[Maxicooper]

Originally Posted by Boost XXI

I just loaded V2.02 (standard, not v1 orv2) 93 and loved it. I only had the chance to put about 10 miles on but, it seemed to have all the power down low that I had before.
Also, the wiper issue was gone and the reflash took no more than 2 minutes.

+1, on the V2.02/STD, love it!!!. Still got power, but definitely smoother than of the 2.01.

I wish I could switch back'n forth between V2.01/93 and V2.02/STD93 on the fly, then it will be Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.

Btw, mine has Steptronic Tranny.

[MikesBMW]

hmm i didnt see a 202 regular map, only the V1 and V2, ill have to check again

[Maxicooper]

Originally Posted by MB135i

hmm i didnt see a 202 regular map, only the V1 and V2, ill have to check again

The STD version are at the top.

[MikesBMW]

^ ok cool, ill install that later today and take it for a spin

[Alan l.]

Cobb - Can someone give us more details in terms of what changed between the v201 and v202 (regular, not v1 or v2) maps aside from being smoother? Interested in the details behind the scene so to speak.

Where V202 lacks is low rpm light throttle power. Car feels stock until you have the throttle at least 50% or more. I miss the original cobb maps (pre 2.XX maps)

Alan

[Maxicooper]

Originally Posted by MB135i

^ ok cool, ill install that later today and take it for a spin

This was what I did yesterday.

I uninstalled V2.01, and drove on stock map for about an hour, on the way to work. Then I installed V2.02/V1. I could feel the smoothness of power building up (and smile on my face).
At the end I switched to V2.02/STD. Wow what a different (HUGH smile on my face)!!!

If you switched from V2.01 to V2.02/V1 or V2 right away, you might just "feel" that the car lost power with the new map, because you still used to the powersurge from the old map.

Best is the go back to stock, and drive for an hour or so, then switch.

My 2 cents.

[Frampton]

i'm not seeing the lack of power ya'll are talking about with the 2.02 std map vs 2.01 map. I touch the throttle on the 2.02 std map and my car goes sideways, literally 10% throttle puts major power down as compared to stock. The difference I noticed is that you don't get the jumping power delivery and unexpected WOT feel that was there in 2.01. When you hold the throttle at a specific spot it stays at that spot as far as power goes.

I will likely need to run the v1 or v2 at the track though, i'm sure they are similar to the beta 2.02 maps I've tried.

[MikesBMW]

Originally Posted by Maxicooper

This was what I did yesterday.

I uninstalled V2.01, and drove on stock map for about an hour, on the way to work. Then I installed V2.02/V1. I could feel the smoothness of power building up (and smile on my face).
At the end I switched to V2.02/STD. Wow what a different (HUGH smile on my face)!!!

If you switched from V2.01 to V2.02/V1 or V2 right away, you might just "feel" that the car lost power with the new map, because you still used to the powersurge from the old map.

Best is the go back to stock, and drive for an hour or so, then switch.

My 2 cents.

ill have to give that a shot

[135iNewb]

Alot of you guys are missing the REGULAR 2.02 93 OCT MAP!

There's a sluggish 2.02 "V1" and 2.02 "V2", 1 being for auto's and 2 for manuals, and then there is the REGULAR 2.02 91/93 MAPS!

The V maps are much too sluggish if you ask me, but the regular 2.02 map is great. Just like 2.01 but without the jumpiness.

[Monster335]

So where am I suppose to look for this new v202 version, only one I see is the 201 update when I plug in my device and do the update. Thx

[boom]

I notice with the 2.01-1 map that my mileage is higher. I monitored boost and it's like 2-4 psi under normal operation until you really get in it. That resulted in much better mileage for my commute this morning. I would think it would be better for preserving oil temps as well. IMO it's a great sleeper map. It takes more pedal to get there but you get all the power at wot.

[MicaCeli]

Originally Posted by boom

I notice with the 2.01-1 map that my mileage is higher. I monitored boost and it's like 2-4 psi under normal operation until you really get in it. That resulted in much better mileage for my commute this morning. I would think it would be better for preserving oil temps as well. IMO it's a great sleeper map. It takes more pedal to get there but you get all the power at wot.

You mean the 2.02v1 map?

[vasillalov]

Originally Posted by Monster335

So where am I suppose to look for this new v202 version, only one I see is the 201 update when I plug in my device and do the update. Thx

Dude, go to their site. Download the maps manually. Add them to your AP manually.

It's not that hard...

[Clap135]

I tired all these 201 and 202 maps.....lol have fun I went back to the 200 map...its perfect for me

[Alan l.]

speaking of MPG i noticed its pretty bad on my car with the Cobb tune. I can't get the mpg gauge on the dash to read over 27mpg no matter what and thats cruising on the highway with barely any throttle. Most of the time i average about 12mpg lol

My exhaust tips are also more black than usual. I'm assuming this is because the cobb tune tends to run more rich compared to the piggies. Not a big deal since i didn't buy this tune to get better gas mileage

BTW my car is a 6MT

Alan

[ncrzrbk]

Love the new maps!! Much smother linear power for steptronic.

[MicaCeli]

My wife gets 26.5mpg average now....down from 27 something from no tune. But she doesn't go WOT the whole 54 miles to work

[OneThreeFive]

I am planning to post a separate thread later tonight with graphs and logs, but attached is a summary of my morning on the dyno.

[mithiral67]

I had a recent 300mile round trip to test the mpg on the cobb. I was trying to hypermile and got 38 out (sunny) and 32 back (raining and windy). Included a pit stop in both directions and averaged 70mph.

[Bimmeroid]

I have now tried all three maps (93 octane), 202 std, 202v1, and 202v2. I felt 202 std has the closes power delivery to 201 map without the surges, it felt smoother (but not perfect). v1 and v2 feels more stock to me in comparison, especially in lower RPM. 202 std is almost perfect (needs some tweaking), it has available power at lower RPM, and lunges forward at 30% throttle.

[mithiral67]

I like 2.02 standard.

[ssm3nyc]

nevermind