were the Dinan tune tapers off. So it really isn't a surprise that the V2 was faster. A better comparison would be V1.4 vs Dinan. As far as the slow Dinan time, there is only two times posted with Dinan:

1. 12.9 AT
2. 13.4 MT

I believe when the V2 first came out there were also people that were not getting good times with the MT as well and alot of it had to do with driver experience. I need to get up to Fontana with my Dinan tune so we can get some more times. I have a MT with everything else being stock. Launching the MT is definatley not easy.

Great times sleepdoc!!
Good, relevant post. And with "Great times sleepdoc" this thread is back on topic. Nice timing WickedSVT.
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2008, 07:55 PM   #88
sflgator
Major General
sflgator's Avatar
166
Rep
5,389
Posts

Drives: '09 MB C63 AMG & '08 MB GL450
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: U.S.

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wicked_SVT View Post
Are we really trying to compare these two tunes? I think we know which one is faster. The V2 is not only making more boost it holds it through red line were the Dinan tune tapers off. So it really isn't a surprise that the V2 was faster. A better comparison would be V1.4 vs Dinan. As far as the slow Dinan time, there is only two times posted with Dinan:

1. 12.9 AT
2. 13.4 MT

I believe when the V2 first came out there were also people that were not getting good times with the MT as well and alot of it had to do with driver experience. I need to get up to Fontana with my Dinan tune so we can get some more times. I have a MT with everything else being stock. Launching the MT is definatley not easy.

Great times sleepdoc!!
Yes, I agree that the 13.4 sec. @ 105mph for the Dinan 335i doesn't sound right, even @ Moroso. As I mentioned b4, I would think a Dinan 335i should trap 107-108mph @ Moroso. And, yes, PROcede v2 runs higher boost, and should be faster, but there are those ppl who spent > $2,000 on the Dinan ECU Flash that swear their car is as fast or faster than a PROcede v2 335i.
__________________

|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod |
| TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers |
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 PM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST