E90Post
 


TNT Racewerks
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N55 Turbo Engine Tuning and Exhaust Modifications - 335i Tuning > Pure Turbos N55 single turbo upgrade



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-23-2014, 12:38 PM   #1189
ShlemonboostedM
Banned
ShlemonboostedM's Avatar
94
Rep
586
Posts

Drives: 335i F30
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: brooklyn ny

iTrader: (4)

That's so me ...
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2014, 10:21 PM   #1190
iuhutch
Captain
iuhutch's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
656
Posts

Drives: 18%E2%80%99 F80 ZCP
Join Date: May 2013
Location: local

iTrader: (0)

The turbo is in and she now has 48 miles on her with no hiccups at all! The install ended up taking us about 9 hrs and that was between not being able to get the damn turbo out through the engine bay and having an accidental removal of an A/C line (to open more room up to get the turbo out from under the engine bay), the install itself wasn't too bad. Coolant was annoying as it was definitely dripped out of every tube possible. All and all totally worth the groupbuy to get this upgrade!


The car is an absolute beast now. Havent gone too crazy with her yet as wanting to settle the changes in; also seeing some adoption in the logs, is this expected? Between my first 17psi pull and the now 19 psi peak, afr, timing, smoothness of boost and rpm curves all seem to be smoothing out.

My biggest concern is that the ecu is only seeing 4.8psi of boost and this scares me with the DCT?

Second call out (not really a concern) is that I'm only holding ~13psi at 6,200+ rpms? I'm barely holding 15 at 6k flat. Still WAY better than the original snail but per some other logs, this seems to be a bit lower?

Using map 6, I played with the PID gain (from 25 to 10) and upped the higher rpm targets to 17 but haven't change much else yet tuning wise. Would love to hear thought from others that have had this turbo and running map 6 a bit longer if there is a better config than the below. Also attaching logs too.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxD...it?usp=sharing
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2014, 10:32 PM   #1191
1cleann55
First Lieutenant
46
Rep
394
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New jersey

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by iuhutch View Post
The turbo is in and she now has 48 miles on her with no hiccups at all! The install ended up taking us about 9 hrs and that was between not being able to get the damn turbo out through the engine bay and having an accidental removal of an A/C line (to open more room up to get the turbo out from under the engine bay), the install itself wasn't too bad. Coolant was annoying as it was definitely dripped out of every tube possible. All and all totally worth the groupbuy to get this upgrade!


The car is an absolute beast now. Havent gone too crazy with her yet as wanting to settle the changes in; also seeing some adoption in the logs, is this expected? Between my first 17psi pull and the now 19 psi peak, afr, timing, smoothness of boost and rpm curves all seem to be smoothing out.

My biggest concern is that the ecu is only seeing 4.8psi of boost and this scares me with the DCT?

Second call out (not really a concern) is that I'm only holding ~13psi at 6,200+ rpms? I'm barely holding 15 at 6k flat. Still WAY better than the original snail but per some other logs, this seems to be a bit lower?

Using map 6, I played with the PID gain (from 25 to 10) and upped the higher rpm targets to 17 but haven't change much else yet tuning wise. Would love to hear thought from others that have had this turbo and running map 6 a bit longer if there is a better config than the below. Also attaching logs too.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxD...it?usp=sharing

I own a android phone so reading your csv file is hard. 1st question. What map is this on? That boost curve looks like map 7 boost curve which is really weird.
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2014, 10:59 PM   #1192
iuhutch
Captain
iuhutch's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
656
Posts

Drives: 18%E2%80%99 F80 ZCP
Join Date: May 2013
Location: local

iTrader: (0)

Read a bit more on n54 and noticed T didnt mess with map 6 on the ewg pure setup.

The previous post above was an old map 6.

Had to go for one more quick ride trying map 7 and then map 6 again. Per my thought earlier, the engine seems to be adapting quickly. Overall pulls are starting to feel less jerky and more responsive on the top end.

I'm having an issue with my .csv's? Keeps saying invalid file when I try to upload WTF?
Attached Images
  
Appreciate 0
      08-23-2014, 11:48 PM   #1193
JETmn
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
247
Rep
1,595
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i xDrive Msport
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Orlando

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2011 335Xi  [0.00]
Did you do a boost leak test after the install? I think it looks like you have a boost leak. It is falling off hard around 6k.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 12:33 AM   #1194
iuhutch
Captain
iuhutch's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
656
Posts

Drives: 18%E2%80%99 F80 ZCP
Join Date: May 2013
Location: local

iTrader: (0)

Not sure it's a boost leak. I'll double check the hot side of the fmic tho. My thought was potential opening Of the plastic DV? Also another thought I had was a lb or two of pressure loss through 7" fmic? Also seems to be holding it more the more I run it.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 12:35 AM   #1195
JETmn
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
247
Rep
1,595
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i xDrive Msport
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Orlando

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2011 335Xi  [0.00]
Bigger FMIC will be less loss if the construction inside is equal. I think you have the VRSF, right? That one doesn't seem to have much loss to it.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 02:34 AM   #1196
Newguy123
Captain
122
Rep
652
Posts

Drives: 2008 Nissan Titan
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Carlsbad

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JETmn View Post
Bigger FMIC will be less loss if the construction inside is equal. I think you have the VRSF, right? That one doesn't seem to have much loss to it.
7" fmic's usually have a ton of pressure drop... From what I've seen and read even the vrsf 5" has a significant amount of pressure drop. Prob why it's one of the cheaper ones on the market.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 04:27 AM   #1197
PeterPure
Major
PeterPure's Avatar
Belgium
677
Rep
1,349
Posts

Drives: BMW F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW F80 M3  [0.00]
If your pwm is at 100 or close to it then the turbo wont give more boost.

My stock fmic does 18 psi at 6k and 17 psi at 6.5k.

The forge fmic did 15.5 psi at 6k and 14.5 psi at 6.5k. And its a small fmic.

My wagner fmic does close to 18 psi at 6k and 16.5 psi at 6.5k.

My bet is that its your huge 7" fmic. Put stock fmic on and retest.

You can always mail me your csv and i have a look.

Tnx,
Peter
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 05:21 AM   #1198
1cleann55
First Lieutenant
46
Rep
394
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New jersey

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by iuhutch View Post
Read a bit more on n54 and noticed T didnt mess with map 6 on the ewg pure setup.

The previous post above was an old map 6.

Had to go for one more quick ride trying map 7 and then map 6 again. Per my thought earlier, the engine seems to be adapting quickly. Overall pulls are starting to feel less jerky and more responsive on the top end.

I'm having an issue with my .csv's? Keeps saying invalid file when I try to upload WTF?
There is definitely something wrong. My car didnt necessarily have to "adapt" so much to hit its new boost targets. After the first pull car was seeing 18-17psi at 6k and 16-15psi at 6500rpm
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 08:23 PM   #1199
iuhutch
Captain
iuhutch's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
656
Posts

Drives: 18%E2%80%99 F80 ZCP
Join Date: May 2013
Location: local

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1cleann55 View Post
There is definitely something wrong. My car didnt necessarily have to "adapt" so much to hit its new boost targets. After the first pull car was seeing 18-17psi at 6k and 16-15psi at 6500rpm
I'll check my hot side intercooler piping but my only thought would be the stock DV is potentially cracking open?

You have the forged, right? Can you post the 16psi 6500rpms please!
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 08:26 PM   #1200
iuhutch
Captain
iuhutch's Avatar
United_States
118
Rep
656
Posts

Drives: 18%E2%80%99 F80 ZCP
Join Date: May 2013
Location: local

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by iuhutch View Post
The turbo is in and she now has 48 miles on her with no hiccups at all! The install ended up taking us about 9 hrs and that was between not being able to get the damn turbo out through the engine bay and having an accidental removal of an A/C line (to open more room up to get the turbo out from under the engine bay), the install itself wasn't too bad. Coolant was annoying as it was definitely dripped out of every tube possible. All and all totally worth the groupbuy to get this upgrade!


The car is an absolute beast now. Havent gone too crazy with her yet as wanting to settle the changes in; also seeing some adoption in the logs, is this expected? Between my first 17psi pull and the now 19 psi peak, afr, timing, smoothness of boost and rpm curves all seem to be smoothing out.

My biggest concern is that the ecu is only seeing 4.8psi of boost and this scares me with the DCT?

Second call out (not really a concern) is that I'm only holding ~13psi at 6,200+ rpms? I'm barely holding 15 at 6k flat. Still WAY better than the original snail but per some other logs, this seems to be a bit lower?

Using map 6, I played with the PID gain (from 25 to 10) and upped the higher rpm targets to 17 but haven't change much else yet tuning wise. Would love to hear thought from others that have had this turbo and running map 6 a bit longer if there is a better config than the below. Also attaching logs too.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxD...it?usp=sharing
In 4th gear, I'm holding 14psi at >6k. I think it's all tuning related would love for PURE to chime in on their thoughts too! Car feels amazing tho
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 10:05 PM   #1201
1cleann55
First Lieutenant
46
Rep
394
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New jersey

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by iuhutch View Post
In 4th gear, I'm holding 14psi at >6k. I think it's all tuning related would love for PURE to chime in on their thoughts too! Car feels amazing tho
I doubt its tuning we all have Jb4 that run the stage 1 turbo and all see 18-16psi at 6k even e36addict whose logs show slightly bellow target shows higher boost than you. I have a helix fmic which I think its 4.5" or 5 I dont recall.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 10:05 PM   #1202
paradoxical3
Lieutenant Colonel
1014
Rep
1,563
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (6)

Any shipping update?
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 10:09 PM   #1203
1cleann55
First Lieutenant
46
Rep
394
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New jersey

iTrader: (0)

You know what I think your problem is I think youre setting you boost targets wrong or too low. Either I need my glasses or it seems like you have to high targets midrange and immediately lower them to low uptop. Your boost target settings should look a little like what I posted up a few pages back
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 10:23 PM   #1204
snaimpally
Major
170
Rep
1,247
Posts

Drives: 2022 F44 M235i GC
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2022 M235i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShlemonboostedM View Post
U need flex fuel wires regardless .. And u need back end flash or meth or at lease e85 mix to make power on ur pure turbo.. Otherwise it's almost not worth getting .. My turbo should arrive. Thursday .. Can't wait to install it already...
Turbo should arrive tomorrow. Also, received my flex fuel wires for JB4. I have a Cobb for a back end flash. Ordered an AA FMIC so that should I arrive this week. Might have the FMIC and turbo installed at the same time.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 10:38 PM   #1205
snaimpally
Major
170
Rep
1,247
Posts

Drives: 2022 F44 M235i GC
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2022 M235i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkhold View Post
To start get a sportcat/downpipe. Next pick up a fmic and intake. If you still have cash you might get exhaust in the end. Exhaust wont add much if any at all performance.
I have an AA FMIC on the way. Still hesitant to do intake and downpipe due to warranty and noise (I have a good audio system). I'm willing to use lower boost levels until I get around to doing intake and downpipe.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 10:44 PM   #1206
1cleann55
First Lieutenant
46
Rep
394
Posts

Drives: 2011 335i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New jersey

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by snaimpally View Post
I have an AA FMIC on the way. Still hesitant to do intake and downpipe due to warranty and noise (I have a good audio system). I'm willing to use lower boost levels until I get around to doing intake and downpipe.
Without downpipe this turbo is useless no offense. Max boost you'll probably be able to safely run is 13psi across if that. Not saying you can't run 16-19psi with a stock downpipe the issue is that the back pressure will literally blow the turbo up.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 11:17 PM   #1207
snaimpally
Major
170
Rep
1,247
Posts

Drives: 2022 F44 M235i GC
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2022 M235i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1cleann55 View Post
Without downpipe this turbo is useless no offense. Max boost you'll probably be able to safely run is 13psi across if that. Not saying you can't run 16-19psi with a stock downpipe the issue is that the back pressure will literally blow the turbo up.
Thanks - no offense taken. I understand the physics of the situation. My hope was to improve the high end of the rev range with just the turbo. Once I have my Vanos bolts re-done by the dealer, I'll look into a DP.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 11:26 PM   #1208
Newguy123
Captain
122
Rep
652
Posts

Drives: 2008 Nissan Titan
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Carlsbad

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1cleann55 View Post
Without downpipe this turbo is useless no offense. Max boost you'll probably be able to safely run is 13psi across if that. Not saying you can't run 16-19psi with a stock downpipe the issue is that the back pressure will literally blow the turbo up.
No it won't LOL
__________________
2012 DCT 135i
PURE S2
JB4/mhd
Fuel-It! direct port meth injection
check out my youtube channel here
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 11:30 PM   #1209
weehe126
Brigadier General
1189
Rep
3,228
Posts

Drives: 2017 340i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Antonio

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1cleann55 View Post
Without downpipe this turbo is useless no offense. Max boost you'll probably be able to safely run is 13psi across if that. Not saying you can't run 16-19psi with a stock downpipe the issue is that the back pressure will literally blow the turbo up.
Ok I have to say, that is garbage. Please show me any evidence that not having a catless downpipe will blow up your turbo when running higher psi. Yes, having the dp will help lower back pressure and spool quicker. But you will not blow up the turbo if you have a stock downpipe. It is just insane to think that.
Appreciate 0
      08-24-2014, 11:31 PM   #1210
weehe126
Brigadier General
1189
Rep
3,228
Posts

Drives: 2017 340i
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Antonio

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Newguy123 View Post
No it won't LOL
Thank you 😳
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST