Eric's HPF Single Turbo N54 Is ALIVE - VIDEO

ETS Michael · 03-22-2012, 12:18 PM

This is why I would put the 6766 on the 335i

farbmw · 03-22-2012, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ETS Michael

This is why I would put the 6766 on the 335i

So why did they not go this route with the 335i?

jpsimon · 03-22-2012, 01:05 PM

did you ever hear anything from them after their last dyno session?

ETS Michael · 03-22-2012, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by farbmw

So why did they not go this route with the 335i?

I bet the customer wants faster spool and transient response instead of top end since it's a stock block. The supra can spool a 6766 by 3800 rpms and it pulls all the way to 9k. That's a good power band in my eyes

My car doesn't even hook in first or down low anyways. The supra also doesn't have vanos so who knows, we may be able to spool the 67 quick on the 335i.

Maybe Shiv or HPF will try this turbo next

Stage 2 Drew · 03-22-2012, 05:19 PM

And it still runs 11s?

LOL. Jk man!

OpenFlash · 03-22-2012, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ETS Michael

I bet the customer wants faster spool and transient response instead of top end since it's a stock block. The supra can spool a 6766 by 3800 rpms and it pulls all the way to 9k. That's a good power band in my eyes

My car doesn't even hook in first or down low anyways. The supra also doesn't have vanos so who knows, we may be able to spool the 67 quick on the 335i.

Maybe Shiv or HPF will try this turbo next

The 62mm turbo that we are using is capable of supporting over 750whp. So once we make another 100whp, it's only natural for the 67mm to be next logical step

klipseracer · 03-22-2012, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

The 62mm turbo that we are using is capable of supporting over 750whp. So once we make another 100whp, it's only natural for the 67mm to be next logical step

Any chance to push past 22 psi? Or are you still fine tuning on the stock tmap.

ETS Michael · 03-22-2012, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

The 62mm turbo that we are using is capable of supporting over 750whp. So once we make another 100whp, it's only natural for the 67mm to be next logical step

Look at all those 6266 and 6766 - Those are for Evo 8/9, Subaru and Supra kits. Get me a finalized tuning solution and I will build a kit.

The average 6266 build on the evo 8/9 at 35psi puts down around 750whp. The 6 cylinder will be a bit lower (650hp). I have some good graphs of the 6766 on a supra that we put together for the shop. The turbo reaches full boost 25psi at 3800rpms and pulls to 9k on an auto. at 25psi we put down over 700whp. (before we ran out of fuel on the supra)

The 6766 i think is the turbo of choice if you want to make 600 on pump gas numbers and over 700's on race gas.

OpenFlash · 03-22-2012, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klipseracer

Any chance to push past 22 psi? Or are you still fine tuning on the stock tmap.

We are running a 3.5bar MAP sensor now. Still running 20-21psi of boost on a daily driven basis. We have a couple magazine tests/reviews lined up next month so we are going to keep it where it is for the time being since it know it's stable and safe. Once we bet past these obligations, we'll bump up power a bit. Beyond that, we will be going with a built motor that revs higher than 7000rpm At which point a 67mm turbo would be a good fit.

Shiv

dlbrooks18 · 03-22-2012, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

We are running a 3.5bar MAP sensor now. Still running 20-21psi of boost on a daily driven basis. We have a couple magazine tests/reviews lined up next month so we are going to keep it where it is for the time being since it know it's stable and safe. Once we bet past these obligations, we'll bump up power a bit. Beyond that, we will be going with a built motor that revs higher than 7000rpm At which point a 67mm turbo would be a good fit.

Shiv

Sounds like a plan

rezin23 · 03-22-2012, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

Beyond that, we will be going with a built motor that revs higher than 7000rpm At which point a 67mm turbo would be a good fit.

Shiv

YES!!!

Fundahl · 03-22-2012, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

We are running a 3.5bar MAP sensor now. Still running 20-21psi of boost on a daily driven basis. We have a couple magazine tests/reviews lined up next month so we are going to keep it where it is for the time being since it know it's stable and safe. Once we bet past these obligations, we'll bump up power a bit. Beyond that, we will be going with a built motor that revs higher than 7000rpm At which point a 67mm turbo would be a good fit.

Shiv

No race gas/meth testing above 21psi? I know that turbo can easily support that, and from your tear-down thread the motor should be alright as long as you have great octane, right?

chris b. · 03-22-2012, 08:44 PM

OpenFlash · 03-22-2012, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fundahl

No race gas/meth testing above 21psi? I know that turbo can easily support that, and from your tear-down thread the motor should be alright as long as you have great octane, right?

As mentioned in the last post, we will run more boost after we take car of a few magazine commitments. But until then, we'll keep it as-is at ~600-625whp. Before we start making more power, we have some work to do (DSS axles and proper suspension primarily). Sorry for the thread jack HPF.

Castr_85M · 03-22-2012, 10:56 PM

Only bad thing to come out of shiv's kit is that upgrades to the procede for us "old" twin turbo setups are going to slow down... :-/

Q4P · 03-22-2012, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

We are running a 3.5bar MAP sensor now. Still running 20-21psi of boost on a daily driven basis. We have a couple magazine tests/reviews lined up next month so we are going to keep it where it is for the time being since it know it's stable and safe. Once we bet past these obligations, we'll bump up power a bit. Beyond that, we will be going with a built motor that revs higher than 7000rpm At which point a 67mm turbo would be a good fit.

Shiv

Like I said... this is finally starting to become a serious platform

Tiago@VRSF · 03-22-2012, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alofoque

Only bad thing to come out of shiv's kit is that upgrades to the procede for us "old" twin turbo setups are going to slow down... :-/

I'm still running software from summer of last year and I still love how the car feels. There's only so many ways to improve a great tune

pits200 · 04-07-2012, 10:26 AM

So ummmm, I thought the revised manifold was up and working. Whats going on here, any updates.

dlbrooks18 · 04-07-2012, 11:45 AM

Eric should be getting his car back soon, can't wait to read his review

HPF Chris · 04-08-2012, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pits200

So ummmm, I thought the revised manifold was up and working. Whats going on here, any updates.

The fuel pump went out. We got a new fuel pump in it and it is back on the dyno. We're going to turn the boost up to around 520-530rwhp and a little more driveability tuning and it's off to Eric to enjoy.

I think there are a couple other components that we're installing which will be very quick.

Chris.

klipseracer · 04-08-2012, 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HPF Chris

The fuel pump went out. We got a new fuel pump in it and it is back on the dyno. We're going to turn the boost up to around 520-530rwhp and a little more driveability tuning and it's off to Eric to enjoy.

I think there are a couple other components that we're installing which will be very quick.

Chris.

Pump right? Also when do you plan on stage 2 or whatever its called?

hellrotm · 04-08-2012, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klipseracer

Pump right? Also when do you plan on stage 2 or whatever its called?

Yeah I think that is straight 92 octane, no meth. Sounds like a nice DD.

03-22-2012, 12:18 PM	#1057
ETS Michael Major 80 Rep 1,155 Posts Drives: 335i Join Date: May 2009 Location: Vancouver, WA iTrader: (4)	This is why I would put the 6766 on the 335i
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-22-2012, 01:05 PM	#1059
jpsimon Team Zissou 3154 Rep 10,200 Posts Drives: 2022 AWD M3 Comp - SMB Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: CT iTrader: (7)	did you ever hear anything from them after their last dyno session?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-22-2012, 05:19 PM	#1061
Stage 2 Drew Second Lieutenant 9 Rep 206 Posts Drives: an SRT4 that beats ur 335 :-) Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: teh 909 iTrader: (0)	And it still runs 11s? LOL. Jk man!
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-22-2012, 08:44 PM	#1069
chris b. Brigadier General 118 Rep 3,345 Posts Drives: zmp e90 Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: White Plains NY iTrader: (1) Garage List 2010 335i [0.00]	__________________ Brentuning Cobb AP pro tune -IG: @beemeraddict 2010 335i zmp fbo, 465/513 E60 mix
	Appreciate 0 Quote

03-22-2012, 10:56 PM	#1071
Castr_85M Captain 57 Rep 943 Posts Drives: AW/Fox 6MT E90 M3 Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: NYC iTrader: (7)	Only bad thing to come out of shiv's kit is that upgrades to the procede for us "old" twin turbo setups are going to slow down... :-/ __________________ E90 M3 AW/Extended FR•Ohlins•Borla•ACM•K&N•IND•BBS•Vredestein•Velos Designworks•Vorsteiner•BMW Performance•Lux AE•Arkym
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-07-2012, 10:26 AM	#1074
pits200 Colonel 552 Rep 2,598 Posts Drives: 09 335i X-Drive Black Sapphire Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Pittsburgh iTrader: (1)	So ummmm, I thought the revised manifold was up and working. Whats going on here, any updates.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

04-07-2012, 11:45 AM	#1075
dlbrooks18 Brigadier General 164 Rep 3,735 Posts Drives: e90 335i Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Los Angeles iTrader: (2)	Eric should be getting his car back soon, can't wait to read his review __________________ 2008 E90 335
	Appreciate 0 Quote