|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Dinan Software Warning...bad tuners.
|
|
01-14-2008, 02:58 PM | #89 |
Lieutenant Colonel
45
Rep 1,683
Posts |
Maybe good ole Stan can chime in and post up some Hard Facts of Dinans torture test of the N54.....
willing to bet they put Phuk all into it... no way they were allowed to tap into the M3 territory...
__________________
Life is Good
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 03:11 PM | #91 | |
Private First Class
1
Rep 161
Posts |
Quote:
lol, they are very quick! I am looking at getting one but, understanding there is risk involved. Not sure everyone understands that. Most seem very quick to throw on the latest version for more power without thinking twice about it. Let’s just say, if I get one, I will not be the one testing the torque limits on V2. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 05:21 PM | #92 | |
Modder Raider
795
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
I stand corrected. Yeash! He's definitely playing with fire on this one.
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 05:38 PM | #93 |
Several N54 cars, V1,3, V2.0.2, and V3.1
12
Rep 778
Posts |
He certainly would not buy Dinan reflash and add a half JB1 since he has the same performance with his JB2H. Technically it should work ok for Dinan customers, but I don't think any Dinan customer would show up for this. Procede customers might be more interested in getting to the 15psi this way. Or with race gas to even more than 15psi.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 06:12 PM | #94 | |
Modder Raider
795
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
Quote:
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 06:15 PM | #95 | |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 571
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 06:17 PM | #96 |
Major
677
Rep 1,189
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 06:17 PM | #97 |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 571
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 06:20 PM | #98 | |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 571
Posts |
Quote:
If I had to do it all again...I'd go with Dinan. What is another $600 for a stable program that works and I suspect the customer service is good too. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 07:32 PM | #103 |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 571
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 07:34 PM | #104 | |
Captain
73
Rep 627
Posts |
Quote:
Sounds to me like he is one of the most knowledgeable members on the board. I feel like a large percent of the members talk out of their asses and they have no engineering knowledge what so ever. The points Orb is making are very valid, and I agree that the smaller tuners do not have the resources to do the proper testing. What do you consider "hard testing"? Driving the car until it breaks? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 07:40 PM | #105 |
Lieutenant Colonel
362
Rep 1,532
Posts
Drives: Ever changing fleet
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama
|
I'm not advocating doing or not doing what Terry says, but a 1/2 strength JB1 would add about a pound of boost. If thats going to "blow" things up, the procede'ed cars would have done so by now.
__________________
23 IOMG G80 CX, 23 iX M60, 24 GT3RS PTS Weissach, 24 RS E-tron GT
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 07:49 PM | #106 |
Brigadier General
346
Rep 4,633
Posts |
why would people do that anyways, the whole point of the flash is not to go into the ecu physically and to have a great running engine tuned by dinan with there boost levels.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 07:55 PM | #107 |
Lieutenant Colonel
362
Rep 1,532
Posts
Drives: Ever changing fleet
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alabama
|
I never said there was a point, BUT, thinking like somebody who wants closer to procede power with as much "safety" as possible, it would make a bit more sense.
The Dinan flash is mapped for more boost. A piggyback on top of it with a target for ~15 psi would have to attenuate the map sensor much less than a procede running on the factory programming. This puts the ECU into the load cells (which have actually been tuned by Dinan) much more closely correlating to the actual load of the engine, rather than having to shift timing and other parameters in large amounts to compensate....and in theory is "safer." As I said before, I'm not advocating in either direction....just commenting on an interesting idea.
__________________
23 IOMG G80 CX, 23 iX M60, 24 GT3RS PTS Weissach, 24 RS E-tron GT
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 08:20 PM | #108 | |
Samtaro!
128
Rep 2,605
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 08:20 PM | #109 | |
Colonel
52
Rep 2,225
Posts |
Quote:
I don't know...it's a tough call for them sometimes...imo. I'm one of the "fanboys" (I hate that label, but it is was it is) that has received great service from vishnu from day 1. I sincerely wish everbody felt this way.
__________________
07 335i sedan | Steptronic | Black saphire | Terra | ZPP | ZSP | Cold Weather | CA | PDC | Nav | OEM Alarm
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 08:31 PM | #110 | |
Modder Raider
795
Rep 8,633
Posts
Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surf City, HB
|
I agree.
Quote:
__________________
e36 M3 Coupe, e36 325i Sedan
e90 335i--SOLD Best 60-130-------------9.15 Seconds------------------WWW.MR5RACING.COM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|